AgoraAn open square of thought

Maruyama Masao

1914–1996

A first way ina deliberate simplification – the portrait says more

Wartime Japan was a system in which everyone obeyed and no one was responsible; democracy needs citizens who see social order as something people make and can change.

Placement

East Asian Philosophy · East Asia · Politics & Law, Society & History

Political scientist at Tokyo University whose essay “Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism” (1946) analysed the wartime state as a system in which no one bore responsibility; in his studies of Tokugawa thought he traced the beginnings of a modern separation of politics from morality to Ogyū Sorai and became a leading voice of postwar democratic thought in Japan.

Key ideas

  • System of irresponsibility
  • Ogyū Sorai and the separation of politics from morality
  • Nature versus invention (shizen and sakui) as views of social order
  • Democracy as permanent revolution

Open in the star map

Influence

Influenced by 4

  • Ogyū Sorai

    influenced by

    Maruyama argued that Ogyū Sorai’s view of the Way as made by the sages, separating politics from private morality, began modern political thought in Japan (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Ogyū Sorai › 1666–1728

  • Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

    influenced by

    Maruyama took Hegel’s picture of China as an unhistorical, stagnant empire as his starting question, aiming to show that Tokugawa Japan developed modern thought from within (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), introduction; tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831

  • Max Weber

    influenced by

    Maruyama drew on Weber’s types of rule and his theory of rationalisation in his essays on Japanese politics (Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics, 1956–57). Maruyama Masao, Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō (1956–57), tr. I. Morris, Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (1963); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan (1996)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Max Weber › 1864–1920

  • Karl Mannheim

    influenced by

    Maruyama used Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge (Ideology and Utopia) as a method for intellectual history, relating Tokugawa doctrines to the social positions that carried them (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan: Maruyama Masao and the Search for Autonomy (1996)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Karl Mannheim › 1893–1947

Works

  • The essay, published in the journal Sekai in May 1946, that made him famous: the imperial state claimed authority over values themselves, and since everyone derived authority from closeness to the emperor, no one bore responsibility.

  • Essays written 1940–44: the dissolution of Zhu Xi orthodoxy through Ogyū Sorai, who saw social order as made by human beings, and through the National Learning of Motoori Norinaga.

Position

Maruyama’s essay on ultra-nationalism argued that the prewar Japanese state, unlike the modern European state, did not leave questions of value to the conscience of individuals but claimed to embody value itself in the emperor. Since everyone derived authority from their distance to the emperor, pressure from above was passed downwards – a “transfer of oppression” – and in the end no one regarded themselves as responsible; in a later essay he called this a “system of irresponsibility”. His studies of the Tokugawa period traced how Ogyū Sorai broke with the Zhu Xi orthodoxy: instead of seeing social order as part of nature (shizen), Sorai saw the Way as made by the sages (sakui), which opened the idea that order is a human construction and can be changed. Maruyama used Weber’s sociology and Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge, and he took Hegel’s picture of an unhistorical, stagnant China as a challenge to show that Japan had developed modern forms of thought from within. In “Japanese Thought” (1961) he described a culture of closed “octopus pots” in which ideas accumulate without being confronted. Later critics, including Yoshimoto Takaaki and postcolonial scholars, objected that he measured Japan against an idealised Europe; his defence of democracy as a “permanent revolution” remains a reference point.

Life & context

Maruyama Masao was born on 22 March 1914 in Osaka, the son of the journalist Maruyama Kanji. As a high-school student in 1933 he was briefly detained by the police for attending a meeting of a left-wing study group. He studied law at Tokyo Imperial University and in 1937 became the assistant of the political philosopher Nanbara Shigeru; between 1940 and 1944 he wrote his essays on the political thought of the Tokugawa period. In 1944 he was drafted into the army and served in Korea and then in Hiroshima, where he experienced the atomic bombing on 6 August 1945. His essay “Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism”, published in May 1946, made him the leading intellectual of postwar democracy. He was professor at the University of Tokyo from 1950. In 1960 he took part in the protests against the renewal of the security treaty with the United States. During the student protests of 1968–69 his research office was occupied, and he left the university early in 1971. He then devoted himself to the history of Japanese thought and to studies of Fukuzawa Yukichi. He died in Tokyo on 15 August 1996.

Further main works

  • Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō, 1956–57)
  • Japanese Thought (Nihon no shisō, 1961)
  • Reading Fukuzawa’s Outline of a Theory of Civilization (1986)
  • Loyalty and Rebellion (Chūsei to hangyaku, 1992)

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made

Open in the star map