Agora思想的公共广场

爱德华多·维韦罗斯·德卡斯特罗

1951年生

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

维韦罗斯·德卡斯特罗认为,在许多美洲印第安宇宙观中,动物和精灵把自己看作人,而把人看作动物;共同的是文化,即作为人的视角,不同的是身体——这种多元自然主义使人类学成为思想的永久去殖民化。

定位

结构主义与后结构主义 相邻学科:人类学 · 拉丁美洲与加勒比 · 形而上学, 社会与历史, 政治与法

里约热内卢国家博物馆的巴西人类学家:维韦罗斯·德卡斯特罗从亚马孙民族志中发展出“美洲印第安视角主义”:动物和精灵把自己看作人,它们与人的区别在于身体——这种“多元自然主义”颠倒了西方“一个自然、多种文化”的观念。

核心思想

  • 美洲印第安视角主义
  • 以多元自然主义取代多元文化主义
  • 人类学作为思想的永久去殖民化
  • 世界的终结与人类世

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 3

  • 克洛德·列维-斯特劳斯

    受其影响

    Viveiros de Castro reread Lévi-Strauss’s Mythologiques as an Amerindian theory of transformation and continued it in his perspectivism (‘Cosmological Deixis’, 1998; Métaphysiques cannibales, 2009). E. Viveiros de Castro, “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (1998); Métaphysiques cannibales (2009)

    依据: AI 草稿

    克洛德·列维-斯特劳斯 › 1908–2009

  • 吉尔·德勒兹

    受其影响

    Viveiros de Castro used Deleuze and Guattari’s concepts of becoming and multiplicity to describe Amerindian perspectivism (‘Les pronoms cosmologiques’, 1998; Métaphysiques cannibales, 2009). E. Viveiros de Castro, “Les pronoms cosmologiques et le perspectivisme amérindien”, in É. Alliez (ed.), Gilles Deleuze. Une vie philosophique (1998); Métaphysiques cannibales (2009)

    依据: AI 草稿

    吉尔·德勒兹 › 1925–1995

  • 达维·科佩纳瓦

    受其影响

    Viveiros de Castro and Danowski drew on Kopenawa’s falling sky (2010) for an Amerindian view of the end of the world (Há mundo por vir?, 2014). D. Danowski and E. Viveiros de Castro, Há mundo por vir? (2014; The Ends of the World, 2017); D. Kopenawa and B. Albert, La chute du ciel (2010); E. Viveiros de Castro, preface to A queda do céu (2015)

    依据: AI 草稿

    达维·科佩纳瓦 › 约1956年年生

影响了 1

  • 布鲁诺·拉图尔

    影响了

    Latour took up Viveiros de Castro’s perspectivism and multinaturalism, which its author called a ‘bomb’ against the Moderns’ single nature (‘Perspectivism: “Type” or “bomb”?’, 2009). B. Latour, “Perspectivism: ‘Type’ or ‘bomb’?”, Anthropology Today 25/2 (2009); E. Viveiros de Castro, Métaphysiques cannibales (2009); D. Danowski and E. Viveiros de Castro, Há mundo por vir? (2014)

    依据: AI 草稿

    布鲁诺·拉图尔 › 1947–2022

批评

批评了 1

  • 菲利普·德斯科拉

    批评了

    Viveiros de Castro objected that Descola turns perspectivism into one type within a typology of ontologies, defusing its challenge to Western thought (debate, Paris, 2009; Métaphysiques cannibales, 2009). Public debate, Maison Suger, Paris, 30 Jan. 2009, reported in B. Latour, “Perspectivism: ‘Type’ or ‘Bomb’?”, Anthropology Today 25/2 (2009); E. Viveiros de Castro, Métaphysiques cannibales (2009); P. Descola, Par-delà nature et culture (2005)

    依据: AI 草稿

    菲利普·德斯科拉 › 1949年生

作品

  • 发表于《皇家人类学会会刊》的论文:在许多美洲印第安宇宙观中,人、动物和精灵都把自己看作人并共享同一种文化,而它们的身体各不相同;这种“多元自然主义”颠倒了西方“一个自然、多种文化”的组合。

  • 以评论一本虚构之书《反纳喀索斯》的形式写成:它结合德勒兹和加塔利来阅读列维-斯特劳斯的《神话学》,把美洲印第安视角主义和多元自然主义当作独立的概念,并称人类学为思想的永久去殖民化。

立场

Viveiros de Castro is on the map for “Amerindian perspectivism”, set out in Portuguese in 1996 and in English in “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism” (1998). In many Amazonian cosmologies, according to Viveiros de Castro, humans, animals and spirits all see themselves as persons and share one culture, while their bodies – bundles of affects and capacities – give each kind its own world: what humans see as blood, jaguars see as manioc beer. Against the Western scheme of one nature and many cultures Viveiros de Castro called this “multinaturalism”. “Métaphysiques cannibales” (2009) describes anthropology as a decolonisation of thought that never ends, reading Lévi-Strauss’s “Mythologiques” together with Deleuze and Guattari. The work became a reference point of the “ontological turn” in anthropology and of debates on the Anthropocene: “Há mundo por vir?” (2014; “The Ends of the World”), written with the philosopher Déborah Danowski, draws on Davi Kopenawa’s “The Falling Sky” and names Bruno Latour among its interlocutors; Viveiros de Castro also wrote the preface to the Brazilian edition of Kopenawa’s book (2015). In a public debate with Philippe Descola in Paris in 2009, Viveiros de Castro argued that perspectivism is not one type within a typology of ontologies but a challenge to the idea of such a typology. Critics of the ontological turn, among them David Graeber, objected that it reads people’s statements about spirits as descriptions of other worlds and overlooks their own doubts.

生平与背景

Eduardo Viveiros de Castro was born in Rio de Janeiro in 1951. Viveiros de Castro studied social sciences at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro and social anthropology at the National Museum of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, completing there a master’s thesis on the Yawalapiti of the Upper Xingu in 1977 and a doctorate in 1984; the study of the Araweté appeared in 1986 as “Araweté: os deuses canibais”. Viveiros de Castro has taught ethnology at the National Museum since 1978 and became full professor of social anthropology there in 2012. Other posts include the Simón Bolívar Professorship of Latin American Studies at the University of Cambridge (1997–98), a position as directeur de recherche at the CNRS in Paris (1999–2001) and visiting professorships at the University of Chicago, among others. In 2019 Viveiros de Castro was elected to the Brazilian Academy of Sciences.

其他主要作品

  • Araweté: os deuses canibais (1986; From the Enemy’s Point of View, 1992)
  • “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism” (1998; Portuguese 1996)
  • A inconstância da alma selvagem (2002)
  • Métaphysiques cannibales (2009; Cannibal Metaphysics, 2014)
  • Há mundo por vir? (2014, with Déborah Danowski; The Ends of the World, 2017)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开