Agora思想的公共广场

福斯托·雷纳加

1906–1994

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

玻利维亚的“印第安人”(indio)不是农民,而是一个被殖民民族的成员;无论右派还是混血左派都无法带来解放——解放必须是一场由“印第安人”自己发动的印第安革命。

定位

原住民哲学 · 拉丁美洲与加勒比 · 政治与法, 社会与历史, 形而上学

来自波托西北部的玻利维亚作家和政治家,1962年创立艾马拉和克丘亚印第安人党;他的《印第安革命》(1970)是印第安主义(indianismo)的奠基文本,主张玻利维亚的“印第安人”(indios)不是“农民”,而是一个必须自我解放的被殖民民族。

核心思想

  • 印第安主义(由“印第安人”自己主导)而非土著主义(由他人为他们制定的政策)
  • 是“印第安人”(indio)而非农民
  • 两个玻利维亚
  • 对西方思想的批判

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 1

  • 弗朗茨·法农

    受其影响

    In his Indianist writings from 1969–70 Reinaga drew on Fanon’s analysis of colonial racism and the colonised mind and applied it to the Andes (La revolución india, 1970). F. Reinaga, La revolución india (1970); J. A. Lucero, “Fanon in the Andes: Fausto Reinaga, Indianismo, and the Black Atlantic”, International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies 1 (2008)

    依据: AI 草稿

    弗朗茨·法农 › 1925–1961

影响了 1

  • 西尔维娅·里韦拉·库西坎基

    影响了

    Rivera Cusicanqui, who in 1984 treated Reinaga’s indianismo as a minor strand of the Aymara movement, later called him a fundamental thinker of Aymara-Quechua renewal (La Jornada, 2015). S. Rivera Cusicanqui, Oprimidos pero no vencidos (1984); “Hambre de conocimiento indígena”, La Jornada (11 Apr. 2015), on her Hambre de huelga (2014)

    依据: AI 草稿

    西尔维娅·里韦拉·库西坎基 › 1949年生

批评

批评了 1

  • 卡尔·马克思

    批评了

    After his Marxist phase Reinaga rejected Marxism as a European doctrine: the Indians are an oppressed people, not a class, and must liberate themselves (La revolución india, 1970). F. Reinaga, La revolución india (1970); Tesis india (1971); Á. García Linera, “El desencuentro de dos razones revolucionarias. Indianismo y marxismo”, Cuadernos del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 3 (2007)

    依据: AI 草稿

    卡尔·马克思 › 1818–1883

作品

  • 印第安主义的宣言(这里的“印第安人”指安第斯山区的艾马拉人、克丘亚人等原住民民族):玻利维亚分裂为一个印第安民族和一个混血—白人民族;1952年革命把“印第安人”变成“农民”,却没有结束殖民统治,他们的解放必须由他们自己完成,不受左派或右派的监护。

立场

Reinaga is on the map as the founder of indianismo, the current of Andean thought that made the Indians themselves the subject of their liberation – unlike indigenismo, a policy for Indigenous peoples made by others. After the revolution of 1952 the Bolivian state had renamed the Aymara and Quechua “campesinos”, peasants, and integrated them through land reform and unions. Reinaga rejected the label: the Indian question is not a class question but that of a colonised nation, and in Bolivia an Indian nation lives under the rule of a mestizo-white one – there are “two Bolivias”. Liberation must therefore be the work of the Indians themselves, against the paternalism of the right and of the Marxist left alike. For this argument he drew on Frantz Fanon, whose analysis of colonial racism and of the colonised mind he applied to the Andes, while he rejected Marxism itself as a European doctrine; Álvaro García Linera later called the relation between indianismo and Marxism a “desencuentro”, a missed encounter, and described Reinaga as the most influential intellectual of indianismo in its formative period. His later works reject Western thought as a whole as a philosophy of violence and set an Andean wisdom against it; critics charge the opposition of Indian and Western with essentialism and with reversing racial categories rather than overcoming them, while others read it as a philosophy of Indian liberation. In 1984 Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui treated his party and ideas as a minor strand of the Aymara movement; later she called his thought seminal for her own and him a fundamental thinker of the Aymara and Quechua renaissance (as reported in La Jornada, 2015). How far the katarista manifestos of the 1970s took up his writings is debated.

生平与背景

Fausto Reinaga, born José Félix Reinaga Chavarría on 27 March 1906 in San Pedro de Macha in the province of Chayanta in northern Potosí, came from an Indigenous family of the region and called himself, deliberately, an “indio”. He studied law at the Universidad Mayor de San Francisco Xavier in Sucre and qualified as a lawyer. In his early writings he combined Marxism with indigenismo; in 1957 he travelled to Leipzig and the Soviet Union, sent, according to different accounts, by the Communist Party of Bolivia or as part of a trade-union delegation. He then broke with the communists and on 15 November 1962 founded the Partido de Indios Aymaras y Keswas, later renamed Partido Indio de Bolivia. Scholars distinguish three phases in his work: an indigenist-Marxist phase until about 1960, an indianista phase in which he wrote “La revolución india” (1970) and “Tesis india” (1971), and from the mid-1970s an “amáutic” phase with works such as “La razón y el indio” (1978) and “La revolución amáutica” (1981), named after the amautas, the sages of the Inca empire. He died in La Paz on 19 August 1994.

其他主要作品

  • The Indian Revolution (La revolución india, 1970)
  • Indian Thesis (Tesis india, 1971)
  • Indian America and the West (América india y Occidente, 1974)
  • Reason and the Indian (La razón y el indio, 1978)
  • Amautic Thought (El pensamiento amáutico, 1978)
  • The Amautic Revolution (La revolución amáutica, 1981)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开