Agora思想的公共广场

赛阿德丁·塔夫塔扎尼

1322–1390

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

塔夫塔扎尼认为,绝对存在是在心中形成的概念,而不是存在于心外的东西,因此不能像伊本·阿拉比学派那样把它等同于真主;神学必须运用理性和逻辑,但要在启示所设的界限之内。

定位

伊斯兰世界的哲学 · 西亚与北非 · 宗教, 逻辑学, 语言, 形而上学

来自呼罗珊塔夫塔赞的学者,曾在赫拉特、花剌子模、萨拉赫斯以及撒马尔罕的帖木儿宫廷活动:他在语法、修辞、逻辑、法学和神学方面所写的注释成为经学院的标准教材;在他的神学大全——对自己《宗旨》的注释(1383年)中,他捍卫逊尼派立场、反驳哲学家,并拒斥伊本·阿拉比学派所教导的把真主等同于绝对存在的观点。

核心思想

  • 跨越艾什尔里派与马图里迪派的逊尼神学
  • 绝对存在是心中的概念
  • 反对存在单一论
  • 注释的艺术

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 纳吉姆丁·卡提比

    受其影响

    Al-Taftazani wrote a commentary on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya (around 1351), and his own textbook Refinement of Logic carried its innovations into the later curriculum. al-Taftazani, Sharḥ al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya; SEP “al-Khūnajī”

    依据: AI 草稿

    纳吉姆丁·卡提比 › 1203–1277

  • 阿杜德丁·伊吉

    受其影响 ✓

    Al-Taftazani wrote glosses on al-Iji’s commentary on Ibn al-Hajib’s epitome of legal theory; later sources name al-Iji as his most important teacher, which has not been checked here. al-Taftazani, Ḥāshiya ʿalā Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā; Wikidata (P1066)

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    阿杜德丁·伊吉 › 1281–1355

影响了 1

  • 穆罕默德·萨努西

    影响了

    According to the TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, al-Sanusi’s emphasis on rational knowledge shows the influence of later Ashʿaris such as al-Taftazani. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “Senûsî, Muhammed b. Yûsuf” (vol. 36, 2009)

    依据: AI 草稿

    穆罕默德·萨努西 › 约1428–1490年

批评

受批评于 1

  • 谢里夫·朱尔贾尼

    受其批评

    Al-Jurjani disputed with al-Taftazani at Timur’s court in Samarqand, among other things on the “representative metaphor”, and argued against his readings in rhetoric and theology; the individual passages have not been checked here. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “al-Jurjānī”; Wikipedia “Al-Taftazani”

    依据: AI 草稿

    谢里夫·朱尔贾尼 › 1340–1413

批评了 2

  • 伊本·西那(阿维森纳)

    批评了

    Al-Taftazani replied to Ibn Sina’s argument that essences cannot be made by an agent, distinguishing between saying that four would not be even and that four would be non-even. SEP “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Essence and Existence”; al-Taftazani, Sharḥ al-Maqāṣid

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊本·西那(阿维森纳) › 980–1037

  • 伊本·阿拉比

    批评了

    In the Commentary on the Aims al-Taftazani rejected the identification of God with absolute being in the school of Ibn Arabi: absolute being is a concept in the mind, and if it were God, nothing else could be said to be. al-Taftazani, Sharḥ al-Maqāṣid (1383); A. Knysh, Ibn ʿArabi in the Later Islamic Tradition (1999)

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊本·阿拉比 › 1165–1240

作品

  • 对纳吉姆丁·欧麦尔·纳萨菲简短信条的注释,属马图里迪派传统:知识及其来源、世界的被造、真主的属性、人的行为、信仰与伊玛目职位;E. E. 埃尔德将其译为 A Commentary on the Creed of Islam(1950年),它被多次注释,并在整个逊尼派世界讲授。

  • 塔夫塔扎尼于1383年1月完成的对自己神学大全《宗旨》的注释:知识、存在、实体与偶性、真主、先知与伊玛目职位;他在书中回应伊本·西那,并拒斥伊本·阿拉比学派把真主等同于绝对存在的观点。

立场

Al-Taftazani is on the map as one of the scholars whose commentaries defined what students learned in the madrasas from the Ottoman lands to India and Central Asia for centuries. In rhetoric his long and short commentaries on al-Qazwini’s abridgement of al-Sakkaki’s Key were standard; in logic he commented on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya and wrote the textbook Refinement of Logic (Tahdhīb al-manṭiq). His Commentary on the Creed of al-Nasafi, a Maturidi creed, became a standard text of Sunni theology and shows his readiness to move between the Ashʿari and Maturidi schools. His summa is the commentary on his own Aims (al-Maqāṣid), completed in 1383, which treats knowledge, being, substance and accident, God, prophecy and the imamate. In it he replies to Ibn Sina’s argument that essences cannot be made by an agent, distinguishing two kinds of negation, and he attacks the metaphysics of the school of Ibn Arabi: if absolute being were God, nothing else could be said to be; absolute being is rather a concept formed in the mind, a “secondary intelligible” with no reality outside it. Alexander Knysh has shown how strongly this argument shaped the later polemic around Ibn Arabi. Al-Taftazani also gave the Liar paradox its later name, “the paradox of the irrational root”. Al-Sanusi in the Maghrib drew on him, and al-Jurjani argued with his readings in rhetoric and theology.

生平与背景

Saʿd al-Din Masʿud ibn ʿUmar al-Taftazani was born in 1322 in Taftazan, a village in Khorasan. He studied in several cities of eastern Iran and Central Asia, and later sources name ʿAdud al-Din al-Iji as his most important teacher. At sixteen he wrote his first commentary, on an Arabic morphology primer. He taught and wrote in Herat, in Khwarazm and in Sarakhs, where he mainly lived, and from the 1380s was attached to the court of Timur, who brought him to Samarqand. There he met al-Sharif al-Jurjani, whom Timur had taken from Shiraz in 1387; later biographers report disputations between the two in Timur’s presence. He died in Samarqand in 1390 and was buried in Sarakhs. Ibn Khaldun wrote in his Muqaddima that he had found in Egypt many works of al-Taftazani on theology, legal theory and rhetoric that showed a profound command of the rational sciences.

其他主要作品

  • Commentary on the Aims (Sharḥ al-Maqāṣid, 1383)
  • Commentary on the Creed of al-Nasafi (Sharḥ al-ʿAqāʾid al-Nasafiyya)
  • The Long Commentary (al-Muṭawwal) and The Short Commentary (al-Mukhtaṣar) on the Abridgement of the Key, on rhetoric
  • Refinement of Logic and Theology (Tahdhīb al-manṭiq wa-l-kalām)
  • Commentary on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开