阿斯玛·巴拉斯
阿斯玛·巴拉斯认为,古兰经作为整体并依真主的独一、公正与无可比拟的原则来读,并不教导父权制:真主超越性别,没有哪个男人是真主派来管辖女人的代理人,父权式解读来自解释者。
定位
巴基斯坦裔美国政治学者,是巴基斯坦外交部门最早的女性之一,齐亚·哈克时期被解职,曾在伊萨卡学院任教:在《伊斯兰中的信女》(2002年)中,她主张将古兰经作为整体并依真主的独一、公正与无可比拟来阅读,并不支持父权制;父权式解读来自解释者,而非经文。
核心思想
- 摆脱父权式解释
- 真主独一(tawḥīd)排除男性主权
- 真主超越性与性别
- 将古兰经作为整体并结合语境阅读
影响
受影响于 2
法兹鲁尔·拉赫曼
受其影响
Barlas’s reading of the Qur’an as a whole and in its historical context, against the authority of secondary texts, takes up Fazlur Rahman’s hermeneutics; the connection is documented in studies of her method. A. Barlas, Believing Women in Islam (2002); review in American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences; theses Bergen (2013) and Leiden (2020)
依据: AI 草稿
法兹鲁尔·拉赫曼 › 1919–1988
阿米娜·瓦杜德
受其影响
Barlas wrote a study of Amina Wadud’s hermeneutics (2004) and, like Wadud in Qur’an and Woman (1992), reads the Qur’an intratextually against patriarchal exegesis. A. Barlas, “Amina Wadud’s Hermeneutics of the Qur’an: Women Rereading Sacred Texts”, in S. Taji-Farouki (ed.), Modern Muslim Intellectuals and the Qur’an (2004); Believing Women in Islam (2002)
依据: AI 草稿
阿米娜·瓦杜德 › 1952年生
作品
对古兰经及其注释的研究:经文既没有把真主表现为男性,也没有把男人表现为真主派来管辖女人的代理人;作为整体、结合历史语境并依据真主独一、公正和无可比拟的原则来读,它把女人和男人都视为平等的道德行动者。
立场
Asma Barlas is on the map as one of the authors who founded a feminist hermeneutics of the Qur’an from within the tradition. “Believing Women in Islam” (2002) distinguishes the Qur’an from its exegesis: the patriarchal readings that dominate classical commentary and law, she argues, arise from the interpreters, their societies and the secondary texts on which they relied, not from the Qur’an itself. Three principles guide her reading. Because of God’s unity (tawḥīd), no human being shares God’s sovereignty, so that a husband’s or father’s rule over women would amount to setting up a rival to God; because of God’s justice, the Qur’an cannot be read as commanding injustice to women; and because God is incomparable, God is beyond sex and cannot be represented as male or as father. Read as a whole, through its own internal relations and in the historical context of its revelation, the Qur’an addresses women and men as equal moral agents; where it seems to grant men authority, it responds to the conditions of seventh-century Arabia without making them a norm. Her method takes up Fazlur Rahman’s insistence on reading the Qur’an historically and as a whole, and Amina Wadud’s intratextual reading, on whose hermeneutics she wrote a study (2004). Margot Badran (2009) counts the book among the founding works of Islamic feminism; Barlas herself has preferred to describe her work as a critique of patriarchy from within Islam rather than to adopt the label “feminist”.
生平与背景
Asma Barlas was born on 10 March 1950 in Pakistan. After studying English literature and philosophy and taking a master’s degree in journalism, she entered Pakistan’s foreign service in 1976 as one of its first women officers. She was dismissed in 1982 on the orders of General Zia ul-Haq, worked for a time as assistant editor of the newspaper The Muslim, and in 1983 received political asylum in the United States. She took a doctorate in international studies at the University of Denver and from 1991 taught politics at Ithaca College in New York, where she directed its Center for the Study of Culture, Race and Ethnicity; in 2008 she held the Spinoza chair of philosophy at the University of Amsterdam.
其他主要作品
- Democracy, Nationalism and Communalism: The Colonial Legacy in South Asia (1995)
- Believing Women in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur’an (2002; revised edition 2019)
- Islam, Muslims, and the US: Essays on Religion and Politics (2004)
- “Amina Wadud’s Hermeneutics of the Qur’an: Women Rereading Sacred Texts”, in S. Taji-Farouki (ed.), Modern Muslim Intellectuals and the Qur’an (2004)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的