作品 · 伊斯兰世界的哲学
决定性论述(Fasl al-maqal)
一份关于哲学的法律意见:对有能力从事论证推理的人,《古兰经》本身就命令这样做;当证明与经文的字面意义发生冲突时,经文应当加以诠释。
简介
Averroes wrote the treatise around 1179, as a judge (qadi) and in the form of a legal question: is the study of philosophy and logic permitted, forbidden, recommended or obligatory under the religious law? His answer is that verses such as “Reflect, you who have vision” (Qur’an 59:2) make demonstrative reasoning obligatory for those capable of it. Since truth does not contradict truth, a passage of scripture must be interpreted where a demonstrated conclusion conflicts with its apparent sense – but such interpretations belong to the learned and should not be spread among people who are persuaded by rhetoric or dialectic. He also argues that al-Ghazali was wrong to declare the philosophers unbelievers over the eternity of the world and God’s knowledge. The treatise was not translated into Latin in the Middle Ages; Marcus Joseph Müller edited the Arabic text in Munich in 1859, and it has since become a standard text on faith and reason.
阅读全文
免费全文,常为较早的版本或译本
联系
回应了
- 哲学家的矛盾1095 · 安萨里
伊本·鲁世德(阿威罗伊) 的更多作品
- 约1180年矛盾的矛盾
- 约1190年亚里士多德著作大注疏
截至 2026年11月 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的