Agoraساحة مفتوحة للفكر

ألخيرداس جوليان غريماس

1917–1992

مدخل أولتبسيط مقصود – واللمحة تقول أكثر

ينشأ المعنى من الاختلافات: ففي أساس كل حكاية أدوار قليلة – الذات والموضوع، والمرسِل والمرسَل إليه، والمساعد والمعارض – ومجموعة صغيرة من العلاقات المنطقية يستطيع علم السيميائيات أن يُظهرها.

التموضع

البنيوية وما بعد البنيوية · أوروبا الشرقية · اللغة

عالم سيميائيات ليتواني وُلد في تولا عام 1917 وعمل في فرنسا وطوّر دلالة بنيوية ونحوًا للسرد: «النموذج العاملي» (الفاعل والموضوع والمساعد والمعارض …) والمربع السيميائي للتقابلات.

الأفكار الرئيسة

  • النموذج العاملي
  • المربع السيميائي
  • الدلالة البنيوية
  • مدرسة باريس السيميائية

افتح في خريطة النجوم

التأثير

تأثّر بـ 2

  • فردينان دو سوسور

    تأثّر بـ

    Greimas extended Saussure’s principle that meaning arises from differences, via Hjelmslev, to semantics, breaking meaning down into semes and isotopies (Sémantique structurale, 1966). A. J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale (1966); F. de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (1916)

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    فردينان دو سوسور › 1857–1913

  • كلود ليفي ستروس

    تأثّر بـ

    Greimas drew on Lévi-Strauss’s analysis of myth for his actantial model (Sémantique structurale, 1966) and reworked his Bororo reference myth in an essay on mythic narrative (1966). A. J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale (1966); “Éléments pour une théorie de l’interprétation du récit mythique”, Communications 8 (1966); C. Lévi-Strauss, Le cru et le cuit (1964)

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    كلود ليفي ستروس › 1908–2009

النقد

انتقده 1

  • بول ريكور

    انتقده

    Ricœur argued that Greimas’s semiotic model of narrative presupposes, rather than replaces, the temporal understanding of plot from which it is derived (Temps et récit II, 1984). P. Ricœur, Temps et récit II (1984), ch. 2; “La grammaire narrative de Greimas” (1980)

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    بول ريكور › 1913–2005

الأعمال

الموقف

Greimas transferred structural linguistics to the analysis of meaning. In “Structural Semantics” (1966), starting from Saussure and Louis Hjelmslev, he broke meaning down into minimal features (semes) and identified recurrent “isotopies” that make a text readable as coherent. From Vladimir Propp’s analysis of the Russian folktale, Étienne Souriau’s dramatic situations and Lévi-Strauss’s analysis of myth he derived the actantial model: six roles – subject and object, sender and receiver, helper and opponent – that underlie narratives. In “The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints” (with François Rastier, 1968), reprinted in “On Meaning” (1970), he developed the semiotic square, which relates a term to its contrary, its contradictory and the implications between them. Later work with Joseph Courtés (an analytical dictionary of semiotics, 1979) and Jacques Fontanille (“The Semiotics of Passions”, 1991) extended the model to modalities and emotions. The Paris School shaped literary studies, the analysis of media and advertising, and biblical exegesis in France, Italy and Latin America. Paul Ricœur examined Greimas’s narrative grammar closely in “Time and Narrative II” (1984) and argued that its logical model depends on a prior, temporal understanding of action that it cannot account for itself; other critics faulted its formalism and the abstraction of its terminology.

الحياة والسياق

Algirdas Julien Greimas was born on 9 March 1917 in Tula, Russia, to Lithuanian parents, who returned to independent Lithuania after the First World War. He studied law in Kaunas and from 1936 to 1939 French linguistics in Grenoble. Back in Lithuania he did military service and during the war taught at a secondary school in Marijampolė. In 1944 he left for France, where in 1949 he took his doctorate at the Sorbonne with a thesis on the vocabulary of fashion around 1830. He then taught French in Alexandria (1949–58), where he met Roland Barthes, afterwards in Ankara and Istanbul, and from 1962 at the University of Poitiers. In 1965 he became director of studies at the École pratique des hautes études in Paris; until his retirement in 1985 his seminar formed the core of the “Paris School” of semiotics. He was among the founders of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (1969). Alongside his theoretical work he wrote studies of Lithuanian mythology, published in Lithuanian and French, and essays for the Lithuanian émigré press. He died in Paris on 27 February 1992.

أعمال رئيسة أخرى

  • Maupassant: The Semiotics of Text (Maupassant. La sémiotique du texte, 1976)
  • Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary (with J. Courtés, Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage, 1979)
  • Of Gods and Men: Studies in Lithuanian Mythology (Des dieux et des hommes, 1985)
  • The Semiotics of Passions (with J. Fontanille, Sémiotique des passions, 1991)

المصادر: Wikipedia · Wikidata

بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora

افتح في خريطة النجوم