Francisco Sanches
Nic nie jest poznane doskonale: rzeczy są nieskończone i wzajemnie powiązane, zmysły zwodzą, a definicje wyjaśniają tylko nazwy; uczciwa droga to przyznać się do niewiedzy i szukać wiedzy możliwej przez obserwację, doświadczenie i osąd.
Umiejscowienie
Lekarz i filozof – czy z urodzenia Portugalczyk, czy Hiszpan, jest sporne – kształcony w Bordeaux, Rzymie i Montpellier, który nauczał w Tuluzie; w „Quod nihil scitur” (1581) dowodził, że doskonała wiedza o rzeczach przez ich przyczyny jest poza zasięgiem człowieka, i zalecał zamiast niej obserwację i osąd.
Kluczowe idee
- Że nic nie wiadomo
- Krytyka nauki arystotelesowskiej
- Granice zmysłów i rozumu
- Obserwacja i doświadczenie
Wpływ
Wpływ na 1
Pierre Bayle
wpływ na
Bayle gave Francisco Sanches an article in his Historical and Critical Dictionary (1697), calling the author of That Nothing Is Known (1581) a ‘great Pyrrhonist’. P. Bayle, Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697), “Sanchez”; F. Sanches, Quod nihil scitur (1581); SEP “Francisco Sanches”
Źródło: szkic AI
Pierre Bayle › 1647–1706
Krytyka
Krytykuje 1
Arystoteles
krytykuje
Sanches attacked the Aristotelian ideal of science as demonstration from definitions and causes, concluding that nothing can be known with certainty (Quod nihil scitur, 1581). F. Sanches, Quod nihil scitur (1581), ed. E. Limbrick & D. F. S. Thomson, 1988
Źródło: szkic AI
Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.
Dzieła
Dowodzi przeciw arystotelesowskiemu ideałowi nauki, że natury rzeczy nie może doskonale poznać ludzki umysł, i proponuje skromną metodę obserwacji i osądu.
Stanowisko
Sanches is on the map as one of the main representatives of Renaissance scepticism, alongside Montaigne. In “That Nothing Is Known” he directed doubt not at faith or morals but at the claims of Aristotelian science. Knowledge in the full sense, grasping a thing through its causes, would require knowing everything, since all things are connected; but things are infinite and changing, the senses are coarse and deceptive, and the mind depends on them. Definitions only explain names, and syllogisms derive nothing that was not already assumed. What remains is a more modest knowledge based on careful observation and experience (experimentum) and on judgement (iudicium), as he practised it as a physician; a promised work on method never appeared. Bayle devoted an article to him in his Dictionary and called him a great Pyrrhonist. Richard Popkin’s history of scepticism placed him among the sources of the sceptical crisis to which, on Popkin’s account, Descartes responded. Whether Sanches was a Pyrrhonist or rather a mitigated sceptic who wanted to reform science is debated; his book appeared at almost the same time as Montaigne’s “Essays” (1580), but a connection between the two is not documented. Modern study of his work owes much to the edition and translation by Elaine Limbrick and Douglas Thomson (1988).
Życie i kontekst
Francisco Sanches was born in 1551, in Braga in Portugal or, according to other sources, in Tui in Galicia; his origin has long been disputed. His family, New Christians of Jewish descent, moved to Bordeaux when he was a child, and he attended the Collège de Guyenne there. He studied medicine in Rome and then in Montpellier, where he took his doctorate in 1574. He settled in Toulouse and practised there as a physician, among other places at the Hôtel-Dieu Saint-Jacques. In 1585 he obtained a chair of philosophy at the University of Toulouse and in 1612 a chair of medicine. Besides “That Nothing Is Known” (Lyon 1581) he published a Latin poem on the comet of 1577 and a commentary on Aristotle’s treatise on divination in sleep. He died in Toulouse on 16 November 1623. His medical works appeared posthumously in Toulouse in 1636, and his philosophical treatises in Rotterdam in 1649.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Poem on the Comet of 1577 (Carmen de cometa anni MDLXXVII, 1578)
- That Nothing Is Known (Quod nihil scitur, 1581)
- On Divination in Sleep, on Aristotle (De divinatione per somnum, ad Aristotelem, 1585)
- Medical Works (Opera medica, 1636)
- Philosophical Treatises (Tractatus philosophici, 1649)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora