स्तानिस्लाव लेशनेव्स्की
वर्ग को अमूर्त समुच्चय के बजाय अपने अंशों से बने समग्र के रूप में समझा जा सकता है; एक बार “वर्ग” के इन दो अर्थों को अलग रखा जाए, रसेल का विरोधाभास नहीं उठता, और तर्कशास्त्र को अमूर्त वस्तुओं की आवश्यकता नहीं।
पृष्ठभूमि
पोलिश तर्कशास्त्री जिन्होंने रसेल के विरोधाभास का उत्तर अपनी तीन औपचारिक प्रणालियों से दिया – प्रोटोथेटिक, ऑन्टोलॉजी और मीरियोलॉजी (अंश और समग्र का सिद्धांत) – और चिह्नों के प्रयोग तथा उल्लेख के बीच ठीक भेद पर बल दिया।
मुख्य विचार
- मीरियोलॉजी (अंश और समग्र)
- ऑन्टोलॉजी और प्रोटोथेटिक
- नामवाद
- प्रयोग और उल्लेख
गुरु: काज़िमिएज़ ट्वार्दोव्स्की
शिष्य: आल्फ्रेड टार्स्की
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 2
काज़िमिएज़ ट्वार्दोव्स्की जिनसे पढ़ा
जिनसे पढ़ा ✓
Leśniewski came to Lwów after studies in Germany, Switzerland and Russia, studied with Twardowski and took his doctorate under him in 1912 with a dissertation on the analysis of existential propositions. SEP “Stanisław Leśniewski”
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
काज़िमिएज़ ट्वार्दोव्स्की › 1866–1938
बर्टराण्ड रसेल
जिनसे प्रभावित
Leśniewski traced Russell’s paradox to a confusion of distributive and collective classes and built mereology, a theory of collective classes, in response (Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości, 1916). S. Leśniewski, Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości I (1916); SEP “Stanisław Leśniewski”; SEP “Mereology”
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
बर्टराण्ड रसेल › 1872–1970
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया 1
आल्फ्रेड टार्स्की जिन्हें पढ़ाया
जिन्हें पढ़ाया
Tarski took his doctorate in Warsaw in 1924 under Leśniewski’s supervision, with a thesis on the primitive term of logistic. SEP “Alfred Tarski”; A. B. Feferman & S. Feferman, Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic (2004)
साक्ष्य: InPhO में भी · InPhO
आल्फ्रेड टार्स्की › 1901–1983
कृतियाँ
मीरियोलॉजी की पहली प्रस्तुति: वर्ग अंशों से बने समग्र के रूप में समझे गए, रसेल के विरोधाभास से निकलने का एक मार्ग।
मत
Leśniewski wanted a logic free of the paradoxes and of what he regarded as the unclarities of “Principia Mathematica”. He built three systems on one another: protothetic, a propositional calculus with quantifiers over propositions and connectives; ontology, a calculus of names built on a single copula “is” (ε) that admits empty and general names; and mereology, a theory of collective classes in which a class is a whole made of its parts, not an abstract set. Russell’s paradox arises, he argued, because the distributive and the collective sense of “class” are confused. His nominalism admitted only concrete individuals, and he required that every formula be built by explicit rules, definitions included, and that using an expression be strictly distinguished from mentioning it. These standards shaped Tarski, whose analysis of the semantic paradoxes and of the concept of truth drew on them, and Kotarbiński’s reism. Mereology was developed further by Henry Leonard and Nelson Goodman (1940) and by Peter Simons (1987) and belongs today to the standard tools of formal ontology. His idiosyncratic notation, the few publications and the loss of his papers limited his reception.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Stanisław Leśniewski was born on 30 March 1886 in Serpukhov near Moscow, where his father, a Polish engineer, was working on the construction of a railway; he went to school in Irkutsk in Siberia. From 1904 he studied mathematics and philosophy at several universities in Germany and Switzerland, among them Leipzig, Zurich, Heidelberg and Munich, before moving to Lwów, where he took his doctorate under Kazimierz Twardowski in 1912 with a thesis on existential sentences. Łukasiewicz’s book on the principle of contradiction in Aristotle (1910) acquainted him with Russell’s paradox, which turned him from the philosophical analysis of language to the foundations of logic and mathematics. During the First World War he taught at Polish schools in Moscow, where his first account of mereology appeared in 1916. In 1919 he became professor of the philosophy of mathematics at the University of Warsaw, where he taught until his death; Alfred Tarski took his doctorate under him in 1924. From the 1920s Leśniewski supported the authoritarian rule of Józef Piłsudski, and from about 1930 his views took on an antisemitic tinge; a letter to Twardowski of 1935 voices it, together with a personal antipathy towards Tarski, whose candidacy for a chair in Lwów he had earlier supported (P. Simons, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). His systems were published only in part, above all in the series “On the Foundations of Mathematics” (1927–31). He died of cancer in Warsaw on 13 May 1939; most of his manuscripts were destroyed during the Warsaw Uprising of 1944.
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है