格奥尔格·亨里克·冯·赖特
关于义务和允许的规范有其自身的逻辑,与必然性和可能性的逻辑相平行;人的行动是被理解的,而不是被因果地解释的——通过实践三段论,它把行动者的意图和信念与其所作所为联系起来。
定位
芬兰哲学家,维特根斯坦在剑桥的继任者和遗著管理人之一:他创立了现代道义逻辑,即关于义务与允许的逻辑,并主张行动是通过意图和实践推理来理解的,而不是用因果律来解释的。
核心思想
- 道义逻辑
- 解释与理解
- 实践三段论
- 编辑维特根斯坦的遗稿
老师: 路德维希·维特根斯坦, 埃诺·凯拉
学生: 雅科·欣蒂卡
影响
受影响于 3
路德维希·维特根斯坦 师从
师从 ✓
Von Wright met Wittgenstein in Cambridge in 1939 and attended his lectures; in 1948 he succeeded him in the Cambridge chair and later became one of his literary executors. G. H. von Wright, “Intellectual Autobiography”, in P. A. Schilpp & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (1989)
依据: AI 草稿
路德维希·维特根斯坦 › 1889–1951
埃诺·凯拉 师从
师从 ✓
Von Wright studied with Kaila in Helsinki, who introduced him to logical empiricism, and took his doctorate there in 1941 with The Logical Problem of Induction. G. H. von Wright, “Intellectual Autobiography”, in P. A. Schilpp & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (1989)
依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata
埃诺·凯拉 › 1890–1958
G. E. M. 安斯康姆
受其影响
Von Wright developed Anscombe’s practical syllogism from Intention (1957) into a teleological model of understanding action, set against causal explanation (Explanation and Understanding, 1971). G. H. von Wright, Explanation and Understanding (1971); G. E. M. Anscombe, Intention (1957)
依据: AI 草稿
G. E. M. 安斯康姆 › 1919–2001
影响了 2
保罗·利科
影响了
Ricœur took from von Wright’s Explanation and Understanding (1971) the model of intervention, which joins causal and teleological explanation, for historical explanation (Time and Narrative I, 1983). P. Ricœur, Temps et récit I (1983); Du texte à l’action (1986); G. H. von Wright, Explanation and Understanding (1971)
依据: AI 草稿
保罗·利科 › 1913–2005
雅科·欣蒂卡 教过
教过 ✓
Hintikka studied with von Wright in Helsinki and took his doctorate under him in 1953 with a dissertation on distributive normal forms in the predicate calculus. J. Hintikka, “Intellectual Autobiography”, in R. E. Auxier & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka (2006)
雅科·欣蒂卡 › 1929–2015
作品
立场
Von Wright is on the map as a founder of modern philosophical logic and a bridge between analytic philosophy and the hermeneutic tradition. In “Deontic Logic” (1951) he showed that the concepts of obligation, permission and prohibition behave like the modal concepts of necessity and possibility and can be treated in a formal system; the paper launched modern deontic logic as a field (an earlier attempt was Ernst Mally’s “Grundgesetze des Sollens”, 1926, from Meinong’s school in Graz), and “Norm and Action” (1963) placed it within a general theory of norms. He also contributed to the logic of preference, of action and of time. In “Explanation and Understanding” (1971) he contrasted a “Galilean” tradition of causal explanation with an “Aristotelian” tradition of teleological understanding and argued, building on Anscombe’s “Intention”, that actions are understood through the practical syllogism: an agent intends an end and believes that a certain action is needed for it, and so sets about doing it – a connection that is logical, not causal. The book was widely discussed by hermeneutic philosophers, among them Paul Ricoeur, and helped to bring the two traditions into conversation. As an editor of Wittgenstein’s papers he shaped how Wittgenstein’s later work became known. His student Jaakko Hintikka continued the Finnish tradition in logic.
生平与背景
Georg Henrik von Wright was born on 14 June 1916 in Helsinki into a Swedish-speaking family. He studied philosophy with Eino Kaila and in 1939 went to Cambridge, where he attended Wittgenstein’s lectures and came to know G. E. Moore and C. D. Broad. His doctoral thesis, “The Logical Problem of Induction”, appeared in 1941. He became professor in Helsinki in 1946 and in 1948 succeeded Wittgenstein as professor of philosophy at Cambridge, returning to Finland in 1951. With Elizabeth Anscombe and Rush Rhees he was one of Wittgenstein’s literary executors and edited many of his posthumous writings. From 1961 he was a member of the Academy of Finland, and from 1965 to 1977 he also held a visiting professorship at Cornell University. In Finland and Sweden he was a prominent public intellectual and a critic of the belief in technological progress. He died in Helsinki on 16 June 2003.
其他主要作品
- The Logical Problem of Induction (1941)
- An Essay in Modal Logic (1951)
- Deontic Logic (Mind 60, 1951)
- Norm and Action (1963)
- The Varieties of Goodness (1963)
- Explanation and Understanding (1971)
- Wittgenstein (1982)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的