AgoraAn open square of thought

Hermann Cohen

1842–1918

A first way ina deliberate simplification – the portrait says more

Cohen held that philosophy must start from the fact of science and ask for the conditions of its validity; pure thought produces its objects from an origin. Ethics demands treating every person as an end, hence ethical socialism, and the one God of Judaism grounds a religion of reason.

Placement

German Idealism & Its Heirs · Western Europe · Epistemology, Ethics, Religion, Science

German philosopher and founder of the Marburg school of neo-Kantianism: he read Kant’s critiques as a theory of the conditions of scientific knowledge, built his own system of logic, ethics and aesthetics, and in his last years, in Berlin, interpreted Judaism as a religion of reason.

Key ideas

  • The transcendental method: starting from the fact of science
  • Origin: pure thought produces its content
  • Ethical socialism
  • Correlation of God and human being

Students: Ernst Cassirer, José Ortega y Gasset

Open in the star map

Influence

Influenced by 3

  • Maimonides

    influenced by

    Cohen read Maimonides as the rationalist of Jewish ethics (‘Characteristics of Maimonides’ Ethics’, 1908) and drew on him throughout Religion of Reason (1919). H. Cohen, “Charakteristik der Ethik Maimunis”, in W. Bacher et al. (eds.), Moses ben Maimon I (1908); Religion der Vernunft aus den Quellen des Judentums (1919); SEP “Hermann Cohen”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Maimonides › 1138–1204

  • Immanuel Kant

    influenced by ✓

    In Kant’s Theory of Experience (1871) Cohen read the first Critique as a theory of the conditions of scientific knowledge, starting from the ‘fact’ of mathematical natural science. H. Cohen, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (1871; 2nd ed. 1885); SEP “Hermann Cohen”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804

  • Friedrich Albert Lange

    influenced by ✓

    Lange was a mentor of Cohen, who received his Kantian thought partly through disagreement and became the founder of the Marburg School. SEP “Friedrich Albert Lange” (N. Hussain, L. Patton, E. Widmer), §4

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Friedrich Albert Lange › 1828–1875

Influenced 4

  • Paul Natorp

    influenced ✓

    Natorp became, with Cohen, the second leading voice of the Marburg School and shared its transcendental method. SEP “Paul Natorp” (A. Kim), §1; SEP “Neo-Kantianism” (J. Heis), §2 (habilitation under Cohen, 1881)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Paul Natorp › 1854–1924

  • Ernst Cassirer taught

    taught

    Having learnt of Cohen’s writings from Simmel, Cassirer studied with Cohen at Marburg from 1896 to 1899 and took his doctorate there with a dissertation on Descartes’ analysis of mathematical and scientific knowledge. SEP “Ernst Cassirer”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Ernst Cassirer › 1874–1945

  • José Ortega y Gasset taught

    taught ✓

    On a state grant Ortega went from Berlin to Marburg in 1907, where he studied Kant and the history of philosophy with Cohen and psychology and pedagogy with Natorp; he returned to Marburg in 1911. SEP “José Ortega y Gasset”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    José Ortega y Gasset › 1883–1955

  • Walter Benjamin

    influenced

    Benjamin read Cohen’s Kants Theorie der Erfahrung critically with Scholem in 1918; Astrid Deuber-Mankowsky traces Cohen’s concepts as the foil of Benjamin’s early theory of knowledge. G. Scholem, Walter Benjamin – die Geschichte einer Freundschaft (1975); A. Deuber-Mankowsky, Der frühe Walter Benjamin und Hermann Cohen (2000)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Walter Benjamin › 1892–1940

Criticism

Criticized by 1

  • Martin Buber

    criticised by

    Buber held that Cohen’s God, conceived as an idea, cannot be loved, and read Cohen’s late love of God as exceeding his system (Eclipse of God, 1952). M. Buber, “The Love of God and the Idea of Deity”, in Eclipse of God (1952); M. Buber, “Begriffe und Wirklichkeit”, Der Jude 1 (1916)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Martin Buber › 1878–1965

Works

  • Reading of the Critique of Pure Reason that founded the Marburg school: the a priori is not an innate equipment of the mind but the set of conditions that make experience, as scientific knowledge, possible; reworked in 1885 into the “transcendental method”.

  • Posthumous main work of his philosophy of religion: from the Bible, the prophets, rabbinic literature and Maimonides, Cohen develops monotheism as a religion of reason centred on the correlation of God and human being, on repentance and on compassion for the fellow human.

Position

Cohen is on the map as the founder of the Marburg school of neo-Kantianism and as a modern Jewish philosopher. He read Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason” not as a psychology of the knowing mind but as a theory of the conditions that make scientific knowledge possible: the “transcendental method” starts from the fact of mathematical natural science and asks for the principles on which its objectivity rests. In his own system – “Logic of Pure Knowledge” (1902), “Ethics of Pure Will” (1904), “Aesthetics of Pure Feeling” (1912) – he went beyond Kant by giving up a sensibility that receives what is given: pure thought produces its content from an “origin”, a principle he developed from the infinitesimal calculus. His ethics took Kant’s formula of humanity as the basis of a democratic “ethical socialism”; in 1896 he called Kant “the true and actual originator of German socialism”. In his late works he read Judaism, from the prophets to Maimonides, as the historical source of a religion of reason: the one God guarantees the ethical ideal, and God and human being stand in “correlation”, in which the individual becomes a self through repentance and the other becomes a fellow human through compassion. He opposed Zionism, holding that Jews should remain citizens of their countries; Buber replied in 1916. Cassirer, his student, carried the Marburg approach into a philosophy of culture; Rosenzweig took up his philosophy of religion.

Life & context

Hermann Cohen was born on 4 July 1842 in Coswig in Anhalt, the son of a cantor. He studied at the Jewish Theological Seminary in Breslau, intending to become a rabbi, then philosophy in Breslau and Berlin, and took his doctorate in Halle in 1865. His “Kant’s Theory of Experience” (1871) won the support of Friedrich Albert Lange, who brought him to Marburg: he qualified there in 1873, became extraordinary professor in 1875 and in 1876 succeeded Lange to the chair. With Paul Natorp he made Marburg a centre of neo-Kantianism; among the students were Ernst Cassirer, Nicolai Hartmann and José Ortega y Gasset. In 1880 he answered Heinrich von Treitschke’s antisemitic attacks with “Ein Bekenntnis in der Judenfrage”. After retiring in 1912 he taught at the Lehranstalt für die Wissenschaft des Judentums in Berlin, where Franz Rosenzweig attended his lectures. He died in Berlin on 4 April 1918.

Further main works

  • Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (1871; 2nd ed. 1885)
  • Das Prinzip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte (1883)
  • Logik der reinen Erkenntnis (1902)
  • Ethik des reinen Willens (1904)
  • Ästhetik des reinen Gefühls (1912)
  • Religion der Vernunft aus den Quellen des Judentums (1919)

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made

Open in the star map