Ernst Cassirer
Humans are symbol-making animals: we never meet reality raw but always through myth, language, art and science.
Placement
Neo-Kantian of the Marburg School: the human being is an “animal symbolicum” who builds a world in myth, language, art and science.
Key ideas
- Symbolic forms
- Animal symbolicum
- Philosophy of culture
Teachers: Hermann Cohen, Paul Natorp
Students: Hans Reichenbach
Influence
Influenced by 8
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
influenced by
Cassirer’s first book reconstructed Leibniz’s system from its mathematical and scientific foundations (Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen, 1902); he also edited Leibniz’s main writings (1904–06). E. Cassirer, Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen (1902); G. W. Leibniz, Hauptschriften zur Grundlegung der Philosophie, ed. E. Cassirer (1904–06); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: AI draft
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz › 1646–1716
Immanuel Kant
influenced by
Cassirer, trained in Marburg Neo-Kantianism, widened Kant’s critique of reason into a critique of culture covering myth, language and science (Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, 1923–29). E. Cassirer, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen I–III (1923–29); Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff (1910); Kants Leben und Lehre (1918); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO
Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804
Johann Gottfried Herder
influenced by
Cassirer read Herder’s theory of the origin of language from reflection (Besonnenheit) as a forerunner of his philosophy of symbolic forms (Philosophie der symbolischen Formen I, 1923). E. Cassirer, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen I: Die Sprache (1923); Die Philosophie der Aufklärung (1932); J. G. Herder, Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache (1772); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: AI draft
Johann Gottfried Herder › 1744–1803
Hermann Cohen studied with
studied with
Having learnt of Cohen’s writings from Simmel, Cassirer studied with Cohen at Marburg from 1896 to 1899 and took his doctorate there with a dissertation on Descartes’ analysis of mathematical and scientific knowledge. SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: AI draft
Hermann Cohen › 1842–1918
Jakob von Uexküll
influenced by
Cassirer adopted Uexküll’s functional circle of receptor and effector systems and added a ‘symbolic system’ to define the human being as animal symbolicum (An Essay on Man, 1944). E. Cassirer, An Essay on Man (1944); J. von Uexküll, Theoretische Biologie (1920); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: AI draft
Jakob von Uexküll › 1864–1944
Albert Einstein
influenced by
Cassirer interpreted Einstein’s relativity as confirming the critical idea that physical objectivity rests on invariant relations, not substances; Einstein read the manuscript (Zur Einsteinschen Relativitätstheorie, 1921). E. Cassirer, Zur Einsteinschen Relativitätstheorie. Erkenntnistheoretische Betrachtungen (1921); T. Ryckman, The Reign of Relativity (2005); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: AI draft
Albert Einstein › 1879–1955
Show all (8)Show fewer
Paul Natorp studied with
studied with
Cassirer studied at Marburg from 1896 under Cohen and Natorp and took his doctorate there in 1899. J. M. Krois, Kurzbiographie Cassirer (Universität Hamburg, digitalisate.sub.uni-hamburg.de); Mathematics Genealogy Project lists Cohen and Natorp as advisors
Evidence: AI draft
Paul Natorp › 1854–1924
Aby Warburg
influenced by
Cassirer worked from 1920 in Warburg’s library, published studies on myth in its series (Die Begriffsform im mythischen Denken, 1922) and dedicated Individuum und Kosmos (1927) to Warburg. E. Cassirer, Die Begriffsform im mythischen Denken (Studien der Bibliothek Warburg 1, 1922); Sprache und Mythos (1925); Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance (1927); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: AI draft
Aby Warburg › 1866–1929
Influenced 2
Hans Reichenbach taught
taught
Reichenbach studied physics, philosophy and mathematics in Berlin, Munich and Göttingen with, among others, Cassirer, Planck, Sommerfeld and Hilbert; his doctorate (Erlangen, 1915) was accepted by Paul Hensel, not Cassirer. Course attendance, not supervision. SEP “Hans Reichenbach”
Evidence: AI draft
Hans Reichenbach › 1891–1953
Susanne K. Langer
influenced
Langer took from Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms the idea of humans as symbol-making animals (Philosophy in a New Key, 1942) and translated his Language and Myth (1946). S. K. Langer, Philosophy in a New Key (1942); E. Cassirer, Language and Myth, tr. S. K. Langer (1946)
Evidence: AI draft
Susanne K. Langer › 1895–1985
Criticism
Mutual critique 1
Martin Heidegger ⇄ mutual
criticised
At Davos (1929) and in a review of Heidegger’s Kant book (1931) Cassirer objected that Heidegger reduced Kant’s reason to finite imagination, neglecting objective and ethical validity. E. Cassirer, ‘Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik’, Kant-Studien 36 (1931); P. E. Gordon, Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, 2010
Evidence: AI draft
criticised by
At Davos (1929) Heidegger rejected Cassirer’s neo-Kantian reading of Kant as a theory of knowledge and culture, stressing human finitude (Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, 1929). Davoser Disputation (1929), appendix to M. Heidegger, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (4th ed. 1973); Heidegger, review of Cassirer, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen II, Deutsche Literaturzeitung (1928); SEP “Ernst Cassirer”
Evidence: AI draft
Martin Heidegger › 1889–1976
Criticizes 1
Arthur de Gobineau
criticised
Cassirer traced in Gobineau’s racial theory a modern political myth that replaced ethics and history with the worship of race (The Myth of the State, 1946, ch. 16). E. Cassirer, The Myth of the State (1946), ch. 16 ‘From Hero Worship to Race Worship’
Evidence: AI draft
Arthur de Gobineau › 1816–1882
Works
Language, myth and science as forms in which the mind builds its world – Kant’s critique extended to culture.
- 1944An Essay on Man
The human being as “animal symbolicum” – a summary of the philosophy of culture written in exile.
Position
Cassirer began as a Neo-Kantian historian of science, showing how modern physics replaced the idea of substance with relations and functions. He then widened Kant’s question: we do not only know the world through science but shape it in many “symbolic forms” – myth, language, art, religion and science each build a world of meaning in their own way. The human being is therefore best defined not as a rational animal but as an “animal symbolicum.” In the famous Davos debate of 1929 he defended this humanism of culture against Heidegger. In exile he turned to the political myths of his time, above all the myth of the state.
Life & context
Cassirer was born in 1874 in Breslau into a wealthy Jewish merchant family and studied with Hermann Cohen in Marburg. After years as a lecturer in Berlin he became professor at the new University of Hamburg in 1919 and later its rector. In 1933 he left Germany, teaching in Oxford, Gothenburg and finally Yale and Columbia. He died in New York in 1945.
Further main works
- Substance and Function (1910)
- The Myth of the State (1946)
Appears in
- Journey ‘Philosophy under National Socialism’ · Stop 4 of 10
- Debate ‘Cassirer and Heidegger at Davos’
As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made