Agora思想的公共广场

卡涅阿德斯

约公元前214—前129年年

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

我们永远无法确定一个印象是真的,但我们可以检验它有多么可信——而这足以让我们据以生活和行动。

定位

希腊化时期、罗马与古代晚期哲学 · 西亚与北非 · 认识论, 伦理学, 宗教

来自昔兰尼的学园领袖,没有留下著作:没有任何印象能保证自身为真,但仅仅“有说服力的”东西可以指导行动;他对一个问题的每一方都加以论辩,据说公元前155年在罗马,他一天为正义发言,第二天又反对正义。

核心思想

  • 有说服力的东西(pithanon)作为指南
  • 正反两面论辩
  • 对斯多葛神学、占卜与命运的批判
  • 伦理目的的划分(卡涅阿德斯划分,Carneadea divisio)

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 1

  • 阿尔凯西劳斯

    受其影响

    Carneades took up Arcesilaus’ arguments against the Stoic criterion of truth and sharpened them against Chrysippus’ refined version; he too argued on both sides of a question. Cicero, Academica II; Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians I.159–189; SEP “Carneades”

    依据: 亦见于 InPhO · InPhO

    阿尔凯西劳斯 › 约公元前316—前241年年

影响了 1

  • 西塞罗

    影响了

    Cicero drew on Carneades, via Clitomachus, in Academica and On the Nature of the Gods, and used his division of views on the highest good (De finibus V). Cicero, Academica II; De natura deorum III; De finibus V.16–23; SEP “Carneades”

    依据: AI 草稿

    西塞罗 › 公元前106—前43年

批评

受批评于 2

  • 塞克斯都·恩披里柯

    受其批评

    Sextus set Pyrrhonism apart from Carneades’ New Academy, whose claim that nothing can be known and trust in the ‘persuasive’ he judged dogmatic. Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism I.220–235

    依据: AI 草稿

    塞克斯都·恩披里柯 › 约160–210年

  • 奥古斯丁

    受其批评

    Augustine answered the probabilism of Carneades: whoever has never grasped the truth cannot know what merely resembles it (Contra Academicos, 386). Augustine, Contra Academicos II.7.16–12.27; Cicero, Academica II.98–104

    依据: AI 草稿

    奥古斯丁 › 354–430

批评了 2

  • 伊壁鸠鲁

    批评了

    Carneades objected that Epicurus needed no atomic swerve to save free will, since a voluntary movement of the mind needs no external cause. Cicero, De fato 23, 31–32

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊壁鸠鲁 › 公元前341—前270年

  • 克律西波斯

    批评了

    Carneades attacked Chrysippus’ ‘kataleptic’ impression, arguing that any true impression could have an indistinguishable false twin; he said that he himself would be nothing without Chrysippus. Cicero, Academica II.40–42, 83–90; Diogenes Laertius 4.62; SEP “Carneades”

    依据: AI 草稿

    克律西波斯 › 约公元前279—前206年年

立场

Carneades sharpened Arcesilaus’ arguments against the Stoic theory of knowledge, which Chrysippus had meanwhile defended and refined; he is credited with the remark that without Chrysippus he himself would not have existed. No impression carries a mark of truth that a false impression could not also carry. Carneades nevertheless described how one can act and inquire without certainty. According to Sextus Empiricus, impressions can be more or less persuasive (pithanon): persuasive in themselves; persuasive and not contradicted by any other impression; and persuasive, uncontradicted and thoroughly tested. The more important the matter, the more testing it requires. Whether Carneades endorsed this view or only put it forward for the sake of argument was already disputed among his pupils; Clitomachus said he had never discovered what Carneades really thought. In ethics he drew up a scheme of all possible views of the highest good, the Carneadea divisio, which Cicero used to sort the schools (De finibus V 16–23). Against the Stoics he argued that their gods could not exist as described, that divination has no basis, and that the principle that every statement is true or false does not imply that everything is fated; against the Epicureans, that freedom does not need a swerve of the atoms. Much of Cicero’s Academica, On the Nature of the Gods and On Divination draws on Carneades through Clitomachus. Sextus Empiricus set Pyrrhonism apart from the New Academy, and Augustine’s Against the Academics (386) was written against Carneades and Arcesilaus.

生平与背景

Carneades was born around 214/213 BCE in Cyrene in North Africa. In Athens he studied in the Academy and, according to Diogenes Laertius, learned dialectic from the Stoic Diogenes of Babylon. By the middle of the second century BCE he was head of the Academy. In 155 BCE Athens sent him to Rome, together with Diogenes of Babylon and the Peripatetic Critolaus, to plead for the reduction of a fine imposed over the town of Oropus. His lectures drew crowds of young Romans, and Cato the Elder is said to have urged the Senate to send the philosophers home quickly. A story that goes back to Cicero’s Republic, preserved by Lactantius, has him praising justice one day and arguing against it the next; how far it is reliable is disputed. Carneades wrote nothing. His pupil Clitomachus, a Carthaginian, recorded his arguments in many books, all lost. He gave up the headship in old age and died around 129/128 BCE, at 85.

主要作品

  • No writings (Carneades taught only orally; the books of his pupil Clitomachus are lost)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开