Agora思想的公共广场

乌陀衍那

约950–1020年

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

世界的秩序证明有一位创造者上帝，而且存在一个持久的自我——这两点都是针对否认它们的佛教徒而言的。

定位

南亚与藏传哲学 · 南亚 · 逻辑学, 宗教, 形而上学

正理派逻辑学家：他的《正理花束》（“理性的一捧花”）提出了印度古典的创造神论证，反驳佛教徒和弥曼差学者，也反驳佛教否认持久自我的主张。

核心思想

  • 神（Ishvara）存在的证明
  • 为持久的自我辩护
  • 正理派与胜论派的融合

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 迦那陀

    受其影响

    Udayana commented on Prashastapada’s exposition of Kanada’s Vaisheshika in his Kiranavali and joined its categories with Nyaya logic in one system. Udayana, Kiranavali; K. H. Potter (ed.), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies II (1977)

    依据: AI 草稿

    迦那陀 › 约公元前200—前130年年

  • 足目·乔达摩

    受其影响

    Udayana worked within the tradition of the Nyaya-sutra, writing a subcommentary on its commentaries and using its theory of inference for his proofs of God (Nyayakusumanjali). Udayana, Nyayakusumanjali; K. H. Potter (ed.), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies II (1977)

    依据: AI 草稿

    足目·乔达摩 › 约120–190年

影响了 1

  • 甘盖沙

    影响了

    Gangesha built on Udayana’s synthesis of Nyaya and Vaisheshika and took up his proofs of God in the Tattvacintamani, the founding text of Navya-Nyaya. Gangesha, Tattvacintamani; K. H. Potter & S. Bhattacharyya (eds.), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies VI (1993)

    依据: AI 草稿

    甘盖沙 › 约1300–1360年

批评

批评了 2

  • 鸠摩利罗·跋陀

    批评了

    Udayana argued against Kumarila’s Mimamsa that the Veda needs an author, God, and that its validity derives from its source rather than being intrinsic (Nyayakusumanjali). Udayana, Nyāyakusumāñjali; K. H. Potter (ed.), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies II, 1977

    依据: AI 草稿

    鸠摩利罗·跋陀 › 约590–650年

  • 法称

    批评了

    Udayana defended an enduring self against Dharmakirti’s school, rejecting momentariness and the denial of external objects (Atmatattvaviveka) and its arguments against God (Nyayakusumanjali). Udayana, Ātmatattvaviveka; Nyāyakusumāñjali; K. H. Potter (ed.), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies II, 1977

    依据: AI 草稿

    法称 › 约600–660年

作品

立场

Udayana fused the realist schools of Nyaya and Vaisheshika almost into one system and defended them against the Buddhists. In the Nyayakusumanjali he gave the classical Indian arguments for God (Ishvara): the world is an effect and so needs an intelligent maker; the first combination of atoms needs a guiding mind; the conventions of language and the authority of the Veda need an original author. He thus answered the Mimamsakas, for whom the Veda needs no author and God is superfluous. In the Atmatattvaviveka he attacked the Buddhist doctrines of momentariness and no-self and defended an enduring self. Gangesha built directly on his work, which prepared Navya-Nyaya.

生平与背景

Udayana was a Brahmin logician from Mithila in northern Bihar, an old centre of Nyaya learning. Little is known of his life. One of his works, the Lakshanavali, bears a date corresponding to 984 CE, which places him in the late 10th century; other scholars, noting his replies to Buddhist logicians active around 1000, date him to the 11th century.

其他主要作品

  • Discernment of the Truth about the Self (Atmatattvaviveka, late 10th or 11th century)
  • Lakshanavali (dated 984 CE)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开