Agora思想的公共广场

海什木

约965–1040年

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

海什木认为,我们看见是因为光和颜色从物体的每一点进入眼睛,而不是因为眼睛发出射线;知觉还包含判断与推断,关于自然的论断必须经受受控实验的检验。

定位

伊斯兰世界的哲学 · 西亚与北非 · 科学, 认识论, 心灵与意识

来自巴士拉、在开罗工作的数学家和自然哲学家:他的《光学之书》用从可见物体每一点射入眼睛的光来解释视觉,用受控实验检验论断,并分析心灵如何推断所见之物;其拉丁文本 De aspectibus 成为欧洲光学的基础。

核心思想

  • 视觉源于射入眼中的光
  • 看包含判断与推断
  • 以受控实验检验(iʿtibār)
  • 对托勒密模型的质疑

在星图中打开

影响

影响了 2

  • 纳西尔丁·图西

    影响了

    Al-Tusi’s non-Ptolemaic planetary models in his Memoir on Astronomy (1261), with the “Tusi couple”, belong to the response of the Maragha astronomers to objections against Ptolemy’s models of the kind Ibn al-Haytham had raised in his Doubts; the connection is one of programme rather than direct commentary. G. Saliba, Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance (2007); F. J. Ragep, Nasir al-Din al-Tusi’s Memoir on Astronomy (1993)

    依据: AI 草稿

    纳西尔丁·图西 › 1201–1274

  • 罗吉尔·培根

    影响了

    Roger Bacon based the theory of vision in the Perspectiva of his Opus maius (1267) largely on Ibn al-Haytham’s Optics in its Latin translation, De aspectibus. Roger Bacon, Opus maius, part V (1267); D. C. Lindberg, Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler (1976); SEP “Roger Bacon”

    依据: AI 草稿

    罗吉尔·培根 › 约1219–1292年

作品

  • 对托勒密《天文学大成》《行星假说》和《光学》的批判:托勒密的某些模型,如偏心匀速点,与他自己的天体作匀速圆周运动的原则相矛盾;真正的结构仍有待发现。该论著开启了伊斯兰世界长久的非托勒密天文学传统。

  • 约1030年光学之书

    关于视觉的七卷书:光和颜色从物体的每一点向各个方向辐射,眼睛通过接收它们而看见;海什木以实验支持这一点,讨论反射与折射,并分析心灵借以认出所见之物的推断。约1200年被译成拉丁文,题为 De aspectibus。

立场

Ibn al-Haytham is on the map for his theory of vision and for a method that joined mathematical demonstration, experiment and an account of perception. Earlier theories held either that the eye sends out visual rays, as Euclid, Ptolemy and al-Kindi taught, or that objects send forms or images to the eye through a medium, as the atomists and, in his own way, Aristotle held. In the Book of Optics Ibn al-Haytham argued that light and colour radiate from every point of a lit object in straight lines in all directions, and that the eye sees by receiving the rays that fall perpendicularly on it, so that each point of the object corresponds to a point in the eye. He supported this with long series of experiments with dark chambers, tubes and screens – a procedure he called iʿtibār, “testing” – and treated reflection and refraction mathematically. Perception, he held, is not only the reception of light: the mind recognises objects, their size, distance and shape by judgement and inference, often so quickly that we do not notice, and errors of sight can be explained as failures of these inferences. In the Doubts concerning Ptolemy he applied the same critical attitude to astronomy: some of Ptolemy’s models break his own principle of uniform circular motion, so that the true configuration of the heavens remains to be found. The Optics was translated into Latin around 1200 as De aspectibus; Roger Bacon, John Pecham and Witelo built on it, Kepler’s optics answered it, and Friedrich Risner printed it in 1572. The Doubts opened a tradition of non-Ptolemaic astronomy that continued in Maragha with Nasir al-Din al-Tusi. A. I. Sabra’s edition and translation of the Optics (1983, 1989) made it a subject of the modern philosophy of perception as well as of the history of science.

生平与背景

Abu ʿAli al-Hasan ibn al-Hasan ibn al-Haytham was born in Basra around 965. According to later biographers he held an administrative post there before turning to science, and went to Egypt under the Fatimid caliph al-Hakim, reportedly with a plan to regulate the Nile flood, which he abandoned when he saw the river. A widely repeated story says that he then feigned madness to escape the caliph’s anger until al-Hakim’s death in 1021; it comes from sources written long afterwards. In Cairo he lived by copying and teaching mathematical works and wrote most of his more than ninety treatises on mathematics, optics, astronomy and natural philosophy. Lists of his writings, one of them in his own words, survive in the biographical dictionary of Ibn Abi Usaybiʿa. He died in Cairo around 1040.

其他主要作品

  • Book of Optics (Kitāb al-manāẓir; Latin De aspectibus or Perspectiva)
  • Doubts concerning Ptolemy (al-Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs)
  • On the Light of the Moon
  • On the Shape of the Eclipse
  • On the Configuration of the World (Fī hayʾat al-ʿālam; attribution debated)
  • Commentary on the Premises of Euclid, with an attempt to prove the parallel postulate

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开