निकोलाई चेर्निशेव्स्की
मनुष्य एक ही प्राकृतिक सत्ता है; हर कोई स्वार्थ से कर्म करता है, और जो इसे ठीक से समझते हैं वे सहकारी काम और स्त्री-पुरुष समानता का समाज बनाएँगे।
पृष्ठभूमि
रूसी आलोचक और दार्शनिक जिन्होंने फ़ॉयरबाख़ के भौतिकवाद, एक तर्कसंगत अहंवाद और किसान-कम्यून में आशा को जोड़ा; 1862–63 में जेल में लिखा उनका उपन्यास “क्या करें?” रूसी क्रांतिकारियों की कई पीढ़ियों की पुस्तिका बन गया।
मुख्य विचार
- मानवशास्त्रीय भौतिकवाद
- तर्कसंगत अहंवाद
- समाजवाद के मार्ग के रूप में किसान-कम्यून
- “क्या करें?”
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 1
लुडविग फ़ॉयरबाख़
जिनसे प्रभावित
In The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy (1860) Chernyshevsky followed Feuerbach in treating the human being as a single natural organism, against any dualism of body and soul. N. Chernyshevsky, Antropologičeskij princip v filosofii (1860); A. Walicki, A History of Russian Thought (1979)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
लुडविग फ़ॉयरबाख़ › 1804–1872
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया 2
कार्ल मार्क्स
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
Marx praised Chernyshevsky’s critique of Mill (Capital, afterword 1873) and discussed his question whether Russia could reach socialism through the peasant commune (letter of 1877). K. Marx, Das Kapital I, afterword to the 2nd ed. (1873); letter to the editors of Otechestvennye Zapiski (1877, unsent); T. Shanin, Late Marx and the Russian Road (1983)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
कार्ल मार्क्स › 1818–1883
ज्यार्जी प्लेखानोव
जिन्हें प्रभावित किया
In his studies of Chernyshevsky (from 1890) Plekhanov claimed him as a forerunner of Russian Marxism whose view of history nonetheless remained idealist. G. Plekhanov, N. G. Chernyshevsky (1890; book 1910); S. H. Baron, Plekhanov: The Father of Russian Marxism (1963)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
ज्यार्जी प्लेखानोव › 1856–1918
आलोचना
जिनके द्वारा आलोचित 1
फ़्योदोर दोस्तोयेव्स्की
जिनके द्वारा आलोचित
Dostoevsky’s underground man (Notes from Underground, 1864) mocks the rational egoism and ‘crystal palace’ of Chernyshevsky’s What Is to Be Done?, valuing free will above advantage. F. Dostoevsky, Zapiski iz podpol’ya (1864), Part I, chs. 7–10; N. Chernyshevsky, Chto delat’? (1863); J. Frank, Dostoevsky: The Stir of Liberation, 1860–1865 (1986)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
फ़्योदोर दोस्तोयेव्स्की › 1821–1881
कृतियाँ
फ़ॉयरबाख़ के बाद भौतिकवाद का कार्यक्रम: मनुष्य एक ही प्राकृतिक सत्ता है, और नीतिशास्त्र को प्रबुद्ध स्वार्थ पर टिकना चाहिए।
- 1863क्या करें?
“नए लोगों” के बारे में जेल में लिखा उपन्यास जो तर्कसंगत अहंवाद, सहकारी काम और स्त्री-पुरुष समानता पर जीते हैं; यह रूसी क्रांतिकारियों के लिए आदर्श बन गया।
मत
Chernyshevsky is on the map as the main theorist of the Russian radicals of the 1860s. In “The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy” (1860) he followed Feuerbach: the human being is a single natural organism, and morality is explained by self-interest, which, rightly understood, coincides with the interest of society. His economic writings defended the peasant commune, which he thought might allow Russia to pass to socialism without going through the full development of capitalism – a question that Marx, who learned Russian partly to read him and praised him in the afterword to “Capital” (1873), later took up in his writings on the Russian commune. “What Is to Be Done?” turned these ideas into a model of life for the “new people” and inspired many revolutionaries; Lenin named his pamphlet of 1902 after it. Plekhanov wrote a monograph on him and saw him as a forerunner of Russian Marxism. Objections came early: the Kyiv philosopher Pamfil Yurkevych criticised his materialism, Dostoevsky’s “Notes from Underground” (1864) rejected the “Crystal Palace” of a rationally calculated happiness, and Vladimir Nabokov later satirised his life in the novel “The Gift”.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Nikolai Chernyshevsky was born on 24 July 1828 in Saratov, the son of a priest, and attended the seminary there before studying history and philology at St Petersburg University from 1846 to 1850. After teaching at the Saratov gymnasium he returned to the capital in 1853 and joined the journal “The Contemporary” (Sovremennik), edited by the poet Nikolai Nekrasov, where he and Nikolai Dobrolyubov became the leading voices of the radical intelligentsia. His master’s thesis on the aesthetic relations of art to reality (1855) declared that the beautiful is life. In the debates on the emancipation of the serfs (1861) he defended the peasant commune and criticised the terms of the reform. In July 1862 he was arrested and held in the Peter and Paul Fortress, where he wrote “What Is to Be Done?”; the novel passed the censors and appeared in Sovremennik in 1863. On evidence that was partly fabricated he was sentenced in 1864 to hard labour and lifelong exile in Siberia, after a mock public execution in St Petersburg. He spent almost twenty years in Siberia, much of it in Vilyuysk in Yakutia, was allowed to settle in Astrakhan in 1883 and in Saratov in 1889, where he died on 29 October 1889.
अन्य प्रमुख कृतियाँ
- The Aesthetic Relations of Art to Reality (Esteticheskie otnosheniia iskusstva k deistvitel’nosti, 1855)
- Critique of Philosophical Prejudices against Communal Ownership (Kritika filosofskikh predubezhdenii protiv obshchinnogo vladeniia, 1858)
- The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy (Antropologicheskii printsip v filosofii, 1860)
- What Is to Be Done? (Chto delat’?, 1863)
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है