हर्बर्ट ब्लूमर
ब्लूमर का मत था कि लोग चीज़ों के प्रति उन अर्थों के आधार पर कर्म करते हैं जो उनके लिए उनके हैं, कि ऐसे अर्थ सामाजिक अंतःक्रिया में उठते हैं और व्याख्या से सँभाले जाते हैं; समाज संयुक्त कर्म है, और समाजशास्त्र को चरों का सहसंबंध खोजने के बजाय उसका सीधा अध्ययन करना चाहिए।
पृष्ठभूमि
शिकागो और बर्कली के अमेरिकी समाजशास्त्री जिन्होंने मीड के सामाजिक मनोविज्ञान को “प्रतीकात्मक अंतःक्रियावाद” के कार्यक्रम में बदला, एक नाम जो उन्होंने 1937 में गढ़ा: लोग चीज़ों के प्रति उन अर्थों के आधार पर कर्म करते हैं जो वे उनके लिए रखती हैं, और अर्थ अंतःक्रिया में उठते हैं; चर-विश्लेषण और महा-सिद्धांत के विरुद्ध उन्होंने अनुभवजन्य सामाजिक जगत के निकट अध्ययन का आह्वान किया।
मुख्य विचार
- अर्थ अंतःक्रिया में उठता है
- संयुक्त कर्म के रूप में समाज
- संवेदनशील अवधारणाएँ
- चर-विश्लेषण के विरुद्ध
गुरु: जॉर्ज हर्बर्ट मीड
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 1
जॉर्ज हर्बर्ट मीड जिनसे पढ़ा
जिनसे पढ़ा
Blumer studied with Mead at Chicago (PhD 1928) and took over his course in social psychology in 1931, when Mead fell ill; he coined the term ‘symbolic interactionism’ (1937) for the approach he drew from Mead. H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism (1969), ch. 1
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
जॉर्ज हर्बर्ट मीड › 1863–1931
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया 1
इरविंग गोफमैन
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
Goffman studied at Chicago while Blumer taught there and came to Berkeley at his invitation (1958); he shared Blumer’s focus on interaction but declined the label symbolic interactionist. H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism (1969); T. Burns, Erving Goffman (1992); J. Verhoeven, “An Interview with Erving Goffman, 1980”, Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1993)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
इरविंग गोफमैन › 1922–1982
आलोचना
जिनकी आलोचना की 2
फ़्लोरियन ज़नानिएत्स्की
जिनकी आलोचना की
Blumer’s appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish Peasant (1939) found that its personal documents illustrate but do not test its theory of attitudes and values. H. Blumer, An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish Peasant in Europe and America (Social Science Research Council, 1939)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
फ़्लोरियन ज़नानिएत्स्की › 1882–1958
टैल्कॉट पार्सन्स
जिनकी आलोचना की
Blumer objected that Parsons and the functionalists treat actors as passive media of social forces, neglecting how people interpret their situations (Symbolic Interactionism, 1969). H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (1969), ch. 1; N. J. Smelser, “Remembering Herbert Blumer”
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
टैल्कॉट पार्सन्स › 1902–1979
कृतियाँ
सामाजिक विज्ञान अनुसंधान परिषद द्वारा आयोजित अमेरिकी समाजशास्त्र के सबसे सराहे गए अध्ययन की आलोचना: उसकी रुख़ और मूल्य की अवधारणाएँ स्पष्ट रूप से अलग नहीं रखी गईं, और पत्र तथा जीवन-कथाएँ उसके सिद्धांत को परखते नहीं, उदाहरण देते हैं।
“प्रतीकात्मक अंतःक्रियावाद की पद्धतिगत स्थिति” से आरंभ होते निबंध: लोग चीज़ों के प्रति उन अर्थों के आधार पर कर्म करते हैं जो वे उनके लिए रखती हैं, अर्थ सामाजिक अंतःक्रिया में उठते हैं और व्याख्या से संभाले जाते हैं; शोध को अन्वेषण और निरीक्षण द्वारा सीधे अनुभवजन्य जगत तक जाना चाहिए।
मत
Blumer is on the map because he gave the sociological reading of Mead’s social psychology a name and a programme. In an essay of 1937 he coined the term “symbolic interactionism”; the essays collected in “Symbolic Interactionism” (1969) set out three premises: human beings act towards things on the basis of the meanings these things have for them; these meanings arise out of social interaction; and they are handled and modified through an interpretive process. Society, on this view, consists of people fitting their lines of action together in “joint action”, and institutions are not forces acting on people but continuing patterns of such action. From this followed a method: sociology should go directly to the empirical world by “exploration” and “inspection”, and its concepts should be “sensitising” rather than definitive (“What Is Wrong with Social Theory?”, 1954). He criticised the reduction of research to relations between variables (presidential address, 1956), the relation between theory and documents in Thomas and Znaniecki’s “The Polish Peasant” (1939) and theories that derive action from norms and systems, as in his exchange with Talcott Parsons (1975). His essay “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position” (1958) explained prejudice by the position that groups claim in relation to one another. Commentators note that he narrowed Mead’s approach to the level of interaction; C. McPhail and C. Rexroat (1979) argued that his methodology diverges from Mead’s social behaviourism, and Blumer replied in 1980 that the two converge.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Herbert Blumer was born on 7 March 1900 in St. Louis, Missouri. He studied at the University of Missouri (BA 1921, MA 1922) and then at the University of Chicago, where he took his doctorate in 1928 with a dissertation on “Method in Social Psychology” supervised by Ellsworth Faris. In Chicago he heard George Herbert Mead and, after Mead’s death in 1931, took over his course in social psychology. From 1925 to 1933 he also played professional American football for the Chicago Cardinals. He taught at Chicago from 1927 to 1952, was secretary-treasurer of the American Sociological Society and edited the American Journal of Sociology (1941–52). In 1952 he went to the University of California, Berkeley, as the first chair of its department of sociology, to which he brought Erving Goffman in 1958; he retired in 1967. In 1956 he was president of the American Sociological Society. He died on 13 April 1987 in Danville, California.
अन्य प्रमुख कृतियाँ
- Movies and Conduct (1933)
- Social Psychology (essay in E. P. Schmidt, ed., Man and Society, 1937)
- An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish Peasant in Europe and America (1939)
- What Is Wrong with Social Theory? (1954)
- Sociological Analysis and the “Variable” (1956)
- Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position (1958)
- Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (1969)
- Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change (posthumous, 1990)
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है