Agora思想的公共广场

迪佩什·查克拉巴蒂

1948年生

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

欧洲的观念对于理解世界其他地方不可或缺，却又不够用——而气候变化迫使历史学家把人类看作一种自然力量。

定位

结构主义与后结构主义 · 南亚 · 社会与历史, 科学, 政治与法

芝加哥大学的历史学家，属于属下研究小组：欧洲的概念对于非西方的历史“不可或缺而又不够用”——而气候变化使人类成为一种地质力量，使自然史与人类史相互坍缩。

核心思想

  • 把欧洲地方化
  • 历史1与历史2
  • 历史的气候

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 3

  • 卡尔·马克思

    受其影响

    Chakrabarty took from Marx’s Grundrisse the history posited by capital (‘History 1’) and set against it pasts not belonging to capital’s life-process (‘History 2’) (Provincializing Europe, 2000). D. Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe (2000); K. Marx, Grundrisse (1857–58; publ. 1939–41)

    依据: AI 草稿

    卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883

  • 马丁·海德格尔

    受其影响

    In Provincializing Europe (2000) Chakrabarty paired Marx’s abstract categories with Heidegger’s thinking of belonging and being-in-the-world to write histories of life-worlds not subsumed by capital. D. Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (2000)

    依据: AI 草稿

    马丁·海德格尔 › 1889–1976

  • 安东尼奥·葛兰西

    受其影响

    As a member of the Subaltern Studies collective, named after Gramsci’s ‘subaltern classes’, Chakrabarty studied the limits of class solidarity among Bengal’s jute workers (Rethinking Working-Class History, 1989). D. Chakrabarty, Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal 1890–1940 (1989); R. Guha (ed.), Subaltern Studies I (1982), preface; A. Gramsci, Quaderni del carcere (1929–35)

    依据: AI 草稿

    安东尼奥·葛兰西 › 1891–1937

立场

“Provincializing Europe” asks how to write the history of places like India with concepts – the state, citizenship, capital, progress – that were developed in Europe and claim universal validity. Such concepts, Chakrabarty argues, are “indispensable and inadequate”: indispensable because modern politics everywhere is conducted in their terms, inadequate because they present non-European histories as stories of lack, of a “not yet”, a waiting room of history. Provincialising Europe does not mean rejecting European thought but showing its limits. He pairs Marx, the thinker of abstract universal categories, with Heidegger, the thinker of belonging and lived worlds, and distinguishes the universal history posited by capital (“History 1”) from the many pasts that do not serve its logic (“History 2”). His essay “The Climate of History: Four Theses” turned to climate change, which collapses the old distinction between natural and human history: humans have become a geological force, and historians must now think of humanity also as a species and of the planet as a frame not centred on humans – alongside, not instead of, the history of capitalism and global inequality.

生平与背景

Dipesh Chakrabarty (born 1948 in Calcutta) studied physics at Presidency College, Calcutta, and management at the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta before turning to history; he took his doctorate at the Australian National University in 1984. He was a founding member of the Subaltern Studies collective around Ranajit Guha, which from 1982 rewrote South Asian history from the perspective of subordinated groups. After teaching at the University of Melbourne he moved in 1995 to the University of Chicago, where he is Lawrence A. Kimpton Distinguished Service Professor of History and of South Asian Languages and Civilizations. He received the Toynbee Prize in 2014 and the Tagore Memorial Prize of the Government of West Bengal in 2019.

主要作品

  • Rethinking Working-Class History (1989)
  • Provincializing Europe (2000)
  • Habitations of Modernity (2002)
  • The Climate of History: Four Theses (2009)
  • The Climate of History in a Planetary Age (2021)
  • One Planet, Many Worlds (2023)

出现在

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开