AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Jan Buridan

ok. 1300–1360

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Słowa i pojęcia odnoszą się do rzeczy jednostkowych, a nie do bytów uniwersalnych; a rzucone ciało porusza się dalej, bo otrzymało impetus, który zużywają dopiero opór i ciężkość.

Umiejscowienie

Filozofia średniowieczna i scholastyka · Europa Zachodnia · Logika, Nauka, Etyka

Mistrz sztuk w Paryżu, który nigdy nie przeszedł do teologii: nominalistyczny logik, którego podręcznik czytano w całej Europie i który lot rzuconego ciała tłumaczył wpojoną siłą (impetus), a nie otaczającym powietrzem.

Kluczowe idee

  • Nominalistyczna logika i semantyka (Summulae)
  • Impetus
  • Paradoksy samoodniesienia
  • Wola może odroczyć wybór („osioł Buridana” to późniejsza nazwa)

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 2

  • Arystoteles

    pod wpływem ✓

    As a Paris arts master Buridan expounded most of Aristotle’s works in question commentaries, revising him within his framework, as with impetus in place of air pushing projectiles. John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum VIII q. 12; SEP “John Buridan”

    Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata

    Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.

  • Jan Filopon

    pod wpływem sporne

    Buridan’s impetus resembles Philoponus’ impressed force; since Philoponus’ Physics commentary was not available in Latin, a direct link is disputed, perhaps via Arabic authors. John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum VIII q. 12; SEP “John Philoponus”; SEP “John Buridan”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Jan Filopon › ok. 490–570

Wpływ na 1

  • Galileusz

    wpływ na sporne

    Galileo’s early De motu (c. 1590) used an impressed force close to Buridan’s impetus; whether Paris impetus theory led to his mechanics, as Duhem claimed, is disputed. Galileo, De motu antiquiora (c. 1590); P. Duhem, Études sur Léonard de Vinci, vol. III (1913); SEP “John Buridan”; SEP “Galileo Galilei”

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Galileusz › 1564–1642

Krytyka

Krytykuje 1

  • William Ockham

    krytykuje

    Buridan shared Ockham’s nominalism but rejected his reduction of quantity to substance and quality, holding quantity to be a really distinct accident. John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum I; J. Zupko, John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth-Century Arts Master, 2003

    Źródło: szkic AI

    William Ockham › ok. 1287–1347

Dzieła

  • Zaczęte jako komentarz do podręcznika logiki Piotra Hiszpana i przepisane na własną nominalistyczną logikę, od terminów i supozycji po dowodzenie i sofizmaty.

  • Paryskie wykłady o „Fizyce” w ostatecznej redakcji: rzucone ciało porusza się dalej dzięki nadanemu mu impetusowi, który zużywają dopiero opór i ciężkość.

Stanowisko

Buridan’s logic is nominalist: only individual things exist, and general terms signify individuals by way of concepts in the mind. He set out this view in the Summulae de dialectica, a textbook that began as a commentary on Peter of Spain and became an independent work, and in treatises on consequences and on sophisms. He explained the truth of sentences through the theory of supposition – what terms stand for in a given sentence – and worked on paradoxes of self-reference such as “every proposition is false”. He could read Ockham’s Summa logicae but never names him, and on several points, such as the reality of quantity and Ockham’s account of motion, he argued against Ockhamist positions. In natural philosophy he is best known for the theory of impetus. A thrown body, he argued, does not move on because the air pushes it, as Aristotle had held, but because the thrower impresses on it an impetus, proportional to its speed and its quantity of matter, which would last indefinitely if the resistance of the air and the body’s gravity did not wear it down. He applied the idea to falling bodies and suggested that God might have given the heavenly spheres an impetus at creation, so that no angels were needed to move them. Similar ideas had been put forward by Philoponus and, in Arabic, by Avicenna; how they reached Paris is unclear. In his questions on the Nicomachean Ethics he argued that the will can defer its choice until the intellect has judged more fully. The ass starving between two equal bundles of hay does not occur in his works; it was probably attached to his name later, perhaps by critics. Albert of Saxony and Marsilius of Inghen carried his teaching to the new universities of Vienna and Heidelberg, and for two centuries his Summulae were read across Central Europe. Pierre Duhem saw him as a forerunner of Galileo; most historians now consider that an overstatement, since Buridan’s physics remained Aristotelian in its framework.

Życie i kontekst

John Buridan was born around 1300 in or near Béthune in Picardy and studied in Paris, where he was a master of arts by the mid-1320s. Unlike most leading masters he never took a degree in theology and never joined a religious order; he spent some three decades as a secular cleric teaching logic and natural philosophy in the arts faculty. A papal letter of 1329 calls him a cleric of the diocese of Arras and master of arts. He was rector of the university in 1328 and again in 1340. In his second term he signed the faculty’s statute of 29 December 1340 against reading authors too literally; whether it was aimed at followers of Ockham, as older historians thought, is disputed. He is last documented in 1358, and in 1361 one of his benefices was given to someone else, so he had probably died by then. The story that he was thrown into the Seine in a sack for an affair with a queen, which François Villon put into verse, is a legend.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • Treatise on Consequences (Tractatus de consequentiis)
  • Questions on Aristotle’s Physics (several redactions)
  • Questions on On the Heavens, On the Soul and the Metaphysics
  • Questions on the Nicomachean Ethics

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd