मारुयामा मासाओ
युद्धकालीन जापान एक ऐसी प्रणाली था जिसमें सब आज्ञा मानते थे और कोई उत्तरदायी नहीं था; लोकतंत्र को ऐसे नागरिक चाहिए जो सामाजिक व्यवस्था को ऐसी चीज़ के रूप में देखें जिसे लोग बनाते हैं और बदल सकते हैं।
पृष्ठभूमि
टोक्यो विश्वविद्यालय के राजनीति-वैज्ञानिक जिनके निबंध “अति-राष्ट्रवाद का सिद्धांत और मनोविज्ञान” (1946) ने युद्धकालीन राज्य का विश्लेषण ऐसी प्रणाली के रूप में किया जिसमें किसी पर उत्तरदायित्व नहीं था; तोकुगावा चिंतन के अपने अध्ययनों में उन्होंने राजनीति के नैतिकता से आधुनिक पृथक्करण का आरंभ ओग्यू सोराई तक खोजा और जापान में युद्धोत्तर लोकतांत्रिक चिंतन की एक प्रमुख आवाज़ बने।
मुख्य विचार
- उत्तरदायित्व-हीनता की प्रणाली
- ओग्यू सोराई और राजनीति का नैतिकता से पृथक्करण
- सामाजिक व्यवस्था के दो दृष्टिकोणों के रूप में प्रकृति बनाम आविष्कार (शिज़ेन और साकुइ)
- स्थायी क्रांति के रूप में लोकतंत्र
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 4
ओग्यू सोराई
जिनसे प्रभावित
Maruyama argued that Ogyū Sorai’s view of the Way as made by the sages, separating politics from private morality, began modern political thought in Japan (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
ओग्यू सोराई › 1666–1728
गेऑर्ग विल्हेल्म फ़्रीडरिश हेगल
जिनसे प्रभावित
Maruyama took Hegel’s picture of China as an unhistorical, stagnant empire as his starting question, aiming to show that Tokugawa Japan developed modern thought from within (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), introduction; tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
गेऑर्ग विल्हेल्म फ़्रीडरिश हेगल › 1770–1831
मैक्स वेबर
जिनसे प्रभावित
Maruyama drew on Weber’s types of rule and his theory of rationalisation in his essays on Japanese politics (Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics, 1956–57). Maruyama Masao, Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō (1956–57), tr. I. Morris, Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (1963); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan (1996)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
मैक्स वेबर › 1864–1920
कार्ल मानहाइम
जिनसे प्रभावित
Maruyama used Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge (Ideology and Utopia) as a method for intellectual history, relating Tokugawa doctrines to the social positions that carried them (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan: Maruyama Masao and the Search for Autonomy (1996)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
कार्ल मानहाइम › 1893–1947
कृतियाँ
मई 1946 में पत्रिका सेकाई में प्रकाशित निबंध जिसने उन्हें प्रसिद्ध किया: शाही राज्य ने स्वयं मूल्यों पर अधिकार का दावा किया, और चूँकि हर कोई अधिकार सम्राट से निकटता से पाता था, किसी पर उत्तरदायित्व नहीं था।
1940–44 में लिखे निबंध: ओग्यू सोराई के माध्यम से, जिन्होंने सामाजिक व्यवस्था को मनुष्यों की रचना माना, और मोतूरी नोरिनागा की राष्ट्रीय विद्या के माध्यम से झू शी की रूढ़ि का विघटन।
मत
Maruyama’s essay on ultra-nationalism argued that the prewar Japanese state, unlike the modern European state, did not leave questions of value to the conscience of individuals but claimed to embody value itself in the emperor. Since everyone derived authority from their distance to the emperor, pressure from above was passed downwards – a “transfer of oppression” – and in the end no one regarded themselves as responsible; in a later essay he called this a “system of irresponsibility”. His studies of the Tokugawa period traced how Ogyū Sorai broke with the Zhu Xi orthodoxy: instead of seeing social order as part of nature (shizen), Sorai saw the Way as made by the sages (sakui), which opened the idea that order is a human construction and can be changed. Maruyama used Weber’s sociology and Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge, and he took Hegel’s picture of an unhistorical, stagnant China as a challenge to show that Japan had developed modern forms of thought from within. In “Japanese Thought” (1961) he described a culture of closed “octopus pots” in which ideas accumulate without being confronted. Later critics, including Yoshimoto Takaaki and postcolonial scholars, objected that he measured Japan against an idealised Europe; his defence of democracy as a “permanent revolution” remains a reference point.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Maruyama Masao was born on 22 March 1914 in Osaka, the son of the journalist Maruyama Kanji. As a high-school student in 1933 he was briefly detained by the police for attending a meeting of a left-wing study group. He studied law at Tokyo Imperial University and in 1937 became the assistant of the political philosopher Nanbara Shigeru; between 1940 and 1944 he wrote his essays on the political thought of the Tokugawa period. In 1944 he was drafted into the army and served in Korea and then in Hiroshima, where he experienced the atomic bombing on 6 August 1945. His essay “Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism”, published in May 1946, made him the leading intellectual of postwar democracy. He was professor at the University of Tokyo from 1950. In 1960 he took part in the protests against the renewal of the security treaty with the United States. During the student protests of 1968–69 his research office was occupied, and he left the university early in 1971. He then devoted himself to the history of Japanese thought and to studies of Fukuzawa Yukichi. He died in Tokyo on 15 August 1996.
अन्य प्रमुख कृतियाँ
- Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1952)
- Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism (1946)
- Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō, 1956–57)
- Japanese Thought (Nihon no shisō, 1961)
- Reading Fukuzawa’s Outline of a Theory of Civilization (1986)
- Loyalty and Rebellion (Chūsei to hangyaku, 1992)
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है