فرانسيسكو سانشيز
لا شيء يُعرف معرفة تامة: فالأشياء لا متناهية ومترابطة، والحواس تخدع، والتعريفات لا تشرح إلا الأسماء؛ والسبيل الأمين أن نعترف بجهلنا وأن نطلب ما يمكن من المعرفة بالملاحظة والتجربة والحكم.
التموضع
طبيب وفيلسوف – يُختلف في كونه برتغالي المولد أم إسباني – تعلّم في بوردو وروما ومونبولييه ودرّس في تولوز؛ ورأى في «أن لا شيء يُعلم» (1581) أن المعرفة التامة بالأشياء عبر عللها فوق طاقة الإنسان، وأوصى بالملاحظة والحكم بدلًا منها.
الأفكار الرئيسة
- أن لا شيء يُعلم
- نقد العلم الأرسطي
- حدود الحواس والعقل
- الملاحظة والتجربة
التأثير
أثّر في 1
بيير بايل
أثّر في
Bayle gave Francisco Sanches an article in his Historical and Critical Dictionary (1697), calling the author of That Nothing Is Known (1581) a ‘great Pyrrhonist’. P. Bayle, Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697), “Sanchez”; F. Sanches, Quod nihil scitur (1581); SEP “Francisco Sanches”
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
بيير بايل › 1647–1706
النقد
ينتقد 1
أرسطو
انتقد
Sanches attacked the Aristotelian ideal of science as demonstration from definitions and causes, concluding that nothing can be known with certainty (Quod nihil scitur, 1581). F. Sanches, Quod nihil scitur (1581), ed. E. Limbrick & D. F. S. Thomson, 1988
التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
أرسطو › 384–322 ق.م
الأعمال
يجادل ضد المثال الأرسطي للعلم بأن طبيعة الأشياء لا يمكن أن يعرفها العقل البشري معرفة كاملة، ويقترح منهجًا متواضعًا للملاحظة والحكم.
الموقف
Sanches is on the map as one of the main representatives of Renaissance scepticism, alongside Montaigne. In “That Nothing Is Known” he directed doubt not at faith or morals but at the claims of Aristotelian science. Knowledge in the full sense, grasping a thing through its causes, would require knowing everything, since all things are connected; but things are infinite and changing, the senses are coarse and deceptive, and the mind depends on them. Definitions only explain names, and syllogisms derive nothing that was not already assumed. What remains is a more modest knowledge based on careful observation and experience (experimentum) and on judgement (iudicium), as he practised it as a physician; a promised work on method never appeared. Bayle devoted an article to him in his Dictionary and called him a great Pyrrhonist. Richard Popkin’s history of scepticism placed him among the sources of the sceptical crisis to which, on Popkin’s account, Descartes responded. Whether Sanches was a Pyrrhonist or rather a mitigated sceptic who wanted to reform science is debated; his book appeared at almost the same time as Montaigne’s “Essays” (1580), but a connection between the two is not documented. Modern study of his work owes much to the edition and translation by Elaine Limbrick and Douglas Thomson (1988).
الحياة والسياق
Francisco Sanches was born in 1551, in Braga in Portugal or, according to other sources, in Tui in Galicia; his origin has long been disputed. His family, New Christians of Jewish descent, moved to Bordeaux when he was a child, and he attended the Collège de Guyenne there. He studied medicine in Rome and then in Montpellier, where he took his doctorate in 1574. He settled in Toulouse and practised there as a physician, among other places at the Hôtel-Dieu Saint-Jacques. In 1585 he obtained a chair of philosophy at the University of Toulouse and in 1612 a chair of medicine. Besides “That Nothing Is Known” (Lyon 1581) he published a Latin poem on the comet of 1577 and a commentary on Aristotle’s treatise on divination in sleep. He died in Toulouse on 16 November 1623. His medical works appeared posthumously in Toulouse in 1636, and his philosophical treatises in Rotterdam in 1649.
أعمال رئيسة أخرى
- Poem on the Comet of 1577 (Carmen de cometa anni MDLXXVII, 1578)
- On Divination in Sleep, on Aristotle (De divinatione per somnum, ad Aristotelem, 1585)
- Medical Works (Opera medica, 1636)
- Philosophical Treatises (Tractatus philosophici, 1649)
بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora