Agoraساحة مفتوحة للفكر

سعد الدين التفتازاني

1322–1390

مدخل أولتبسيط مقصود – واللمحة تقول أكثر

رأى التفتازاني أن الوجود المطلق مفهوم يتكوّن في الذهن، لا شيء موجود خارجه، ولذلك لا يصحّ أن يُجعل هو الله كما فعلت مدرسة ابن عربي؛ وعلى علم الكلام أن يستعمل العقل والمنطق، ولكن في الحدود التي يرسمها الوحي.

التموضع

الفلسفة في العالم الإسلامي · غرب آسيا وشمال أفريقيا · الدين, المنطق, اللغة, الميتافيزيقا

عالم من تفتازان في خراسان، عمل في هراة وخوارزم وسرخس وفي بلاط تيمور في سمرقند: كتب في النحو والبلاغة والمنطق والفقه والكلام شروحًا صارت من الكتب المعتمدة في المدارس؛ وفي موسوعته الكلامية «شرح المقاصد» (1383) دافع عن مواقف أهل السنة في وجه الفلاسفة، ورفض ما تعلّمه مدرسة ابن عربي من القول بأن الله هو الوجود المطلق.

الأفكار الرئيسة

  • كلام سنّي يجمع بين الأشاعرة والماتريدية
  • الوجود المطلق مفهوم في الذهن
  • ضد وحدة الوجود
  • فن الشرح

افتح في خريطة النجوم

التأثير

تأثّر بـ 2

  • نجم الدين الكاتبي القزويني

    تأثّر بـ

    Al-Taftazani wrote a commentary on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya (around 1351), and his own textbook Refinement of Logic carried its innovations into the later curriculum. al-Taftazani, Sharḥ al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya; SEP “al-Khūnajī”

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    نجم الدين الكاتبي القزويني › 1203–1277

  • عضد الدين الإيجي

    تأثّر بـ ✓

    Al-Taftazani wrote glosses on al-Iji’s commentary on Ibn al-Hajib’s epitome of legal theory; later sources name al-Iji as his most important teacher, which has not been checked here. al-Taftazani, Ḥāshiya ʿalā Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā; Wikidata (P1066)

    التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في Wikidata · Wikidata

    عضد الدين الإيجي › 1281–1355

أثّر في 1

  • محمد بن يوسف السنوسي

    أثّر في

    According to the TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, al-Sanusi’s emphasis on rational knowledge shows the influence of later Ashʿaris such as al-Taftazani. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “Senûsî, Muhammed b. Yûsuf” (vol. 36, 2009)

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    محمد بن يوسف السنوسي › نحو 1428–1490

النقد

انتقده 1

  • الشريف الجرجاني

    انتقده

    Al-Jurjani disputed with al-Taftazani at Timur’s court in Samarqand, among other things on the “representative metaphor”, and argued against his readings in rhetoric and theology; the individual passages have not been checked here. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “al-Jurjānī”; Wikipedia “Al-Taftazani”

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    الشريف الجرجاني › 1340–1413

ينتقد 2

  • ابن سينا

    انتقد

    Al-Taftazani replied to Ibn Sina’s argument that essences cannot be made by an agent, distinguishing between saying that four would not be even and that four would be non-even. SEP “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Essence and Existence”; al-Taftazani, Sharḥ al-Maqāṣid

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    ابن سينا › 980–1037

  • محيي الدين بن عربي

    انتقد

    In the Commentary on the Aims al-Taftazani rejected the identification of God with absolute being in the school of Ibn Arabi: absolute being is a concept in the mind, and if it were God, nothing else could be said to be. al-Taftazani, Sharḥ al-Maqāṣid (1383); A. Knysh, Ibn ʿArabi in the Later Islamic Tradition (1999)

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    محيي الدين بن عربي › 1165–1240

الأعمال

  • شرح على العقيدة القصيرة لنجم الدين عمر النسفي في التقليد الماتريدي: العلم ومصادره، وحدوث العالم، وصفات الله، وأفعال العباد، والإيمان والإمامة؛ ترجمه إ. إ. إلدر بعنوان A Commentary on the Creed of Islam (1950)، وكثرت حواشيه ودُرّس في العالم السني كله.

  • شرح أتمّه التفتازاني في يناير 1383 على موسوعته الكلامية «المقاصد»: العلم والوجود والجوهر والعرض والإلهيات والنبوة والإمامة؛ وفيه يرد على ابن سينا ويرفض القول في مدرسة ابن عربي بأن الله هو الوجود المطلق.

الموقف

Al-Taftazani is on the map as one of the scholars whose commentaries defined what students learned in the madrasas from the Ottoman lands to India and Central Asia for centuries. In rhetoric his long and short commentaries on al-Qazwini’s abridgement of al-Sakkaki’s Key were standard; in logic he commented on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya and wrote the textbook Refinement of Logic (Tahdhīb al-manṭiq). His Commentary on the Creed of al-Nasafi, a Maturidi creed, became a standard text of Sunni theology and shows his readiness to move between the Ashʿari and Maturidi schools. His summa is the commentary on his own Aims (al-Maqāṣid), completed in 1383, which treats knowledge, being, substance and accident, God, prophecy and the imamate. In it he replies to Ibn Sina’s argument that essences cannot be made by an agent, distinguishing two kinds of negation, and he attacks the metaphysics of the school of Ibn Arabi: if absolute being were God, nothing else could be said to be; absolute being is rather a concept formed in the mind, a “secondary intelligible” with no reality outside it. Alexander Knysh has shown how strongly this argument shaped the later polemic around Ibn Arabi. Al-Taftazani also gave the Liar paradox its later name, “the paradox of the irrational root”. Al-Sanusi in the Maghrib drew on him, and al-Jurjani argued with his readings in rhetoric and theology.

الحياة والسياق

Saʿd al-Din Masʿud ibn ʿUmar al-Taftazani was born in 1322 in Taftazan, a village in Khorasan. He studied in several cities of eastern Iran and Central Asia, and later sources name ʿAdud al-Din al-Iji as his most important teacher. At sixteen he wrote his first commentary, on an Arabic morphology primer. He taught and wrote in Herat, in Khwarazm and in Sarakhs, where he mainly lived, and from the 1380s was attached to the court of Timur, who brought him to Samarqand. There he met al-Sharif al-Jurjani, whom Timur had taken from Shiraz in 1387; later biographers report disputations between the two in Timur’s presence. He died in Samarqand in 1390 and was buried in Sarakhs. Ibn Khaldun wrote in his Muqaddima that he had found in Egypt many works of al-Taftazani on theology, legal theory and rhetoric that showed a profound command of the rational sciences.

أعمال رئيسة أخرى

  • Commentary on the Aims (Sharḥ al-Maqāṣid, 1383)
  • Commentary on the Creed of al-Nasafi (Sharḥ al-ʿAqāʾid al-Nasafiyya)
  • The Long Commentary (al-Muṭawwal) and The Short Commentary (al-Mukhtaṣar) on the Abridgement of the Key, on rhetoric
  • Refinement of Logic and Theology (Tahdhīb al-manṭiq wa-l-kalām)
  • Commentary on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya

المصادر: Wikipedia · Wikidata

بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora

افتح في خريطة النجوم