Agora思想的公共广场

阿西尔丁·阿卜哈里

约1194–1265年

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

阿卜哈里认为,逻辑是每一门学问都需要的工具,可以用寥寥数页教给初学者;在高等逻辑中,他修正伊本·西那,把某些命题理解为关于只存在于心中之物的命题,使推理也能涵盖仅仅可能的事物。

定位

伊斯兰世界的哲学 · 西亚与北非 · 逻辑学, 形而上学, 科学

来自伊朗西北部阿卜哈尔的逻辑学家、天文学家和数学家,曾在大马士革和摩苏尔求学,并在摩苏尔授课:他简短的逻辑学《导论》(伊萨格吉)和《哲学指南》——依据伊本·西那的逻辑学、自然学和形而上学——成为从安纳托利亚到印度的经学院教科书;在高等逻辑中,他在若干问题上修正了伊本·西那,纳西尔丁·图西对此作出回应。

核心思想

  • 逻辑是通往各门学问之门
  • 关于只存在于心中之物的命题
  • 修正伊本·西那的逻辑
  • 一本手册中的整套哲学课程

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 伊本·西那(阿维森纳)

    受其影响

    Al-Abhari’s Guide to Philosophy presents logic, physics and metaphysics largely in Ibn Sina’s terms; its metaphysics, like that of al-Katibi’s Philosophy of the Source, depends closely on Ibn Sina and carried his doctrines into the madrasas. SEP “Arabic and Islamic Metaphysics” (A. Bertolacci); al-Abhari, Hidāyat al-ḥikma

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊本·西那(阿维森纳) › 980–1037

  • 苏赫拉瓦迪

    受其影响

    Al-Abhari took up Suhrawardi’s criticism of the real distinction between essence and existence and incorporated Illuminationist ideas in several of his works. SEP “Suhrawardi” (C. Marcotte), citing H. Eichner (2012); SEP “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Essence and Existence”

    依据: AI 草稿

    苏赫拉瓦迪 › 1154–1191

影响了 2

  • 纳吉姆丁·卡提比

    影响了

    Al-Katibi, reported to have been al-Abhari’s student, adopted his framework for reading propositions, in which the subject may exist outside the mind, be merely possible or exist only in the mind. SEP “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Language and Logic” (T. Street); SEP “al-Khūnajī” (al-Katibi, Jāmiʿ al-daqāʾiq, 152)

    依据: AI 草稿

    纳吉姆丁·卡提比 › 1203–1277

  • 毛拉·萨德拉

    影响了

    Mulla Sadra wrote a commentary on al-Abhari’s Guide to Philosophy (Sharḥ al-Hidāya al-athīriyya), which became the cornerstone of the rationalist curriculum of the Indian madrasa from the eighteenth century. SEP “Mulla Sadra” (S. Rizvi)

    依据: AI 草稿

    毛拉·萨德拉 › 约1572–1640年

批评

受批评于 1

  • 纳西尔丁·图西

    受其批评

    Nasir al-Din al-Tusi answered al-Abhari’s logic book Tanzīl al-afkār in a systematic critique, Adjusting the Standard (Taʿdīl al-miʿyār), defending Ibn Sina’s logic against al-Abhari’s revisions. al-Tusi, Taʿdīl al-miʿyār fī naqd Tanzīl al-afkār, ed. M. Mohaghegh and T. Izutsu, Collected Texts and Papers on Logic and Language (1974); SEP “al-Khūnajī”

    依据: AI 草稿

    纳西尔丁·图西 › 1201–1274

作品

  • 约1250年哲学指南

    分逻辑学、自然学和形而上学三部分的整套哲学手册,大体依循伊本·西那;通过对它的注释,尤其是毛拉·萨德拉的注释,伊本·西那的哲学进入了伊朗、奥斯曼帝国和印度的经学院。

  • 简短的逻辑学入门,以波菲利的《导论》命名:在寥寥数页中讲述五种普遍概念、定义、命题、三段论和各类论证;数百年间它是经学院学生的第一部逻辑课本,被多次注释,1625年出版了拉丁文译本。

立场

Al-Abhari is on the map as one of the logicians through whom Ibn Sina’s philosophy became the curriculum of the madrasas. His short Isagoge – named after Porphyry’s introduction, but covering the whole of logic in a few pages – was for centuries the first logic text that students read, from the Ottoman lands to India, and his Guide to Philosophy (Hidāyat al-ḥikma) presented logic, physics and metaphysics in one handbook whose metaphysics follows Ibn Sina closely. In his longer works on logic he belonged to the thirteenth-century logicians who revised Ibn Sina. Examining Afdal al-Din al-Khunaji’s reading of propositions according to the essence of their subject, he showed that it would make all universal propositions false and all particular ones true; he therefore restricted that reading to what is possible and added the “mental proposition”, whose subject exists in the mind. Unlike Ibn Sina, he admitted that impossible things can exist in the mind. Al-Katibi and many later logicians adopted this framework. Nasir al-Din al-Tusi answered al-Abhari’s logic in a systematic critique, Adjusting the Standard (Taʿdīl al-miʿyār), one of the main confrontations between defenders of Ibn Sina’s logic and its revisers. Al-Abhari also took up Suhrawardi’s criticism of the distinction between essence and existence. Through the commentaries on his Guide to Philosophy his influence lasted into modern times: Mulla Sadra’s commentary became, in Sajjad Rizvi’s words, the cornerstone of the rationalist curriculum of the Indian madrasa from the eighteenth century.

生平与背景

Athir al-Din al-Mufaddal ibn ʿUmar al-Abhari was born in Abhar, a small town between Qazvin and Zanjan in north-western Iran; his year of birth is unknown, and Wikidata gives 1194. Later reports make him a student of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, but modern scholars doubt that the two ever met. When the Mongols overran the Khwarazmian empire he moved west: by 1228 he was in Erbil, and he studied in Damascus and in Mosul, where he learned mathematics and astronomy from Kamal al-Din ibn Yunus. He taught logic, philosophy and astronomy; among his students were the logician Najm al-Din al-Katibi, the cosmographer Zakariya al-Qazwini and the biographer Ibn Khallikan. Besides his works on logic and philosophy he wrote on astronomy and on Euclid, including an attempt to prove the parallel postulate. He died between 1262 and 1265, according to most accounts in Mosul.

其他主要作品

  • Introduction to Logic (Īsāghūjī)
  • Guide to Philosophy (Hidāyat al-ḥikma)
  • Tanzīl al-afkār fī taʿdīl al-asrār, on logic (criticised by Nasir al-Din al-Tusi)
  • Kashf al-ḥaqāʾiq fī taḥrīr al-daqāʾiq, on logic, physics and metaphysics
  • Treatises on astronomy and on Euclid

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开