Ibn Tajmijja
Grecka logika nie dodaje nic do tego, co zdrowy ludzki rozum już wie, a właściwie rozumiany rozum nigdy nie przeczy objawieniu – więc miarą są Koran i przykład Proroka, a nie filozofowie.
Umiejscowienie
Hanbalicki uczony z Damaszku, zmarły w więzieniu w jego cytadeli: w „Obaleniu logików” dowodził, że arystotelesowska definicja i sylogizm nic nie dodają do wiedzy, i występował przeciw Awicennie, Ibn Arabiemu i teologom aszarytom w imię Pisma i zdrowego rozumu.
Kluczowe idee
- Obalenie logików
- Zdrowy rozum i autentyczne objawienie nigdy się nie sprzeciwiają
- Uniwersalia istnieją tylko w umyśle
- Krytyka Ibn Arabiego i aszarytów
Krytyka
Krytykuje 6
Arystoteles
krytykuje
Ibn Taymiyya attacked Aristotelian logic: definitions cannot capture essences, and the syllogism yields no knowledge not available otherwise (al-Radd ala al-mantiqiyyin). Ibn Taymiyya, al-Radd ʿalā al-manṭiqiyyīn; W. Hallaq, Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek Logicians, 1993
Źródło: szkic AI
Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.
Abu al-Hasan al-Aszari
krytykuje
Ibn Taymiyya criticised Asharite kalam for reinterpreting God’s revealed attributes and for resting faith on the proof from atoms and accidents (Dar taarud al-aql wa-l-naql). Ibn Taymiyya, Darʾ taʿāruḍ al-ʿaql wa-l-naql; J. Hoover, Ibn Taymiyya, 2019
Źródło: szkic AI
Abu al-Hasan al-Aszari › ok. 874–936
Awicenna
krytykuje
Ibn Taymiyya rejected Avicenna’s God as a Necessary Existent without attributes and the Avicennan logic on which the philosophers built (Dar taarud; al-Radd ala al-mantiqiyyin). Ibn Taymiyya, Darʾ taʿāruḍ al-ʿaql wa-l-naql; al-Radd ʿalā al-manṭiqiyyīn; J. Hoover, Ibn Taymiyya, 2019
Źródło: szkic AI
Awicenna › 980–1037
Ibn Hazm
krytykuje
Ibn Taymiyya wrote a critique of Ibn Hazm’s Ranks of Consensus, disputing many of the points on which Ibn Hazm had claimed that the scholars agreed. Ibn Taymiyya, Naqd Marātib al-ijmāʿ, printed with Ibn Ḥazm, Marātib al-ijmāʿ (Cairo 1938)
Źródło: szkic AI
Ibn Hazm › 994–1064
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi
krytykuje
Ibn Taymiyya wrote Dar taarud against al-Razi’s ‘universal rule’ that reason prevails when it conflicts with revelation, arguing that sound reason and revelation never conflict. Ibn Taymiyya, Darʾ taʿāruḍ al-ʿaql wa-l-naql I; Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Asās al-taqdīs; J. Hoover, Ibn Taymiyya, 2019
Źródło: szkic AI
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi › ok. 1150–1210
Ibn Arabi
krytykuje
Ibn Taymiyya condemned Ibn Arabi’s Fusus al-hikam for identifying the existence of creatures with God’s existence, a view he attacked as ‘unity of existence’ (wahdat al-wujud). Ibn Taymiyya, Majmūʿ al-fatāwā II; A. Knysh, Ibn ʿArabi in the Later Islamic Tradition, 1999
Źródło: szkic AI
Ibn Arabi › 1165–1240
Dzieła
Definicje nie potrafią uchwycić istot, uniwersalia istnieją tylko w umyśle, a sylogizm nie daje wiedzy, której nie dałoby się uzyskać bez niego.
Przeciw regule Fakhr ad-Dina ar-Raziego, że rozum musi przeważać tam, gdzie zdaje się przeczyć Pismu: dobrze rozumiany zdrowy rozum i autentyczne objawienie nigdy się nie sprzeciwiają.
Stanowisko
Ibn Taymiyya wrote as a jurist and theologian, but much of his work is a sustained argument with philosophy and kalam. In The Refutation of the Logicians, begun in Alexandria and completed in Damascus, he argued that Aristotelian logic is neither necessary nor sufficient for knowledge. Definitions cannot capture the essence of a thing, because the line between essential and accidental properties is drawn arbitrarily; we know things by acquaintance and by distinguishing them from others. Universals exist only in the mind, and outside it there are only particular things. A syllogism only makes explicit what its premises already contain, and its conclusions are no more certain than those of analogy. In his longest philosophical work, Averting the Conflict between Reason and Revelation, he rejected Fakhr al-Din al-Razi’s “universal rule” that where reason and scripture seem to conflict, reason must prevail and scripture be interpreted figuratively. Sound reason and authentic revelation, he argued, cannot conflict, and much of what passes for reason in philosophy and kalam is mistaken. On these grounds he criticised Avicenna’s God, from whom the world emanates by necessity; the Asharite view that God’s attributes are timeless and involve no acts in time; and Ibn Arabi’s doctrine of being, which in his view erased the distinction between creator and creation. Some recent scholars, among them Wael Hallaq, Yahya Michot, Jon Hoover and Carl Sharif El-Tobgui, read him as a serious critic of philosophy on rational grounds; others see him above all as a traditionalist. His later reception, from Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab in the eighteenth century to modern Salafi and militant groups, is contested.
Życie i kontekst
Taqi al-Din Ahmad ibn Taymiyya was born in 1263 in Harran in upper Mesopotamia into a family of Hanbali scholars. In 1269 the family fled the Mongols to Damascus, then ruled by the Mamluk sultans of Cairo, where his father taught. He succeeded his father as a teacher in 1284 and became known as a jurist and preacher involved in public affairs. He issued fatwas calling for war against the Ilkhanid Mongols, although they had converted to Islam, and took part in the resistance to their invasions of Syria between 1299 and 1303. His theological creeds brought him into conflict with Asharite scholars and with Sufi groups. He was imprisoned in Cairo in 1306–07 and again in 1308–09, then held under house arrest in Alexandria for eight months. Back in Damascus he was jailed for some months over his rulings on divorce oaths and, from 1326, for condemning journeys to the tombs of prophets and saints. He died in prison in the citadel of Damascus in September 1328. His pupils included the theologian Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the historian Ibn Kathir.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Exposing the Deception of the Jahmiyya (Bayan talbis al-Jahmiyya, 1306–07)
- The Refutation of the Logicians (al-Radd ʿala al-mantiqiyyin, begun 1309–10)
- Governance according to God’s Law (al-Siyasa al-sharʿiyya, c. 1310)
- Averting the Conflict between Reason and Revelation (Darʾ taʿarud al-ʿaql wa-l-naql, after 1313)
- The Way of the Prophet’s Sunna (Minhaj al-sunna, against Twelver Shiʿism)
- Collected Fatwas (Majmuʿ al-fatawa, 37 vols., printed 1961–67)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora