AgoraAn open square of thought

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

1712–1778

A first way ina deliberate simplification – the portrait says more

People are naturally good but society corrupts them, and a just state follows the general will – what the citizens will together for the common good, not the sum of their private wishes.

Placement

Empiricism, Enlightenment & Liberalism · Western Europe · Politics & Law, Society & History, Ethics

Man is good by nature, society corrupts him; popular sovereignty and the general will.

Key ideas

  • Volonté générale
  • State of nature
  • Education according to nature

Open in the star map

Influence

Influenced by 5

  • Plato

    influenced by

    In Emile (1762) Rousseau sent readers seeking an idea of public education to Plato’s Republic, ‘not a political work’ but ‘the finest treatise on education ever written’. J.-J. Rousseau, Émile ou De l’éducation (1762), Book I; SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Plato › 428–348 BCE

  • Niccolò Machiavelli

    influenced by

    In The Social Contract (1762) Rousseau read Machiavelli as a republican who, under the guise of instructing kings, gave peoples great lessons: The Prince is ‘the book of republicans’. J.-J. Rousseau, Du contrat social (1762), “De la monarchie”; SEP “Niccolò Machiavelli”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Niccolò Machiavelli › 1469–1527

  • John Locke

    influenced by

    Rousseau’s Emile (1762) builds on ‘the wise Locke’ and his Some Thoughts concerning Education (1693), while rejecting its maxim of reasoning with children. J.-J. Rousseau, Émile ou De l’éducation (1762); J. Locke, Some Thoughts concerning Education (1693); SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO

    John Locke › 1632–1704

  • Montesquieu

    influenced by

    Rousseau accepted as ‘established by Montesquieu’ the principle that liberty, not being a fruit of every climate, is not within every people’s reach (Social Contract, 1762). J.-J. Rousseau, Du contrat social (1762), Book III; Montesquieu, De l’esprit des lois (1748); SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO

    Montesquieu › 1689–1755

  • Denis Diderot

    influenced by

    Visiting the imprisoned Diderot at Vincennes in 1749, Rousseau was encouraged by him to answer the Dijon prize question (Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, 1750). J.-J. Rousseau, Les Confessions (1782–89); Discours sur les sciences et les arts (1750); SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO

    Denis Diderot › 1713–1784

Influenced 13

  • Immanuel Kant

    influenced ✓

    In his Remarks on the Observations (1764–65) Kant wrote that Rousseau had set him right: he learned to honour human beings, not only to prize knowledge. I. Kant, Bemerkungen in den “Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen” (1764–65); SEP “Kant’s Moral Philosophy”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Immanuel Kant › 1724–1804

  • Johann Gottlieb Fichte

    influenced ✓

    Fichte’s Lectures on the Scholar’s Vocation (1794) examined Rousseau’s claims about the arts and sciences, honouring him but turning his longing for the past into forward striving. J. G. Fichte, Einige Vorlesungen über die Bestimmung des Gelehrten (1794); SEP “Johann Gottlieb Fichte”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Johann Gottlieb Fichte › 1762–1814

  • Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

    influenced ✓

    Hegel credited Rousseau with making the will the principle of the state, though he faulted the general will as a common will of individuals (Philosophy of Right, 1820). G. W. F. Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1820), on the state; SEP “Hegel’s Social and Political Philosophy”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel › 1770–1831

  • Leo Tolstoy

    influenced ✓

    Tolstoy told Paul Boyer (1901) that Rousseau had been his master since he was fifteen; he wore a medallion with Rousseau’s portrait instead of a cross. P. Boyer, interview with Tolstoy (1901); SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Leo Tolstoy › 1828–1910

  • Émile Durkheim

    influenced

    In lectures on the Social Contract (printed 1918) Durkheim read Rousseau’s general will as anticipating his view of society as a moral reality above individuals. É. Durkheim, “Le Contrat social de Rousseau”, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 25 (1918), in Montesquieu et Rousseau, précurseurs de la sociologie (1953); SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Émile Durkheim › 1858–1917

  • John Rawls

    influenced

    Rawls placed justice as fairness in Rousseau’s contract tradition and read the general will as citizens’ shared reasoning about the common good (lectures, publ. 2007). J. Rawls, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. S. Freeman (2007); A Theory of Justice (1971); SEP “John Rawls”

    Evidence: AI draft

    John Rawls › 1921–2002

Show all (13)Show fewer
  • Johann Gottfried Herder

    influenced

    In his Journal of My Voyage in 1769 Herder sketched Rousseauian plans of education, and his Treatise on the Origin of Language (1772) argued with Rousseau’s Second Discourse. J. G. Herder, Journal meiner Reise im Jahr 1769 (publ. 1846); Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache (1772); SEP “Johann Gottfried von Herder”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Johann Gottfried Herder › 1744–1803

  • Olympe de Gouges

    influenced

    Gouges’ Declaration of the Rights of Woman (1791) ends with a ‘Form for a Social Contract between Man and Woman’ that, echoing Rousseau, recasts marriage as a contract. O. de Gouges, Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne (1791), postscript; J. W. Scott, Only Paradoxes to Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man (1996)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Olympe de Gouges › 1748–1793

  • Sophie de Grouchy

    influenced

    Evelyn Forget reads Grouchy’s Letters on Sympathy (1798) as seeing Smith through Rousseau, notably in tying the growth of sympathy to Rousseauian ideas of education. S. de Grouchy, Lettres sur la sympathie (1798); E. L. Forget, “Cultivating Sympathy: Sophie Condorcet’s Letters on Sympathy”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought (2001)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Sophie de Grouchy › 1764–1822

  • Rifa’a al-Tahtawi

    influenced

    Al-Tahtawi listed Rousseau’s Social Contract among the political works he read in Paris and judged it very valuable. R. al-Ṭahṭāwī, Takhlīṣ al-ibrīz (1834); Newman 2004; A. Hourani, Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age (1962)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Rifa’a al-Tahtawi › 1801–1873

  • Alexis de Tocqueville

    influenced

    Tocqueville named Rousseau, with Pascal and Montesquieu, as authors he ‘lived with’ a little each day (1836); P. A. Rahe finds all three present in Democracy in America. A. de Tocqueville, letter to L. de Kergorlay (Nov. 1836); P. A. Rahe, Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect (2009)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Alexis de Tocqueville › 1805–1859

  • Liang Qichao

    influenced

    Liang Qichao introduced Rousseau’s social contract and popular sovereignty in ‘On Rousseau’ (Lusuo xue’an, 1901), turning after 1903 to Bluntschli’s theory of the state. Liang Qichao, Lusuo xue’an (1901); Zhengzhixue dajia Bolunzhili zhi xueshuo (1903); H. Chang, Liang Ch’i-ch’ao and Intellectual Transition in China (1971)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Liang Qichao › 1873–1929

  • Claude Lévi-Strauss

    influenced

    In a lecture of 1962 Lévi-Strauss called Rousseau founder of the human sciences, making his identification with the other and all living beings anthropology’s principle. C. Lévi-Strauss, “Jean-Jacques Rousseau, fondateur des sciences de l’homme” (1962), in Anthropologie structurale deux (1973); Tristes tropiques (1955); SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Claude Lévi-Strauss › 1908–2009

Criticism

Criticized by 8

  • Edmund Burke

    criticised by

    Burke called Rousseau ‘the insane Socrates of the National Assembly’ and attacked his ‘philosophy of vanity’ (Letter to a Member of the National Assembly, 1791). E. Burke, A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly (1791)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Edmund Burke › 1729–1797

  • Mary Wollstonecraft influenced

    influenced

    Wollstonecraft shared Rousseau’s critique of rank and luxury and his call for an education strengthening body and mind, but extended it to girls (Rights of Woman, 1792). M. Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792); SEP “Mary Wollstonecraft”

    Evidence: AI draft

    criticised by

    Wollstonecraft attacked Rousseau’s Émile for training Sophie for dependence and pleasing men, insisting that women need the same rational education as men (Rights of Woman, 1792, ch. 5). M. Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), ch. 5; SEP “Mary Wollstonecraft”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Mary Wollstonecraft › 1759–1797

  • Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

    criticised by

    Proudhon found ‘no vestige’ of a real contract in Rousseau’s Social Contract, only a legitimation of government instead of free agreements (General Idea of the Revolution, 1851). P.-J. Proudhon, Idée générale de la Révolution au XIXe siècle (1851); H. Rosenblatt & P. Schweigert, “Rousseau and Proudhon”, in Thinking with Rousseau (2017)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Pierre-Joseph Proudhon › 1809–1865

  • Isaiah Berlin

    criticised by

    Berlin saw in Rousseau’s general will, which can ‘force’ a citizen ‘to be free’, a source of positive liberty turned into coercion (Freedom and Its Betrayal, 1952). I. Berlin, Freedom and Its Betrayal (BBC lectures 1952; publ. 2002); J.-J. Rousseau, Du contrat social (1762), I.7

    Evidence: AI draft

    Isaiah Berlin › 1909–1997

  • Jacques Derrida

    criticised by

    In Of Grammatology (1967) Derrida argued that Rousseau condemns writing as a dangerous supplement to speech and nature, while his texts depend on the supplement throughout. J. Derrida, De la grammatologie (1967), part II, chs. 2–4; J.-J. Rousseau, Essai sur l’origine des langues; Confessions III

    Evidence: AI draft

    Jacques Derrida › 1930–2004

  • Carole Pateman influenced

    influenced

    Pateman made Rousseau the central theorist of participatory democracy, in which citizens learn self-government by taking part in it (Participation and Democratic Theory, 1970). C. Pateman, Participation and Democratic Theory (1970); J.-J. Rousseau, Du contrat social (1762)

    Evidence: AI draft

    criticised by

    Pateman argued that Rousseau’s social contract rests on a prior ‘sexual contract’ that subordinates women and keeps them out of the civil order (The Sexual Contract, 1988). C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988); “The Disorder of Women: Women, Love, and the Sense of Justice”, Ethics 91 (1980)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Carole Pateman › b. 1940

Show all (8)Show fewer
  • Catharine Macaulay

    criticised by

    In Letters on Education (1790) Macaulay rejected Rousseau’s separate education for girls, holding that virtue and reason have no sex and that both sexes should be taught alike. C. Macaulay, Letters on Education (1790), Part I; SEP “Catharine Macaulay”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Catharine Macaulay › 1731–1791

  • Charles W. Mills

    criticised by

    Mills argued that Rousseau’s ‘savages’ are always non-Europeans, and that his account of Europe’s lead through metallurgy and agriculture is historically inaccurate (The Racial Contract, 1997). C. W. Mills, The Racial Contract (1997); J.-J. Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité (1755), part II

    Evidence: AI draft

    Charles W. Mills › 1951–2021

Criticizes 4

  • Hugo Grotius

    criticised

    Rousseau objected that Grotius establishes right by fact, deriving a right to enslave captives and subject peoples from what actually happens (Social Contract, 1762, I.2, I.4). J.-J. Rousseau, Du contrat social (1762), I.2, I.4

    Evidence: AI draft

    Hugo Grotius › 1583–1645

  • Thomas Hobbes influenced by

    influenced by

    In The Social Contract (1762) Rousseau praised Hobbes as the only Christian author who dared to reunite the ‘two heads of the eagle’, state and church. J.-J. Rousseau, Du contrat social (1762), “De la religion civile”; SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: also in InPhO · InPhO

    criticised

    Rousseau objected that Hobbes gave natural man the passions of social man and overlooked natural pity (Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, 1755, Part I). J.-J. Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité (1755), Part I; SEP “Jean Jacques Rousseau”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Thomas Hobbes › 1588–1679

  • Bernard Mandeville

    criticised

    Rousseau granted Mandeville that pity is natural but objected that he missed that generosity, clemency and humanity all flow from it (Second Discourse, 1755). J.-J. Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine de l’inégalité (1755), Part I

    Evidence: AI draft

    Bernard Mandeville › 1670–1733

  • Voltaire

    criticised

    Rousseau answered Voltaire’s Lisbon poem by defending Providence: the city’s people, not nature, had crowded twenty thousand tall houses together (Letter to Voltaire, 18 August 1756). J.-J. Rousseau, Lettre à Voltaire sur la Providence, 18 Aug. 1756; Voltaire, Poème sur le désastre de Lisbonne (1756)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Voltaire › 1694–1778

Works

  • The first man who enclosed a piece of ground was the true founder of civil society.

  • A natural education – for Emile; Sophie, by contrast, is raised to be his companion.

  • Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains – popular sovereignty.

  • Twelve books on his life up to 1765, written 1765–1770 and published after his death (1782 and 1789): he means to show a man “in all the truth of nature” – including the ribbon he stole and blamed on a young servant, and the five children he left at the foundling hospital.

Position

Rousseau argued that human beings are naturally good, free and self-sufficient, and that it is society – property, competition and the craving for recognition – that makes them unequal and corrupt. But there is no way back to nature. The Social Contract instead seeks a political order in which each, by uniting with all, “obeys only himself”: legitimate laws express the general will of the people, which is sovereign. In Emile he sketched an education that follows the child’s natural development – though its fifth book subordinates the girl Sophie’s education to Emile’s needs, the target of Mary Wollstonecraft’s critique. Rousseau’s ideas inspired the French Revolution, Kant’s concept of autonomy and Romanticism, and his critique of civilisation still resonates today.

Life & context

Born in Geneva in 1712, Rousseau lost his mother at birth, left home as a teenager and taught himself through years of wandering. In Paris he befriended Diderot and won fame with a prize essay in 1750; the five children he had with Thérèse Levasseur he gave to a foundling hospital. When Emile and The Social Contract were condemned in 1762 he had to flee; a stay in England with Hume ended in a quarrel. He died in 1778 at Ermenonville.

Further main works

  • Discourse on the Sciences and Arts (1750)
  • Julie, or the New Heloise (1761)
  • Reveries of the Solitary Walker (written 1776–1778, published 1782)

Appears in

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made

Open in the star map