AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Stanisław Leśniewski

1886–1939

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Klasę można rozumieć jako całość złożoną z jej części, a nie jako abstrakcyjny zbiór; gdy oba sensy „klasy” się rozróżni, paradoks Russella nie powstaje, a logika nie potrzebuje przedmiotów abstrakcyjnych.

Umiejscowienie

Filozofia analityczna · Europa Wschodnia · Logika, Metafizyka

Polski logik, który odpowiedział na paradoks Russella trzema własnymi systemami formalnymi – protetyką, ontologią i mereologią, teorią części i całości – i nalegał na ścisłe rozróżnienie użycia i wzmianki o znakach.

Kluczowe idee

  • Mereologia (części i całości)
  • Ontologia i protetyka
  • Nominalizm
  • Użycie i wzmianka

Nauczyciele: Kazimierz Twardowski

Uczniowie: Alfred Tarski

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 2

  • Kazimierz Twardowski nauczyciel(ka)

    nauczyciel(ka) ✓

    Leśniewski came to Lwów after studies in Germany, Switzerland and Russia, studied with Twardowski and took his doctorate under him in 1912 with a dissertation on the analysis of existential propositions. SEP “Stanisław Leśniewski”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Kazimierz Twardowski › 1866–1938

  • Bertrand Russell

    pod wpływem

    Leśniewski traced Russell’s paradox to a confusion of distributive and collective classes and built mereology, a theory of collective classes, in response (Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości, 1916). S. Leśniewski, Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości I (1916); SEP “Stanisław Leśniewski”; SEP “Mereology”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Bertrand Russell › 1872–1970

Wpływ na 1

  • Alfred Tarski uczeń/uczennica

    uczeń/uczennica

    Tarski took his doctorate in Warsaw in 1924 under Leśniewski’s supervision, with a thesis on the primitive term of logistic. SEP “Alfred Tarski”; A. B. Feferman & S. Feferman, Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic (2004)

    Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO

    Alfred Tarski › 1901–1983

Dzieła

Stanowisko

Leśniewski wanted a logic free of the paradoxes and of what he regarded as the unclarities of “Principia Mathematica”. He built three systems on one another: protothetic, a propositional calculus with quantifiers over propositions and connectives; ontology, a calculus of names built on a single copula “is” (ε) that admits empty and general names; and mereology, a theory of collective classes in which a class is a whole made of its parts, not an abstract set. Russell’s paradox arises, he argued, because the distributive and the collective sense of “class” are confused. His nominalism admitted only concrete individuals, and he required that every formula be built by explicit rules, definitions included, and that using an expression be strictly distinguished from mentioning it. These standards shaped Tarski, whose analysis of the semantic paradoxes and of the concept of truth drew on them, and Kotarbiński’s reism. Mereology was developed further by Henry Leonard and Nelson Goodman (1940) and by Peter Simons (1987) and belongs today to the standard tools of formal ontology. His idiosyncratic notation, the few publications and the loss of his papers limited his reception.

Życie i kontekst

Stanisław Leśniewski was born on 30 March 1886 in Serpukhov near Moscow, where his father, a Polish engineer, was working on the construction of a railway; he went to school in Irkutsk in Siberia. From 1904 he studied mathematics and philosophy at several universities in Germany and Switzerland, among them Leipzig, Zurich, Heidelberg and Munich, before moving to Lwów, where he took his doctorate under Kazimierz Twardowski in 1912 with a thesis on existential sentences. Łukasiewicz’s book on the principle of contradiction in Aristotle (1910) acquainted him with Russell’s paradox, which turned him from the philosophical analysis of language to the foundations of logic and mathematics. During the First World War he taught at Polish schools in Moscow, where his first account of mereology appeared in 1916. In 1919 he became professor of the philosophy of mathematics at the University of Warsaw, where he taught until his death; Alfred Tarski took his doctorate under him in 1924. From the 1920s Leśniewski supported the authoritarian rule of Józef Piłsudski, and from about 1930 his views took on an antisemitic tinge; a letter to Twardowski of 1935 voices it, together with a personal antipathy towards Tarski, whose candidacy for a chair in Lwów he had earlier supported (P. Simons, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). His systems were published only in part, above all in the series “On the Foundations of Mathematics” (1927–31). He died of cancer in Warsaw on 13 May 1939; most of his manuscripts were destroyed during the Warsaw Uprising of 1944.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • Contribution to the Analysis of Existential Propositions (Przyczynek do analizy zdań egzystencjalnych, 1911)
  • On the Foundations of Mathematics (O podstawach matematyki, 1927–31)
  • Outline of a New System of the Foundations of Mathematics (Grundzüge eines neuen Systems der Grundlagen der Mathematik, 1929)
  • On the Foundations of Ontology (Über die Grundlagen der Ontologie, 1930)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd