गेऑर्ग हेनरिक फ़ॉन व्राइट
बाध्यता और अनुमति के मानदंडों का अपना तर्कशास्त्र है, जो आवश्यकता और संभावना के तर्कशास्त्र के समानांतर है; और मानवीय कर्म कारणात्मक रूप से समझाए जाने के बजाय समझे जाते हैं – व्यावहारिक न्यायवाक्य के द्वारा, जो कर्ताओं के आशय और विश्वास को उनके कर्म से जोड़ता है।
पृष्ठभूमि
फ़िनिश दार्शनिक, कैम्ब्रिज में विट्गेंश्टाइन के उत्तराधिकारी और उनके साहित्यिक उत्तराधिकारियों में से एक: उन्होंने आधुनिक कर्तव्य-तर्कशास्त्र, दायित्व और अनुमति के तर्कशास्त्र की नींव रखी, और तर्क दिया कि कर्मों को कारण-नियमों से समझाया नहीं बल्कि आशयों और व्यावहारिक तर्क के माध्यम से समझा जाता है।
मुख्य विचार
- कर्तव्य-तर्कशास्त्र (deontic logic)
- व्याख्या और समझ
- व्यावहारिक न्याय-अनुमान
- विट्गेंश्टाइन के कागज़ात का संपादन
गुरु: लुडविग विट्गेंश्टाइन, एइनो काइला
शिष्य: याको हिंतिक्का
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 3
लुडविग विट्गेंश्टाइन जिनसे पढ़ा
जिनसे पढ़ा ✓
Von Wright met Wittgenstein in Cambridge in 1939 and attended his lectures; in 1948 he succeeded him in the Cambridge chair and later became one of his literary executors. G. H. von Wright, “Intellectual Autobiography”, in P. A. Schilpp & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (1989)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
लुडविग विट्गेंश्टाइन › 1889–1951
एइनो काइला जिनसे पढ़ा
जिनसे पढ़ा ✓
Von Wright studied with Kaila in Helsinki, who introduced him to logical empiricism, and took his doctorate there in 1941 with The Logical Problem of Induction. G. H. von Wright, “Intellectual Autobiography”, in P. A. Schilpp & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (1989)
साक्ष्य: Wikidata में भी · Wikidata
एइनो काइला › 1890–1958
जी. ई. एम. एन्सकॉम्ब
जिनसे प्रभावित
Von Wright developed Anscombe’s practical syllogism from Intention (1957) into a teleological model of understanding action, set against causal explanation (Explanation and Understanding, 1971). G. H. von Wright, Explanation and Understanding (1971); G. E. M. Anscombe, Intention (1957)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
जी. ई. एम. एन्सकॉम्ब › 1919–2001
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया 2
पॉल रिक्यूर
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
Ricœur took from von Wright’s Explanation and Understanding (1971) the model of intervention, which joins causal and teleological explanation, for historical explanation (Time and Narrative I, 1983). P. Ricœur, Temps et récit I (1983); Du texte à l’action (1986); G. H. von Wright, Explanation and Understanding (1971)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
पॉल रिक्यूर › 1913–2005
याको हिंतिक्का जिन्हें पढ़ाया
जिन्हें पढ़ाया ✓
Hintikka studied with von Wright in Helsinki and took his doctorate under him in 1953 with a dissertation on distributive normal forms in the predicate calculus. J. Hintikka, “Intellectual Autobiography”, in R. E. Auxier & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka (2006)
याको हिंतिक्का › 1929–2015
कृतियाँ
माइंड में लेख जो दायित्व, अनुमति और निषेध को आवश्यकता और संभावना के अनुरूप तार्किक संकारकों के रूप में बरतता है और उन्हें जोड़ने वाले नियम रखता है – एक विषय के रूप में कर्तव्य-तर्कशास्त्र का आरंभ-बिंदु।
- 1971व्याख्या और समझ
कारणात्मक व्याख्या की “गैलीलीय” परंपरा की तुलना प्रयोजनात्मक समझ की “अरस्तूवादी” परंपरा से करता है और तर्क देता है कि कर्मों को व्यावहारिक न्याय-अनुमान – कर्ता के आशय और विश्वासों – से समझा जाता है, जो कोई कारण-नियम नहीं है।
मत
Von Wright is on the map as a founder of modern philosophical logic and a bridge between analytic philosophy and the hermeneutic tradition. In “Deontic Logic” (1951) he showed that the concepts of obligation, permission and prohibition behave like the modal concepts of necessity and possibility and can be treated in a formal system; the paper launched modern deontic logic as a field (an earlier attempt was Ernst Mally’s “Grundgesetze des Sollens”, 1926, from Meinong’s school in Graz), and “Norm and Action” (1963) placed it within a general theory of norms. He also contributed to the logic of preference, of action and of time. In “Explanation and Understanding” (1971) he contrasted a “Galilean” tradition of causal explanation with an “Aristotelian” tradition of teleological understanding and argued, building on Anscombe’s “Intention”, that actions are understood through the practical syllogism: an agent intends an end and believes that a certain action is needed for it, and so sets about doing it – a connection that is logical, not causal. The book was widely discussed by hermeneutic philosophers, among them Paul Ricoeur, and helped to bring the two traditions into conversation. As an editor of Wittgenstein’s papers he shaped how Wittgenstein’s later work became known. His student Jaakko Hintikka continued the Finnish tradition in logic.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Georg Henrik von Wright was born on 14 June 1916 in Helsinki into a Swedish-speaking family. He studied philosophy with Eino Kaila and in 1939 went to Cambridge, where he attended Wittgenstein’s lectures and came to know G. E. Moore and C. D. Broad. His doctoral thesis, “The Logical Problem of Induction”, appeared in 1941. He became professor in Helsinki in 1946 and in 1948 succeeded Wittgenstein as professor of philosophy at Cambridge, returning to Finland in 1951. With Elizabeth Anscombe and Rush Rhees he was one of Wittgenstein’s literary executors and edited many of his posthumous writings. From 1961 he was a member of the Academy of Finland, and from 1965 to 1977 he also held a visiting professorship at Cornell University. In Finland and Sweden he was a prominent public intellectual and a critic of the belief in technological progress. He died in Helsinki on 16 June 2003.
अन्य प्रमुख कृतियाँ
- The Logical Problem of Induction (1941)
- An Essay in Modal Logic (1951)
- Deontic Logic (Mind 60, 1951)
- Norm and Action (1963)
- The Varieties of Goodness (1963)
- Explanation and Understanding (1971)
- Wittgenstein (1982)
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है