Agora思想的公共广场

尼古拉·车尔尼雪夫斯基

1828–1889

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

人是统一的自然存在;每个人都出于自身利益而行动,而正确理解自身利益的人,将建立一个合作劳动、男女平等的社会。

定位

社会主义、无政府主义、马克思主义与批判理论 · 东欧 · 社会与历史, 政治与法, 伦理学

俄国批评家与哲学家,他把费尔巴哈的唯物主义、合理利己主义和对农村公社的期望结合起来;他于1862—1863年在狱中写成的小说《怎么办?》成为几代俄国革命者的手册。

核心思想

  • 人本学唯物主义
  • 合理利己主义
  • 农村公社作为通向社会主义的道路
  • 《怎么办?》

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 1

  • 路德维希·费尔巴哈

    受其影响

    In The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy (1860) Chernyshevsky followed Feuerbach in treating the human being as a single natural organism, against any dualism of body and soul. N. Chernyshevsky, Antropologičeskij princip v filosofii (1860); A. Walicki, A History of Russian Thought (1979)

    依据: AI 草稿

    路德维希·费尔巴哈 › 1804–1872

影响了 2

  • 卡尔·马克思

    影响了

    Marx praised Chernyshevsky’s critique of Mill (Capital, afterword 1873) and discussed his question whether Russia could reach socialism through the peasant commune (letter of 1877). K. Marx, Das Kapital I, afterword to the 2nd ed. (1873); letter to the editors of Otechestvennye Zapiski (1877, unsent); T. Shanin, Late Marx and the Russian Road (1983)

    依据: AI 草稿

    卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883

  • 格奥尔基·普列汉诺夫

    影响了

    In his studies of Chernyshevsky (from 1890) Plekhanov claimed him as a forerunner of Russian Marxism whose view of history nonetheless remained idealist. G. Plekhanov, N. G. Chernyshevsky (1890; book 1910); S. H. Baron, Plekhanov: The Father of Russian Marxism (1963)

    依据: AI 草稿

    格奥尔基·普列汉诺夫 › 1856–1918

批评

受批评于 1

  • 费奥多尔·陀思妥耶夫斯基

    受其批评

    Dostoevsky’s underground man (Notes from Underground, 1864) mocks the rational egoism and ‘crystal palace’ of Chernyshevsky’s What Is to Be Done?, valuing free will above advantage. F. Dostoevsky, Zapiski iz podpol’ya (1864), Part I, chs. 7–10; N. Chernyshevsky, Chto delat’? (1863); J. Frank, Dostoevsky: The Stir of Liberation, 1860–1865 (1986)

    依据: AI 草稿

    费奥多尔·陀思妥耶夫斯基 › 1821–1881

作品

  • 继费尔巴哈之后的唯物主义纲领:人是统一的自然存在,伦理应当建立在开明的自身利益之上。

  • 一部在狱中写成的小说,讲述依照合理利己主义、合作劳动与男女平等而生活的“新人”;它成为俄国革命者的榜样。

立场

Chernyshevsky is on the map as the main theorist of the Russian radicals of the 1860s. In “The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy” (1860) he followed Feuerbach: the human being is a single natural organism, and morality is explained by self-interest, which, rightly understood, coincides with the interest of society. His economic writings defended the peasant commune, which he thought might allow Russia to pass to socialism without going through the full development of capitalism – a question that Marx, who learned Russian partly to read him and praised him in the afterword to “Capital” (1873), later took up in his writings on the Russian commune. “What Is to Be Done?” turned these ideas into a model of life for the “new people” and inspired many revolutionaries; Lenin named his pamphlet of 1902 after it. Plekhanov wrote a monograph on him and saw him as a forerunner of Russian Marxism. Objections came early: the Kyiv philosopher Pamfil Yurkevych criticised his materialism, Dostoevsky’s “Notes from Underground” (1864) rejected the “Crystal Palace” of a rationally calculated happiness, and Vladimir Nabokov later satirised his life in the novel “The Gift”.

生平与背景

Nikolai Chernyshevsky was born on 24 July 1828 in Saratov, the son of a priest, and attended the seminary there before studying history and philology at St Petersburg University from 1846 to 1850. After teaching at the Saratov gymnasium he returned to the capital in 1853 and joined the journal “The Contemporary” (Sovremennik), edited by the poet Nikolai Nekrasov, where he and Nikolai Dobrolyubov became the leading voices of the radical intelligentsia. His master’s thesis on the aesthetic relations of art to reality (1855) declared that the beautiful is life. In the debates on the emancipation of the serfs (1861) he defended the peasant commune and criticised the terms of the reform. In July 1862 he was arrested and held in the Peter and Paul Fortress, where he wrote “What Is to Be Done?”; the novel passed the censors and appeared in Sovremennik in 1863. On evidence that was partly fabricated he was sentenced in 1864 to hard labour and lifelong exile in Siberia, after a mock public execution in St Petersburg. He spent almost twenty years in Siberia, much of it in Vilyuysk in Yakutia, was allowed to settle in Astrakhan in 1883 and in Saratov in 1889, where he died on 29 October 1889.

其他主要作品

  • The Aesthetic Relations of Art to Reality (Esteticheskie otnosheniia iskusstva k deistvitel’nosti, 1855)
  • Critique of Philosophical Prejudices against Communal Ownership (Kritika filosofskikh predubezhdenii protiv obshchinnogo vladeniia, 1858)
  • The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy (Antropologicheskii printsip v filosofii, 1860)
  • What Is to Be Done? (Chto delat’?, 1863)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开