Pierre Gassendi
Wszystko, co wiemy, zaczyna się od zmysłów, i wiemy, jak rzeczy się jawią, a nie czym są same w sobie; atomy Epikura najlepiej wyjaśniają przyrodę, pod warunkiem że Bóg je stwarza i nimi rządzi.
Umiejscowienie
Prowansalski ksiądz, astronom i profesor matematyki w Paryżu, który ożywił atomizm Epikura w formie chrześcijańskiej – atomy stworzone przez Boga, nieśmiertelna dusza, opatrzność – i który zarzucił „Medytacjom” Kartezjusza, że całe nasze poznanie pochodzi ze zmysłów i sięga zjawisk, a nie istot.
Kluczowe idee
- Schrystianizowany atomizm epikurejski
- Poznanie zaczyna się od zmysłów
- Piąte zarzuty wobec Kartezjusza
- Złagodzony sceptycyzm: zjawiska, nie istoty
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 4
Epikur
pod wpływem ✓
Gassendi set out to revive Epicurus’ atomism and ethics of tranquillity, purged of what Christianity could not accept, in his Life of Epicurus (1647) and Syntagma philosophicum (1658). P. Gassendi, De vita et moribus Epicuri (1647); Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii (1649); Syntagma philosophicum (1658); SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Epikur › 341–270 p.n.e.
Lukrecjusz
pod wpływem
For his reconstruction of atomism in the Syntagma philosophicum (1658) Gassendi drew on Lucretius’ On the Nature of Things, the fullest surviving account of Epicurean physics. P. Gassendi, Syntagma philosophicum (1658); Lucretius, De rerum natura; SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
Źródło: szkic AI
Lukrecjusz › ok. 99–55 p.n.e.
Sekstus Empiryk
pod wpływem
Gassendi’s early Paradoxical Exercises against the Aristotelians (1624) used the sceptical arguments of Sextus, which he later moderated into a constructive scepticism about appearances. P. Gassendi, Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (1624); R. H. Popkin, The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle (2003); SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
Źródło: szkic AI
Sekstus Empiryk › ok. 160–210
Galileusz
pod wpływem
Gassendi corresponded with Galileo and tested his principle of shared motion by dropping stones from a moving ship’s mast (On Motion Impressed by a Moving Mover, 1642). P. Gassendi, De motu impresso a motore translato (1642); SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
Źródło: szkic AI
Galileusz › 1564–1642
Wpływ na 1
John Locke
wpływ na sporne
During his years in France (1675–79) Locke met François Bernier, whose abridgement spread Gassendi’s philosophy; how much the Essay owes to Gassendi is disputed. F. Bernier, Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi (1674–78); R. W. Puster, Britische Gassendi-Rezeption am Beispiel John Lockes (1991); T. M. Lennon, The Battle of the Gods and Giants (1993); SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
Źródło: szkic AI
John Locke › 1632–1704
Krytyka
Wzajemna krytyka 1
Kartezjusz ⇄ wzajemnie
krytykuje
In the Fifth Objections (1641; expanded as Disquisitio metaphysica, 1644) Gassendi doubted innate ideas and asked how an unextended mind could move a body. Descartes, Meditationes (1641), Fifth Objections (AT VII 256–346); P. Gassendi, Disquisitio metaphysica (1644); SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
Źródło: szkic AI
krytyka ze strony
Descartes replied to Gassendi’s Fifth Objections (1641) addressing him as ‘flesh’ and arguing that Gassendi, wanting to grasp everything through images, confused pure understanding with imagination. Descartes, Fifth Replies (AT VII 347–390); letter to Clerselier, 12 Jan. 1646 (AT IX-1 202–217)
Źródło: szkic AI
Kartezjusz › 1596–1650
Krytykuje 1
Arystoteles
krytykuje
In his Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (1624) Gassendi attacked Aristotelian logic and physics as taught in the schools, later setting Epicurean atomism against them. P. Gassendi, Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (1624); Syntagma philosophicum (1658); SEP “Pierre Gassendi”
Źródło: szkic AI
Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.
Dzieła
Piąte zarzuty Gassendiego do „Medytacji”, odpowiedzi Kartezjusza i riposty Gassendiego, punkt po punkcie: umysł poznaje siebie i Boga tylko przez idee czerpane ze zmysłów, a istnienie można by wywnioskować z każdego działania, z chodzenia tak samo jak z myślenia.
Jego pośmiertny system z logiki, fizyki i etyki: atomy i próżnia Epikura, lecz stworzone przez Boga i w skończonej liczbie, nieśmiertelna dusza rozumna i szczęście spokojnego umysłu i ciała wolnego od bólu.
Stanowisko
Gassendi set out to replace Aristotle’s natural philosophy with that of Epicurus, purged of what a Christian could not accept. Matter consists of indivisible atoms moving in a void, but the atoms are created by God, finite in number and set in motion by him; the world is governed by providence, and besides the material soul that humans share with animals there is an immortal rational soul. In the theory of knowledge he took a middle way between dogmatism and Pyrrhonian scepticism: all knowledge starts from the senses, and reason reaches the appearances of things and their probable causes, not their inner essences. This was the basis of his objections to Descartes. The mind, he argued, has no idea of itself or of God that does not come from sensory experience; Descartes could have inferred his existence from any of his actions, not only from thinking; and it is unclear how a mind without extension could be united with a body. He addressed Descartes as “O mind”, and Descartes answered “O flesh”. His ethics follows Epicurus: happiness is tranquillity of mind and the absence of bodily pain. Through the abridgement of his philosophy by his pupil François Bernier (1674–1678) and through Walter Charleton in England his atomism reached Boyle, Locke and Newton, though how much each of them owed to him is still debated.
Życie i kontekst
Pierre Gassendi was born on 22 January 1592 in Champtercier near Digne in Provence, into a farming family. He studied at Digne and Aix, took a doctorate in theology at Avignon in 1614 and became a priest. From 1617 to 1623 he taught philosophy at the University of Aix, and his lectures against Aristotle became the first book of his Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (1624). When the Jesuits took over the college his teaching there ended; he remained a canon, and from 1634 provost, of the cathedral chapter of Digne. Through the antiquarian Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc and the Minim friar Marin Mersenne he joined the learned correspondence of Europe. In 1631 he was the first to observe a transit of Mercury across the Sun, which Kepler had predicted, and in 1640 he had a stone dropped from the mast of a moving galley at Marseille to show, in support of Galileo, that it lands at the foot of the mast. In 1641 he wrote the Fifth Objections to Descartes’ Meditations and in 1644 published the whole exchange with his rejoinders. Appointed professor of mathematics at the Collège royal in Paris in 1645, he gave up teaching after a few years because of illness. He wrote lives of Peiresc (1641) and of Epicurus (1647) and a large commentary on the tenth book of Diogenes Laertius (1649). He died in Paris on 24 October 1655; his Syntagma philosophicum appeared in his collected works (Lyon, 1658).
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (book I, 1624)
- Fifth Objections to Descartes’ Meditations (1641)
- Life of Peiresc (Viri illustris Nicolai Claudii Fabricii de Peiresc vita, 1641)
- On the Life and Character of Epicurus (De vita et moribus Epicuri, 1647)
- Notes on the Tenth Book of Diogenes Laertius (Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii, 1649)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora