Agora思想的公共广场

埃米尔·拉斯克

1875–1915

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

拉斯认为,哲学是关于有效性的科学,其核心问题是:经验中非理性的所予如何能在概念中被把握而又不被消解于概念之中。

定位

德国唯心主义及其后继者 · 东欧 · 认识论, 逻辑学

新康德主义者,曾师从文德尔班和李凯尔特,发展出一种哲学逻辑学:有效性有其自身的形式,问题在于非理性的所予如何能在概念中被把握;他早年对卢卡奇有过影响。

核心思想

  • 哲学作为有效性的科学
  • 非理性的实在与理性的概念之间的鸿沟

老师: 威廉·文德尔班, 海因里希·李凯尔特

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 威廉·文德尔班 师从

    师从

    Lask studied under Windelband in Heidelberg and later habilitated there. SEP “Neo-Kantianism” (J. Heis), §3

    依据: AI 草稿

    威廉·文德尔班 › 1848–1915

  • 海因里希·李凯尔特 师从

    师从

    Lask wrote his dissertation on Fichte under Rickert at Freiburg in 1902. SEP “Neo-Kantianism” (J. Heis), §3

    依据: AI 草稿

    海因里希·李凯尔特 › 1863–1936

影响了 2

  • 马克斯·韦伯

    影响了

    Weber met the neo-Kantian problem of bridging irrational reality and rational concept in the form Lask gave it, and his methodological writings turn largely on that problem. SEP “Max Weber” (S. H. Kim), §2.1 (Lask named with Windelband and Rickert as the Baden School through which Weber found his epistemological template)

    依据: AI 草稿

    马克斯·韦伯 › 1864–1920

  • 格奥尔格·卢卡奇

    影响了

    Lukács’s early philosophy of art in Heidelberg rests on a neo-Kantian framework in which Lask’s influence is especially strong. SEP “Georg Lukács” (T. Stahl, rev. 2023), §1 and §2.2, citing Kavoulakos 2014

    依据: AI 草稿

    格奥尔格·卢卡奇 › 1885–1971

批评

受批评于 1

  • 马丁·海德格尔

    受其批评

    Heidegger’s 1919 lecture course likewise made Lask’s version of the philosophy of value a target of phenomenological critique. SEP “Hermann Lotze” (D. Sullivan, rev. 2024), §5.3

    依据: AI 草稿

    马丁·海德格尔 › 1889–1976

作品

  • 拉斯1902年在弗莱堡师从李凯尔特写成的博士论文,论费希特的观念论及其与历史的关系;他的第一部重要著作,比哲学的逻辑学早九年。

  • 把哲学发展为关于有效性的科学:拉斯追问,感性的、非理性的内容如何能成为概念形式的质料而不被还原为概念,并把有效性与客观性称为形式的两种类型;西南德意志学派的主要著作之一。

立场

Lask is on the map as the most influential and philosophically sophisticated student of Windelband and Rickert, in the words of the SEP entry on neo-Kantianism. Like his teachers he held that philosophy is the science of validity, but he worried that the stress on the objectivity of the valid and on the split between the factual and the normative could harden into a two-world metaphysics. In The Logic of Philosophy and the Doctrine of Categories (1911) he turned this into a two-element view: the form of a sense is validity, the form of an object is objectivity, and sensory content can be matter for conceptual form without being reduced to it. The Doctrine of Judgment (1912) added a primary object between the content of a judgment and the object judged. The problem of the irrational given, which Lask posed in this form, was taken over by Max Weber, who names him with Windelband and Rickert as a source of his epistemology; it also shaped the young Georg Lukács. Heidegger’s lecture course of 1919 made Lask’s philosophy of value a target of phenomenological critique, and Lask criticised Rickert’s view that natural science and historical individualisation are equally legitimate.

生平与背景

Emil Lask was born in 1875. He studied with Wilhelm Windelband in Heidelberg and with Heinrich Rickert in Freiburg, under whom he wrote his dissertation Fichte’s Idealism and History (1902). He later habilitated at Heidelberg, where he became a professor. He died in 1915 in the First World War.

其他主要作品

  • Fichte’s Idealism and History (Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte, 1902)
  • The Logic of Philosophy and the Doctrine of Categories (Die Logik der Philosophie und die Kategorienlehre, 1911)
  • The Doctrine of Judgment (Die Lehre vom Urteil, 1912)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开