Agoraساحة مفتوحة للفكر

كورنيليوس كاستورياديس

1922–1997

مدخل أولتبسيط مقصود – واللمحة تقول أكثر

لا تحكم المجتمعات قوانين التاريخ ولا الطبيعة بل تخلق نفسها عبر دلالات متخيَّلة؛ والاستقلال الذاتي (autonomy) أن يعترف المجتمع وأعضاؤه بأنفسهم مؤلفين لمؤسساتهم وأن يجرؤوا على مساءلتها.

التموضع

الاشتراكية والفوضوية والماركسية والنظرية النقدية · غرب آسيا وشمال أفريقيا · السياسة والقانون, المجتمع والتاريخ, العقل والوعي

فيلسوف واقتصادي ومحلل نفسي وُلد في القسطنطينية ونشأ في أثينا شارك في تأسيس جماعة «الاشتراكية أو البربرية» في باريس عام 1949، وقطع مع الماركسية، وجعل «المتخيَّل الاجتماعي» الخلّاق ومشروع الاستقلال الذاتي الفردي والجماعي في مركز عمله.

الأفكار الرئيسة

  • التأسيس التخيّلي للمجتمع
  • الاستقلال الذاتي والتبعية
  • الخيال الجذري
  • نقد المجتمع البيروقراطي

افتح في خريطة النجوم

التأثير

تأثّر بـ 1

  • سيغموند فرويد

    تأثّر بـ

    Castoriadis read Freud’s psyche as radical imagination, a ceaseless flow of representations that society must socialise (The Imaginary Institution of Society, 1975). C. Castoriadis, L’institution imaginaire de la société (1975)

    التوثيق: مسجّل أيضًا في InPhO · InPhO

    سيغموند فرويد › 1856–1939

أثّر في 1

  • جان فرانسوا ليوتار

    أثّر في

    As a member of Socialisme ou Barbarie (1954–64) Lyotard adopted Castoriadis’s critique of bureaucracy, Soviet and capitalist, before splitting with him in 1963 over his revision of Marxism. J.-F. Lyotard, La guerre des Algériens. Écrits 1956–1963 (1989); Pérégrinations (1988); SEP “Jean François Lyotard”

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    جان فرانسوا ليوتار › 1924–1998

النقد

انتقده 1

  • يورغن هابرماس

    انتقده

    Habermas objected that Castoriadis’s creative social imaginary transfers the philosophy of the subject to society and cannot ground rational autonomy (Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, 1985). J. Habermas, Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne (1985), excursus on Castoriadis (after Lecture XI)

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    يورغن هابرماس › 1929–2026

ينتقد 2

  • كارل ماركس

    انتقد

    Castoriadis concluded that Marx’s economic determinism and primacy of productive forces cannot grasp social creation, so the theory had become an ideology (Imaginary Institution of Society, 1975, I). C. Castoriadis, “Marxisme et théorie révolutionnaire”, Socialisme ou Barbarie 36–40 (1964–65); L’institution imaginaire de la société (1975), part I

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    كارل ماركس › 1818–1883

  • جاك لاكان

    انتقد

    Castoriadis rejected Lacan’s view of the imaginary as specular illusion, conceiving it as radical creation, and attacked Lacanian practice (Imaginary Institution, 1975; ‘La psychanalyse, projet et élucidation’, 1977). C. Castoriadis, L’institution imaginaire de la société (1975); “La psychanalyse, projet et élucidation”, in Les carrefours du labyrinthe I (1978), pp. 81–157

    التوثيق: مسودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي

    جاك لاكان › 1901–1981

الأعمال

الموقف

Castoriadis is on the map for the idea that societies create themselves. In “Socialisme ou Barbarie” he analysed the Soviet Union as bureaucratic capitalism and saw the division between those who direct and those who carry out orders as the central conflict of modern societies in East and West; his ideas on workers’ self-management found an echo in May 1968. In the 1960s he concluded that Marxism, with its determinism and its claim to know the laws of history, had itself become an obstacle. “The Imaginary Institution of Society” sets against it the social imaginary: every society institutes itself through significations, gods, values, ideas of what is real, that cannot be deduced from nature or reason. Autonomy means that a society, and an individual, recognises itself as the author of its institutions and can question them; he found historical models in the Athenian polis and in modern democratic and workers’ movements. From Freud he took the radical imagination of the psyche, while rejecting Lacan’s structuralism. Jean-François Lyotard belonged to Socialisme ou Barbarie for ten years. Jürgen Habermas objected in 1985 that in Castoriadis’s model the creation of new worlds of meaning cannot be tied back to reasons the members of a society can share, and Axel Honneth discussed his ontology of creation critically in the same decade.

الحياة والسياق

Cornelius Castoriadis was born on 11 March 1922 in Constantinople; his family moved to Athens the same year. He studied law, economics and political science in Athens, joined the communist youth in 1937 under the Metaxas dictatorship and during the German occupation broke with the Communist Party to join a Trotskyist group, which exposed him to persecution from both sides. In December 1945 he left for Paris on a French scholarship aboard the ship “Mataroa”. In the French Trotskyist party he formed a tendency with Claude Lefort and left the party with it in 1948; the group and journal “Socialisme ou Barbarie” (journal 1949–65) emerged from it, and he wrote there under pseudonyms such as Pierre Chaulieu and Paul Cardan. From 1948 to 1970 he worked as an economist at the OEEC, later the OECD. Only after becoming a French citizen in 1970 did he publish under his own name. In 1969 he followed the break with Lacan’s school that led to the founding of the Quatrième Groupe, trained as a psychoanalyst and practised from 1973. From 1980 he was director of studies at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales in Paris. He died in Paris on 26 December 1997.

أعمال رئيسة أخرى

  • Bureaucratic Society (La société bureaucratique, 2 vols., 1973)
  • The Content of Socialism (Le contenu du socialisme, 1979)
  • The Rising Tide of Insignificancy (La montée de l’insignifiance, 1996)

المصادر: Wikipedia · Wikidata

بحسب الوضع في نوفمبر 2026 · المصادر · حسّن هذه الصفحة · كيف صُنع Agora

افتح في خريطة النجوم