Agora思想的公共广场

纳吉姆丁·卡提比

1203–1277

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

卡提比认为,逻辑是一种规则,遵守它能使心灵免于思维中的错误;他以伊本·西那及其批评者为基础,为远多于伊本·西那所考察的模态命题阐述了换位、矛盾和三段论,其形式简明到足以用于教学。

定位

伊斯兰世界的哲学 · 西亚与北非 · 逻辑学, 形而上学, 科学

来自加兹温的逻辑学家和哲学家,阿卜哈里的学生,曾与纳西尔丁·图西在马拉盖天文台共事:他的《致沙姆斯丁论》(沙姆斯论集),一部为名叫沙姆斯丁的赞助人所写的简明逻辑学,从十三世纪到二十世纪一直在经学院中讲授;他的《源泉之哲学》在伊本·西那的框架内阐述自然学和形而上学。

核心思想

  • 逻辑是使心灵免于思维错误的规则
  • 十三种模态命题
  • 按心中存在来解读命题
  • 依循伊本·西那的自然学与形而上学

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 3

  • 伊本·西那(阿维森纳)

    受其影响

    Al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya builds on Ibn Sina’s temporal modal logic, though it examines thirteen modal propositions where Ibn Sina had examined six, and his Philosophy of the Source presents metaphysics largely in Ibn Sina’s terms. T. Street, The Rules of Logic (2024); SEP “Arabic and Islamic Metaphysics”

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊本·西那(阿维森纳) › 980–1037

  • 苏赫拉瓦迪

    受其影响

    Like al-Abhari, al-Katibi responded to Suhrawardi’s criticism of the distinction between essence and existence. SEP “Suhrawardi” (C. Marcotte), citing H. Eichner (2012)

    依据: AI 草稿

    苏赫拉瓦迪 › 1154–1191

  • 阿西尔丁·阿卜哈里

    受其影响

    Al-Katibi, reported to have been al-Abhari’s student, adopted his framework for reading propositions, in which the subject may exist outside the mind, be merely possible or exist only in the mind. SEP “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Language and Logic” (T. Street); SEP “al-Khūnajī” (al-Katibi, Jāmiʿ al-daqāʾiq, 152)

    依据: AI 草稿

    阿西尔丁·阿卜哈里 › 约1194–1265年

影响了 2

  • 赛阿德丁·塔夫塔扎尼

    影响了

    Al-Taftazani wrote a commentary on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya (around 1351), and his own textbook Refinement of Logic carried its innovations into the later curriculum. al-Taftazani, Sharḥ al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya; SEP “al-Khūnajī”

    依据: AI 草稿

    赛阿德丁·塔夫塔扎尼 › 1322–1390

  • 谢里夫·朱尔贾尼

    影响了

    Al-Jurjani wrote extensive glosses on Qutb al-Din al-Tahtani’s commentary on al-Katibi’s Shamsiyya, which were read with the text in the madrasas. al-Jurjani, Ḥāshiya ʿalā Taḥrīr al-qawāʿid al-manṭiqiyya (manuscripts Bodleian Library, Princeton 1412); K. El-Rouayheb, The Development of Arabic Logic (2019)

    依据: AI 草稿

    谢里夫·朱尔贾尼 › 1340–1413

批评

批评了 1

  • 法赫尔丁·拉齐

    批评了

    Al-Katibi put a series of critical questions to Fakhr al-Din al-Razi’s theological compendium al-Maʿālim, to which Ibn Kammuna later added notes; the content has not been checked here. Asʾilat Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī ʿan al-Maʿālim li-Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, ed. S. Schmidtke and R. Pourjavady (2007); SEP “al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din”, bibliography

    依据: AI 草稿

    法赫尔丁·拉齐 › 约1150–1210年

作品

  • 为一位名叫沙姆斯丁的赞助人所写的简明逻辑教科书:词项与定义、命题及其模态、换位与矛盾、三段论;连同库特布丁·塔赫塔尼的注释和朱尔贾尼的批注,它数百年间一直是经学院的标准逻辑教材。

  • 约1270年源泉之哲学

    在伊本·西那框架内论述形而上学和自然哲学的著作——存在及其划分、必然存在者、物体、灵魂和理智;连同其注释,在经学院中广为研读。

立场

Al-Katibi is on the map for the Treatise for Shams al-Din (al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya), a compact textbook of logic that madrasa students have read from the fourteenth century to the present. It defines logic as a rule whose observance guards the mind from error in thinking and moves from terms, definitions and propositions to conversion, contradiction and the syllogism. Its system rests on Ibn Sina’s temporal modal logic but goes further: where Ibn Sina had examined six modalities, al-Katibi treats thirteen modal propositions as customary to investigate. In reading propositions he took over al-Abhari’s framework, in which the subject may exist outside the mind, be merely possible or exist only in the mind. With the commentary of Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani and the glosses of al-Sharif al-Jurjani the Shamsiyya became a standard text from Anatolia to India; al-Taftazani wrote a commentary of his own on it. His Philosophy of the Source (Ḥikmat al-ʿayn) presented metaphysics and natural philosophy largely in Ibn Sina’s terms and was, with al-Abhari’s Guide to Philosophy, one of the channels through which Avicennan metaphysics reached the schools; like al-Abhari, he also responded to Suhrawardi’s criticism of the distinction between essence and existence. He put critical questions to Fakhr al-Din al-Razi’s compendium of theology, al-Maʿālim, to which Ibn Kammuna added notes, and he analysed the Liar paradox, as al-Abhari did, as a self-contradiction. A complete edition and English translation of the Shamsiyya by Tony Street appeared in 2024.

生平与背景

Najm al-Din ʿAli ibn ʿUmar al-Katibi al-Qazwini was born in Qazvin around 1203 and belonged to the Shafiʿi school of law. He studied with Athir al-Din al-Abhari; there is some evidence that the two later fell out. In the Mongol period he became one of the most respected logicians and philosophers of Iran and worked at the observatory of Maragha, founded by Nasir al-Din al-Tusi in 1259, in the circle of scholars around al-Tusi. He exchanged letters on logic and metaphysics with the Jewish philosopher Ibn Kammuna in Baghdad. Among his students was Qutb al-Din al-Shirazi. He died in 1276 or 1277; Wikidata gives 1277.

其他主要作品

  • The Treatise for Shams al-Din on the Rules of Logic (al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya)
  • The Philosophy of the Source (Ḥikmat al-ʿayn)
  • Jāmiʿ al-daqāʾiq fī kashf al-ḥaqāʾiq, on logic
  • Questions on Fakhr al-Din al-Razi’s al-Maʿālim (with notes by Ibn Kammuna)
  • Commentary on al-Khunaji’s Kashf al-asrār

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开