उम्बर्तो एको
हर कृति खुली है: वह अनेक पाठों को आमंत्रित करती है और पाठक का सहयोग माँगती है; फिर भी वह असीम रूप से खुली नहीं, क्योंकि पाठ स्वयं, उसकी संहिताएँ और उसका आशय ऐसी सीमाएँ रखते हैं जिन्हें कोई व्याख्या चूक सकती है।
पृष्ठभूमि
पीडमोंट के संकेत-विज्ञानी, दार्शनिक और उपन्यासकार जिन्होंने आधुनिक कलाकृति को “खुली कृति” के रूप में वर्णित किया जो पाठक के सहयोग की माँग करती है, चिह्नों और संकेत-संहिताओं का सामान्य सिद्धांत रचा, और बाद में व्याख्या की सीमाओं का बचाव किया; उनके उपन्यास “द नेम ऑफ़ द रोज़” (1980) ने उन्हें दुनिया भर में प्रसिद्ध किया।
मुख्य विचार
- खुली कृति
- चिह्नों और संहिताओं का सामान्य सिद्धांत
- आदर्श पाठक
- व्याख्या की सीमाएँ
प्रभाव
जिनसे प्रभावित 2
थामस एक्विनास
जिनसे प्रभावित ✓
Eco’s thesis, Il problema estetico in San Tommaso (1956), reconstructed Aquinas’s aesthetics of proportion, integrity and clarity; his medieval studies later informed The Name of the Rose (1980). U. Eco, Il problema estetico in San Tommaso (1956; rev. as Il problema estetico in Tommaso d’Aquino, 1970); Il nome della rosa (1980); SEP “Thomas Aquinas”
साक्ष्य: Wikidata में भी · Wikidata
थामस एक्विनास › लगभग 1225–1274
चार्ल्स सैंडर्स पियर्स
जिनसे प्रभावित ✓
Eco took Peirce’s interpretant and unlimited semiosis, every sign interpreted by further signs, as the basis of his general semiotics (Trattato di semiotica generale, 1975). U. Eco, Trattato di semiotica generale (1975); Lector in fabula (1979); SEP “Charles Sanders Peirce”
साक्ष्य: Wikidata में भी · Wikidata
चार्ल्स सैंडर्स पियर्स › 1839–1914
आलोचना
जिनके द्वारा आलोचित 1
रिचर्ड रोर्टी
जिनके द्वारा आलोचित
Rorty rejected Eco’s distinction between interpreting and using a text, holding that all readings simply put texts to use (‘The Pragmatist’s Progress’, in Eco, Interpretation and Overinterpretation, 1992). R. Rorty, “The Pragmatist’s Progress”, in U. Eco et al., Interpretation and Overinterpretation (1992; Tanner Lectures, Cambridge 1990)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
रिचर्ड रोर्टी › 1931–2007
जिनकी आलोचना की 1
क्लोद लेवी-स्त्रोस
जिनकी आलोचना की
In La struttura assente (1968) Eco objected that Lévi-Strauss turns structure from a methodological model into an ontological reality, the structure of the human mind. U. Eco, La struttura assente (1968)
साक्ष्य: AI मसौदा
क्लोद लेवी-स्त्रोस › 1908–2009
कृतियाँ
- 1962खुली कृति
संगीत, साहित्य और कला की आधुनिक कृतियों का अध्ययन जो जानबूझकर अस्पष्ट या अधूरी हैं और व्याख्याता से उन्हें पूरा करने की अपेक्षा करती हैं।
संहिताओं और चिह्न-उत्पादन का सामान्य सिद्धांत जो अर्थ को सांस्कृतिक इकाइयों और व्याख्येयकों के जाल के रूप में देखता है।
मत
Eco’s philosophical work leads from aesthetics to a general semiotics. Trained in Pareyson’s theory of interpretation, he described in “The Open Work” how modern art builds ambiguity into the work and makes the interpreter a co-author, and he used information theory to describe this openness. In “The Absent Structure” he engaged with structuralism but criticised what he called the “ontological structuralism” of Claude Lévi-Strauss, which treats structures as real features of the mind rather than as models. From Charles S. Peirce he took the interpretant and the idea of unlimited semiosis: a sign is explained by further signs, without a final term. “A Theory of Semiotics” combines a theory of codes with a typology of sign production and criticises the idea that iconic signs simply resemble their objects. “Lector in fabula” (1979) introduced the model reader that a text foresees. From the late 1980s Eco turned against readings in which any meaning counts: in the Tanner Lectures he defended the intention of the text as a limit, while Richard Rorty replied that texts have no inner nature and that interpreting is a form of using. In “Kant and the Platypus” (1997) Eco returned to perception and reference and qualified the strong conventionalism of his earlier semiotics. His essays on mass culture and the essay “Ur-Fascism” (1995), which described fascism by fourteen typical features linked by family resemblance rather than by a definition, made him a public intellectual in Italy and beyond.
जीवन और संदर्भ
Umberto Eco was born on 5 January 1932 in Alessandria in Piedmont. He studied philosophy at the University of Turin under Luigi Pareyson and graduated in 1954 with a thesis on the aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, published in 1956. From 1954 he worked for the cultural programmes of the Italian broadcaster RAI and from 1959 as an editor at the publishing house Bompiani in Milan; he belonged to the literary neo-avant-garde Gruppo 63. After teaching in Turin, Milan and Florence he moved to the University of Bologna in 1971, where he held a chair of semiotics from 1975 and founded the journal VS (Versus). “The Open Work” (1962) and the essays on mass culture in “Apocalittici e integrati” (1964) made him known; “The Absent Structure” (1968) and “A Theory of Semiotics” (1975) set out his theory of signs. His first novel, “The Name of the Rose” (1980), won the Premio Strega and became an international success; “Foucault’s Pendulum” (1988) and other novels followed. In 1990 he gave the Tanner Lectures in Cambridge, published with responses as “Interpretation and Overinterpretation” (1992). He died in Milan on 19 February 2016.
अन्य प्रमुख कृतियाँ
- The Open Work (Opera aperta, 1962)
- The Absent Structure (La struttura assente, 1968)
- A Theory of Semiotics (Trattato di semiotica generale, 1975; English 1976)
- The Role of the Reader (Lector in fabula, 1979)
- The Limits of Interpretation (I limiti dell’interpretazione, 1990)
- Kant and the Platypus (Kant e l’ornitorinco, 1997)
नवंबर 2026 तक · स्रोत · इस पृष्ठ को बेहतर बनाएँ · Agora कैसे बना है