Agora思想的公共广场

布赖恩·伯克哈特

同时代

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

意义、存在和知识都生长于我们与土地的关系;一种把它们从任何地方割裂开来的哲学,从一开始就把原住民排除在外——而亲缘的伦理学不需要对价值进行排序。

定位

原住民哲学 · 形而上学, 认识论, 伦理学

切罗基族哲学家,在纳瓦霍族地区长大,任教于俄克拉何马大学:存在、意义和知识植根于土地(“地方性”);西方哲学把它们当作脱离土地而漂浮的,而这种“去地方性”服务于殖民化。

核心思想

  • 地方性与去地方性
  • 骗子方法论
  • 没有价值的伦理学:以亲缘取代内在价值
  • 原住民环境伦理学

老师: 小维因·德洛里亚

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 小维因·德洛里亚 师从

    师从

    A university profile calls Deloria Burkhart’s mentor; Burkhart’s own academic profile lists Deloria among the advisers of his doctorate at Indiana University, beside Paul Vincent Spade and James G. Hart. A mentorship, not documented as classroom teaching. California State University, Northridge, College of Humanities newsletter, “University Research Fellow Dr. Brian Burkhart” (2014); B. Burkhart, profile on academia.edu

    依据: AI 草稿

    小维因·德洛里亚 › 1933–2005

  • 恩里克·杜塞尔

    受其影响

    Drawing on Enrique Dussel, Burkhart traces the Cartesian ego cogito back to the ego conquiro of the conquest (Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land, 2019). B. Burkhart, Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land (2019); E. Dussel, 1492: El encubrimiento del otro (1992)

    依据: AI 草稿

    恩里克·杜塞尔 › 1934–2023

批评

批评了 3

  • 勒内·笛卡尔

    批评了

    Burkhart read Descartes’ thinking I as a subject without land or culture, an example of the Western ‘delocality’ that served colonisation (Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land, 2019). B. Burkhart, Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land (2019); cf. E. Dussel, 1492: El encubrimiento del otro (1992) on ego cogito and ego conquiro

    依据: AI 草稿

    勒内·笛卡尔 › 1596–1650

  • 约翰·洛克

    批评了

    Burkhart argued that Locke’s labour theory of property made Indigenous land appear unowned, a concept framed to exclude Indigenous peoples (Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land, 2019). B. Burkhart, Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land (2019); J. Locke, Second Treatise of Government (1689), ch. V

    依据: AI 草稿

    约翰·洛克 › 1632–1704

  • 格伦·肖恩·库尔萨德

    批评了

    Burkhart objected that Coulthard traces the shift from land as relationship to land as property to state power alone, not to Western concepts of land (Transmotion, 2017). B. Burkhart, contribution to “Red Pens, White Paper: Wider Implications of Coulthard’s Call to Sovereignty”, Transmotion 3/2 (2017); G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014)

    依据: AI 草稿

    格伦·肖恩·库尔萨德 › 1974年生

作品

  • 土地是原住民的存在、认知与评价之根——并借助骗子伊克托米(Iktomi)表明,西方的“脱离地方性”是殖民化的一部分。

立场

Burkhart uses “locality” as a term of art for the way being, meaning and knowing are rooted in the land: “being-from-the-land and knowing-from-the-land”. Western philosophy, in his account from Thales to Whitehead, has sought abstract and universal concepts that float free of any place. This “delocality” is not neutral. Descartes’s thinking I is a subject without land or culture, Kant’s idea of maturity is defined against a “savage” way of thinking, and Locke’s labour theory of property made Indigenous land appear unowned: concepts framed so that they exclude Indigenous peoples from the outset. With Deloria he treats epistemology, semantics and ontology as rooted in land, and he reads debates in Native studies about authenticity and identity as products of coloniality. His “trickster methodology” uses stories of Iktomi, the Lakota Spider Trickster, and of Coyote to show how a line of reasoning entangles itself in its own web. In environmental ethics he rejects the distinction between intrinsic and instrumental value and proposes an ethics in which value plays no grounding role: right action follows from relations of kinship, and life is understood as “the capacity for kinship”. Locality, he holds, can be ignored but never removed. In a 2017 roundtable on Glen Coulthard he agreed that state recognition reproduces colonial power but argued that the turn from land as relationship to land as property comes from Western concepts of land and being, not only from the state; drawing on Enrique Dussel, he traces the Cartesian ego cogito back to the ego conquiro of the conquest.

生平与背景

Brian Burkhart, who has also published as Brian Yazzie Burkhart, is a citizen of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma with roots in the Jaybird Creek community of north-eastern Oklahoma; he spent many of his formative years in the Indian Wells community on the Navajo Nation in Arizona. His year of birth is not publicly documented. He took his doctorate in philosophy at Indiana University Bloomington. Vine Deloria Jr., whom he names as his mentor and who encouraged him to pursue an academic career, was one of his advisers. His essay “What Coyote and Thales Can Teach Us: An Outline of American Indian Epistemology” appeared in Anne Waters’s collection American Indian Thought (2004). From 2010 to 2018 he directed American Indian Studies at California State University, Northridge; since 2018 he has taught philosophy at the University of Oklahoma, where he was interim director of the Native Nations Center from 2021 to 2023. Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land was published in 2019.

其他主要作品

  • “What Coyote and Thales Can Teach Us: An Outline of American Indian Epistemology” (in American Indian Thought, ed. Anne Waters, 2004)
  • Contribution to “Red Pens, White Paper: Wider Implications of Coulthard’s Call to Sovereignty” (Transmotion, 2017)
  • Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land: A Trickster Methodology for Decolonizing Environmental Ethics and Indigenous Futures (2019)

截至 2026年11月 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开