Maruyama Masao
Japonia czasu wojny była systemem, w którym wszyscy byli posłuszni, a nikt nie był odpowiedzialny; demokracja potrzebuje obywateli, którzy widzą porządek społeczny jako coś, co ludzie tworzą i mogą zmieniać.
Umiejscowienie
Politolog z Uniwersytetu Tokijskiego, którego esej „Teoria i psychologia ultranacjonalizmu” (1946) analizował państwo wojenne jako system, w którym nikt nie ponosił odpowiedzialności; w badaniach nad myślą epoki Tokugawa wywiódł początki nowoczesnego oddzielenia polityki od moralności od Ogyū Sorai i stał się czołowym głosem powojennej japońskiej myśli demokratycznej.
Kluczowe idee
- System nieodpowiedzialności
- Ogyū Sorai i oddzielenie polityki od moralności
- Natura a wynalazek (shizen i sakui) jako poglądy na porządek społeczny
- Demokracja jako permanentna rewolucja
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 4
Sorai Ogyū
pod wpływem
Maruyama argued that Ogyū Sorai’s view of the Way as made by the sages, separating politics from private morality, began modern political thought in Japan (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)
Źródło: szkic AI
Sorai Ogyū › 1666–1728
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
pod wpływem
Maruyama took Hegel’s picture of China as an unhistorical, stagnant empire as his starting question, aiming to show that Tokugawa Japan developed modern thought from within (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952), introduction; tr. M. Hane, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1974)
Źródło: szkic AI
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831
Max Weber
pod wpływem
Maruyama drew on Weber’s types of rule and his theory of rationalisation in his essays on Japanese politics (Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics, 1956–57). Maruyama Masao, Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō (1956–57), tr. I. Morris, Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (1963); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan (1996)
Źródło: szkic AI
Max Weber › 1864–1920
Karl Mannheim
pod wpływem
Maruyama used Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge (Ideology and Utopia) as a method for intellectual history, relating Tokugawa doctrines to the social positions that carried them (1952). Maruyama Masao, Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (1952); R. Kersten, Democracy in Postwar Japan: Maruyama Masao and the Search for Autonomy (1996)
Źródło: szkic AI
Karl Mannheim › 1893–1947
Dzieła
Esej opublikowany w czasopiśmie „Sekai” w maju 1946 roku, który uczynił go sławnym: państwo cesarskie rościło sobie władzę nad samymi wartościami, a ponieważ każdy czerpał władzę z bliskości cesarza, nikt nie ponosił odpowiedzialności.
Eseje napisane w latach 1940–44: rozpad ortodoksji Zhu Xi przez Ogyū Sorai, który widział porządek społeczny jako dzieło ludzi, i przez Narodową Naukę Motoori Norinagi.
Stanowisko
Maruyama’s essay on ultra-nationalism argued that the prewar Japanese state, unlike the modern European state, did not leave questions of value to the conscience of individuals but claimed to embody value itself in the emperor. Since everyone derived authority from their distance to the emperor, pressure from above was passed downwards – a “transfer of oppression” – and in the end no one regarded themselves as responsible; in a later essay he called this a “system of irresponsibility”. His studies of the Tokugawa period traced how Ogyū Sorai broke with the Zhu Xi orthodoxy: instead of seeing social order as part of nature (shizen), Sorai saw the Way as made by the sages (sakui), which opened the idea that order is a human construction and can be changed. Maruyama used Weber’s sociology and Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge, and he took Hegel’s picture of an unhistorical, stagnant China as a challenge to show that Japan had developed modern forms of thought from within. In “Japanese Thought” (1961) he described a culture of closed “octopus pots” in which ideas accumulate without being confronted. Later critics, including Yoshimoto Takaaki and postcolonial scholars, objected that he measured Japan against an idealised Europe; his defence of democracy as a “permanent revolution” remains a reference point.
Życie i kontekst
Maruyama Masao was born on 22 March 1914 in Osaka, the son of the journalist Maruyama Kanji. As a high-school student in 1933 he was briefly detained by the police for attending a meeting of a left-wing study group. He studied law at Tokyo Imperial University and in 1937 became the assistant of the political philosopher Nanbara Shigeru; between 1940 and 1944 he wrote his essays on the political thought of the Tokugawa period. In 1944 he was drafted into the army and served in Korea and then in Hiroshima, where he experienced the atomic bombing on 6 August 1945. His essay “Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism”, published in May 1946, made him the leading intellectual of postwar democracy. He was professor at the University of Tokyo from 1950. In 1960 he took part in the protests against the renewal of the security treaty with the United States. During the student protests of 1968–69 his research office was occupied, and he left the university early in 1971. He then devoted himself to the history of Japanese thought and to studies of Fukuzawa Yukichi. He died in Tokyo on 15 August 1996.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1952)
- Theory and Psychology of Ultra-Nationalism (1946)
- Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (Gendai seiji no shisō to kōdō, 1956–57)
- Japanese Thought (Nihon no shisō, 1961)
- Reading Fukuzawa’s Outline of a Theory of Civilization (1986)
- Loyalty and Rebellion (Chūsei to hangyaku, 1992)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora