AgoraAn open square of thought

Catharine Macaulay

1731–1791

A first way ina deliberate simplification – the portrait says more

Macaulay held that moral truths are eternal and knowable by reason, so political rights rest on universal principles, not on custom or inherited institutions; the people may resist misrule, and since differences of character between the sexes come from education, girls and boys should be educated alike.

Placement

Empiricism, Enlightenment & Liberalism · Northern Europe · Politics & Law, Ethics, Society & History, Gender & Feminism

English republican historian and political writer: her “History of England” (1763–83) answered Hume from a radical Whig standpoint; against Hobbes and Burke she argued that rights rest on universal moral principles, and in “Letters on Education” (1790) that differences of character between the sexes come from education.

Key ideas

  • Rights rest on immutable moral truth
  • Republican history against Hume
  • Equal education for girls and boys
  • No characteristic difference in sex

Open in the star map

Influence

Influenced 1

  • Mary Wollstonecraft

    influenced

    Wollstonecraft reviewed Macaulay’s Letters on Education (1790) and in the Rights of Woman (1792) took up her argument that both sexes should receive the same education. M. Wollstonecraft, review in the Analytical Review (Nov. 1790); A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792); C. Macaulay, Letters on Education (1790); SEP “Mary Wollstonecraft”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Mary Wollstonecraft › 1759–1797

Criticism

Criticizes 4

  • Thomas Hobbes

    criticised

    Macaulay’s Loose Remarks on Hobbes’s Philosophical Rudiments of Government (1767) rejected his case for absolute sovereignty and appended a sketch of a democratic constitution. C. Macaulay, Loose Remarks on Certain Positions to be Found in Mr. Hobbes’s Philosophical Rudiments of Government and Society (1767); SEP “Catharine Macaulay”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Thomas Hobbes › 1588–1679

  • David Hume

    criticised

    Macaulay’s History of England (1763–1783) set a republican account of the Stuart era against Hume’s History, which in Macaulay’s view excused arbitrary royal power. C. Macaulay, The History of England from the Accession of James I to that of the Brunswick Line (8 vols., 1763–1783); SEP “Catharine Macaulay”

    Evidence: AI draft

    David Hume › 1711–1776

  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    criticised

    In Letters on Education (1790) Macaulay rejected Rousseau’s separate education for girls, holding that virtue and reason have no sex and that both sexes should be taught alike. C. Macaulay, Letters on Education (1790), Part I; SEP “Catharine Macaulay”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau › 1712–1778

  • Edmund Burke

    criticised

    Macaulay answered Burke’s Reflections (1790), defending the people’s right to change their government and rejecting his appeal to inherited constitution and prejudice (Observations on the Reflections, 1790). C. Macaulay, Observations on the Reflections of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke, on the Revolution in France (1790); SEP “Catharine Macaulay”

    Evidence: AI draft

    Edmund Burke › 1729–1797

Works

Position

Macaulay is on the map as a republican political thinker and an early theorist of women’s education. Her “History of England” from James I to the Revolution of 1688 was read as a counterpart to Hume’s: where Hume, a sceptic about the grounds of morality, was taken to be sympathetic to the Stuarts, she defended the parliamentarians of the Civil War and held that moral truths are eternal and knowable by reason. After she sent him her first volume in 1764, they argued by letter over whether a division of power established by custom is legitimate. In “Loose Remarks” (1767) she rejected Hobbes’s purely political account of the state, his contract theory and his view of parental duties, and appended a democratic constitution for Corsica. Against Burke she argued in 1770 that political corruption had its roots in aristocratic factions, and in 1790 that rights resting on inherited custom are fragile and must rest on universal principles, together with equal representation of the whole people. Her “Treatise on the Immutability of Moral Truth” (1783) joined a rationalist ethics to a doctrine of moral necessity. The “Letters on Education” (1790) argued that differences of character between the sexes are produced by education, criticised Rousseau’s education of Sophie and proposed that girls and boys be taught together. Mary Wollstonecraft reviewed the book and in “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” (1792) called her the woman of the greatest abilities that England had produced.

Life & context

Catharine Sawbridge was born on 2 April 1731 at Olantigh near Wye in Kent into a wealthy landed family and educated at home, largely through her own reading of Roman and English history. In 1760 she married the Scottish physician George Macaulay, who died in 1766. The first volume of her “History of England” appeared in 1763, the eighth and last in 1783. Her London house became a meeting place of radical Whigs; her brother John Sawbridge was a leading radical in the City of London and its Lord Mayor in 1775. Her marriage in 1778 to William Graham, who was 21, brought public ridicule and cost her many supporters. In 1784–85 she travelled in the United States and stayed with George Washington at Mount Vernon. In 1790 she published the “Letters on Education” and her reply to Burke’s “Reflections”. She died at Binfield in Berkshire on 22 June 1791.

Further main works

  • Loose Remarks on Certain Positions to be Found in Mr. Hobbes’s Philosophical Rudiments of Government and Society (1767)
  • Observations on a Pamphlet, Entitled, Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents (1770)
  • A Treatise on the Immutability of Moral Truth (1783)

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made

Open in the star map