ديبيش تشاكرابارتي
الأفكار الأوروبية لا غنى عنها لكنها لا تكفي لفهم بقية العالم – ويُلزم تغيّرُ المناخ المؤرخين بأن يفكروا في البشر بوصفهم قوةً من قوى الطبيعة.
التموضع
مؤرخ في شيكاغو من مجموعة دراسات التابع: المفاهيم الأوروبية «لا غنى عنها وغير كافية» لتواريخ غير غربية – والتغير المناخي يجعل البشرية قوة جيولوجية فيطوي الفرق بين التاريخ الطبيعي والتاريخ الإنساني.
الأفكار الرئيسة
- أقلمة أوروبا
- التاريخ 1 والتاريخ 2
- مناخ التاريخ
التأثير
تأثّر بـ 3
كارل ماركس
تأثّر بـ
Chakrabarty took from Marx’s Grundrisse the history posited by capital (‘History 1’) and set against it pasts not belonging to capital’s life-process (‘History 2’) (Provincializing Europe, 2000). D. Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe (2000); K. Marx, Grundrisse (1857–58; publ. 1939–41)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
كارل ماركس › 1818–1883
مارتن هايدغر
تأثّر بـ
In Provincializing Europe (2000) Chakrabarty paired Marx’s abstract categories with Heidegger’s thinking of belonging and being-in-the-world to write histories of life-worlds not subsumed by capital. D. Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (2000)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
مارتن هايدغر › 1889–1976
أنطونيو غرامشي
تأثّر بـ
As a member of the Subaltern Studies collective, named after Gramsci’s ‘subaltern classes’, Chakrabarty studied the limits of class solidarity among Bengal’s jute workers (Rethinking Working-Class History, 1989). D. Chakrabarty, Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal 1890–1940 (1989); R. Guha (ed.), Subaltern Studies I (1982), preface; A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere (1929–35)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
أنطونيو غرامشي › 1891–1937
الموقف
“Provincializing Europe” asks how to write the history of places like India with concepts – the state, citizenship, capital, progress – that were developed in Europe and claim universal validity. Such concepts, Chakrabarty argues, are “indispensable and inadequate”: indispensable because modern politics everywhere is conducted in their terms, inadequate because they present non-European histories as stories of lack, of a “not yet”, a waiting room of history. Provincialising Europe does not mean rejecting European thought but showing its limits. He pairs Marx, the thinker of abstract universal categories, with Heidegger, the thinker of belonging and lived worlds, and distinguishes the universal history posited by capital (“History 1”) from the many pasts that do not serve its logic (“History 2”). His essay “The Climate of History: Four Theses” turned to climate change, which collapses the old distinction between natural and human history: humans have become a geological force, and historians must now think of humanity also as a species and of the planet as a frame not centred on humans – alongside, not instead of, the history of capitalism and global inequality.
الحياة والسياق
Dipesh Chakrabarty (born 1948 in Calcutta) studied physics at Presidency College, Calcutta, and management at the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta before turning to history; he took his doctorate at the Australian National University in 1984. He was a founding member of the Subaltern Studies collective around Ranajit Guha, which from 1982 rewrote South Asian history from the perspective of subordinated groups. After teaching at the University of Melbourne he moved in 1995 to the University of Chicago, where he is Lawrence A. Kimpton Distinguished Service Professor of History and of South Asian Languages and Civilizations. He received the Toynbee Prize in 2014 and the Tagore Memorial Prize of the Government of West Bengal in 2019.
الأعمال الرئيسة
- Rethinking Working-Class History (1989)
- Provincializing Europe (2000)
- Habitations of Modernity (2002)
- The Climate of History: Four Theses (2009)
- The Climate of History in a Planetary Age (2021)
- One Planet, Many Worlds (2023)
يرد في
بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora