براين بيركهارت
ينمو المعنى والكينونة والمعرفة من علاقاتنا بالأرض؛ والفلسفة التي تقطعها عن أي مكان تقصي الشعوب الأصلية منذ البداية – وأخلاق القرابة لا تحتاج إلى ترتيب القيم في مراتب.
التموضع
فيلسوف من الشيروكي نشأ في أمة النافاهو، في جامعة أوكلاهوما: الوجود والمعنى والمعرفة متجذرة في الأرض («المحلية»)؛ والفلسفة الغربية تعاملها كأنها منفصلة عنها، وقد خدم هذا «اللامحلية» الاستعمار.
الأفكار الرئيسة
- المحلية واللامحلية
- منهجية المحتال (Trickster)
- أخلاق بلا قيمة: القرابة بدل القيمة الذاتية
- الأخلاق البيئية الأصلانية
الأساتذة: فاين ديلوريا الابن
التأثير
تأثّر بـ 2
فاين ديلوريا الابن تتلمذ على
تتلمذ على
A university profile calls Deloria Burkhart’s mentor; Burkhart’s own academic profile lists Deloria among the advisers of his doctorate at Indiana University, beside Paul Vincent Spade and James G. Hart. A mentorship, not documented as classroom teaching. California State University, Northridge, College of Humanities newsletter, “University Research Fellow Dr. Brian Burkhart” (2014); B. Burkhart, profile on academia.edu
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
فاين ديلوريا الابن › 1933–2005
إنريكي دوسل
تأثّر بـ
Drawing on Enrique Dussel, Burkhart traces the Cartesian ego cogito back to the ego conquiro of the conquest (Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land, 2019). B. Burkhart, Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land (2019); E. Dussel, 1492: El encubrimiento del otro (1992)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
إنريكي دوسل › 1934–2023
النقد
ينتقد 3
رينيه ديكارت
انتقد
Burkhart read Descartes’ thinking I as a subject without land or culture, an example of the Western ‘delocality’ that served colonisation (Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land, 2019). B. Burkhart, Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land (2019); cf. E. Dussel, 1492: El encubrimiento del otro (1992) on ego cogito and ego conquiro
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
رينيه ديكارت › 1596–1650
جون لوك
انتقد
Burkhart argued that Locke’s labour theory of property made Indigenous land appear unowned, a concept framed to exclude Indigenous peoples (Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land, 2019). B. Burkhart, Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land (2019); J. Locke, Second Treatise of Government (1689), ch. V
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
جون لوك › 1632–1704
غلين شون كولثارد
انتقد
Burkhart objected that Coulthard traces the shift from land as relationship to land as property to state power alone, not to Western concepts of land (Transmotion, 2017). B. Burkhart, contribution to “Red Pens, White Paper: Wider Implications of Coulthard’s Call to Sovereignty”, Transmotion 3/2 (2017); G. S. Coulthard, Red Skin, White Masks (2014)
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
غلين شون كولثارد › وُلد 1974
الأعمال
الأرض أصلًا للوجود والمعرفة والتقييم عند الشعوب الأصلية – و«اللامحلية» الغربية جزءًا من الاستعمار، يوضحها المحتال إكتومي.
الموقف
Burkhart uses “locality” as a term of art for the way being, meaning and knowing are rooted in the land: “being-from-the-land and knowing-from-the-land”. Western philosophy, in his account from Thales to Whitehead, has sought abstract and universal concepts that float free of any place. This “delocality” is not neutral. Descartes’s thinking I is a subject without land or culture, Kant’s idea of maturity is defined against a “savage” way of thinking, and Locke’s labour theory of property made Indigenous land appear unowned: concepts framed so that they exclude Indigenous peoples from the outset. With Deloria he treats epistemology, semantics and ontology as rooted in land, and he reads debates in Native studies about authenticity and identity as products of coloniality. His “trickster methodology” uses stories of Iktomi, the Lakota Spider Trickster, and of Coyote to show how a line of reasoning entangles itself in its own web. In environmental ethics he rejects the distinction between intrinsic and instrumental value and proposes an ethics in which value plays no grounding role: right action follows from relations of kinship, and life is understood as “the capacity for kinship”. Locality, he holds, can be ignored but never removed. In a 2017 roundtable on Glen Coulthard he agreed that state recognition reproduces colonial power but argued that the turn from land as relationship to land as property comes from Western concepts of land and being, not only from the state; drawing on Enrique Dussel, he traces the Cartesian ego cogito back to the ego conquiro of the conquest.
الحياة والسياق
Brian Burkhart, who has also published as Brian Yazzie Burkhart, is a citizen of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma with roots in the Jaybird Creek community of north-eastern Oklahoma; he spent many of his formative years in the Indian Wells community on the Navajo Nation in Arizona. His year of birth is not publicly documented. He took his doctorate in philosophy at Indiana University Bloomington. Vine Deloria Jr., whom he names as his mentor and who encouraged him to pursue an academic career, was one of his advisers. His essay “What Coyote and Thales Can Teach Us: An Outline of American Indian Epistemology” appeared in Anne Waters’s collection American Indian Thought (2004). From 2010 to 2018 he directed American Indian Studies at California State University, Northridge; since 2018 he has taught philosophy at the University of Oklahoma, where he was interim director of the Native Nations Center from 2021 to 2023. Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land was published in 2019.
أعمال رئيسة أخرى
- “What Coyote and Thales Can Teach Us: An Outline of American Indian Epistemology” (in American Indian Thought, ed. Anne Waters, 2004)
- Contribution to “Red Pens, White Paper: Wider Implications of Coulthard’s Call to Sovereignty” (Transmotion, 2017)
بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora