Henri de Saint-Simon
Nowoczesnym społeczeństwem powinni kierować ci, którzy produkują – uczeni, inżynierowie, bankierzy i robotnicy – a nie szlachta i próżniacy, a jego celem powinna być poprawa losu najuboższych.
Umiejscowienie
Arystokrata, spekulant i prorok społeczny: społeczeństwem przemysłowym powinni kierować nie szlachcice, żołnierze i prawnicy, lecz jego producenci – uczeni, inżynierowie, bankierzy, robotnicy – według nauki o społeczeństwie.
Kluczowe idee
- Społeczeństwo przemysłowe i „industriels”
- Rządy producentów zamiast „próżniaków”
- Nauka o społeczeństwie (fizjologia społeczna)
- Nowe chrześcijaństwo
Uczniowie: Auguste Comte
Wpływ
Wpływ na 3
Auguste Comte uczeń/uczennica
uczeń/uczennica ✓
Comte was Saint-Simon’s secretary and collaborator from 1817 until their break in 1824; his early writings show Saint-Simon’s influence. SEP “Auguste Comte”; M. Pickering, Auguste Comte: An Intellectual Biography I (1993)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Auguste Comte › 1798–1857
Fryderyk Engels
wpływ na
Engels credited Saint-Simon with foreseeing that the government of persons would give way to the administration of things (Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, 1880). F. Engels, Die Entwicklung des Sozialismus von der Utopie zur Wissenschaft (French 1880, German 1882); Anti-Dühring (1878)
Źródło: szkic AI
Fryderyk Engels › 1820–1895
Émile Durkheim
wpływ na
In lectures on socialism (1895–96, printed 1928) Durkheim called Saint-Simon the true originator of positivism and sociology, taking up his call for moral regulation of industrial society. É. Durkheim, Le Socialisme, ed. M. Mauss (1928); S. Lukes, Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work (1973)
Źródło: szkic AI
Émile Durkheim › 1858–1917
Dzieła
Pytania i odpowiedzi o społeczeństwie, w którym władzę sprawują producenci, a nie szlachta i urzędnicy – trzecią część napisał Comte.
Religia sprowadzona do jednej zasady: społeczeństwo musi pracować nad jak najszybszą poprawą losu najuboższej klasy.
Stanowisko
Saint-Simon saw the Revolution as an unfinished transition. The old order of priests and feudal lords had been destroyed, but no new order had replaced it. That order, he argued, had to be industrial: in modern society the “industriels” – all who produce, from farmers and workers to engineers, merchants and bankers – should govern, together with scientists who know the laws of social life, while the “idlers” of nobility, army and bureaucracy should lose their power. Politics would become administration: “the government of men” would give way to “the administration of things”, as Engels later summarised him. Saint-Simon called for a science of society on the model of physiology and expected it to be as exact as the natural sciences. In his last work, New Christianity (1825), he reduced religion to one rule: society must work for the fastest possible improvement of the poorest class. After his death Prosper Enfantin and Saint-Amand Bazard turned his ideas into a movement that was partly a church, partly a school of engineers and bankers who later built railways and promoted the Suez Canal. Marx and Engels counted him among the “utopian socialists”; Durkheim, in lectures of 1895–96, called him the true originator of positivism and sociology, and Comte’s dependence on him has been debated ever since. Critics have pointed to the technocratic and authoritarian side of a society run by experts, and like many contemporaries he took Europe’s civilising mission for granted.
Życie i kontekst
Claude-Henri de Rouvroy, comte de Saint-Simon, was born in Paris in 1760 into a family of the high nobility. As a young officer he fought on the American side in the War of Independence and was captured by the British in 1782. During the Revolution he renounced his title, made a fortune speculating in confiscated church and noble property, and was imprisoned during the Terror until the fall of Robespierre in 1794. He spent the money on a salon for scientists and was soon poor. From 1814 to 1817 the historian Augustin Thierry worked as his secretary, from 1817 to 1824 the young Auguste Comte. His “parable” of 1819, which held that France would lose nothing if its princes and officials died but would be ruined if it lost its best scientists, artisans and bankers, brought him a trial and an acquittal. In 1823, in debt and isolated, he shot himself and lost an eye. He died in Paris in 1825.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Letters from an Inhabitant of Geneva (Lettres d’un habitant de Genève, 1803)
- On the Reorganisation of European Society (with Augustin Thierry, 1814)
- L’Organisateur (1819–20)
- On the Industrial System (Du système industriel, 1821–22)
- Catechism of the Industrialists (Catéchisme des industriels, 1823–24)
- New Christianity (Nouveau christianisme, 1825)
Pojawia się w
- Podróż „Jak socjologia wyłoniła się z filozofii” · Przystanek 7 z 12
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora