恩斯特·特勒尔奇
特勒尔奇认为,基督教应被理解为一种历史力量,它以教会、教派或神秘主义的形态出现,并相应地塑造社会;他还追问,当一切思想都被视为受历史制约之后,具有约束力的规范如何仍然可能。
定位
新教神学家和宗教史家,是韦伯在海德堡的亲密同事:他追溯教会与教派如何塑造了西方社会,并追问当一切思想都被视为历史性的之后,规范何以仍能成立。
核心思想
- 教会、教派与神秘主义作为基督教共同体的形式
- 历史主义与规范问题
影响
受影响于 2
威廉·狄尔泰
受其影响 存在争议
Troeltsch tried to join Dilthey’s hermeneutic tradition with the neo-Kantian methodology of Windelband and Rickert, and is reported to have dedicated his last book to Dilthey and Windelband; the dedication was not checked in the book. Article “Para além do neokantismo: o conceito de ciências ético-históricas em Ernst Troeltsch” (revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/44811), read via summary; dedication not checked in the book
依据: AI 草稿
威廉·狄尔泰 › 1833–1911
马克斯·韦伯 影响了
受其影响
Troeltsch developed his programme of theology as a historical-ethical cultural science chiefly in exchange with Weber at Heidelberg, out of which came the Social Teaching of 1912. Deutsche Biographie, “Troeltsch, Ernst” (F. W. Graf, NDB 26, 2016, p. 433 f.); NDB “Weber, Max” (F. W. Graf, NDB 27, 2020, pp. 474–479), on the Fachmenschenfreundschaft
依据: AI 草稿
影响了
Weber became acquainted through his Heidelberg colleague Troeltsch with the theological debate between Lutheran and Calvinist positions that lies behind the Protestant Ethic. SEP “Max Weber” (S. H. Kim), §2.2
依据: AI 草稿
马克斯·韦伯 › 1864–1920
作品
- 1912基督教会和团体的社会学说
对基督教会、教派和神秘主义团体的社会学说及其如何塑造西方社会的历史研究;它发展出教会、教派与神秘主义的类型学,源于特勒尔奇在海德堡与马克斯·韦伯的交流。
- 1922历史主义及其问题
一部未完成的历史哲学逻辑学著作的第一卷:特勒尔奇追问,当一切思想与文化都被视为受历史制约之后,规范和价值如何仍能具有约束力。
立场
Troeltsch is on the map as the theologian who became one of the classics of the historical sociology of religion. His Social Teaching of the Christian Churches and Groups (1912) follows how churches, sects and mystical groups from the early church to Protestantism have related to society, and develops the typology of church, sect and mysticism; it grew out of his exchange with Max Weber, which the NDB describes as a friendship between specialists (Fachmenschenfreundschaft). Weber in turn learned from him the theological debate between Lutheran and Calvinist positions that lies behind the Protestant Ethic. Troeltsch sought a new binding force for norms in inherited cultural traditions while accepting the relativity that historicism brings; his unfinished main work, Historicism and Its Problems (1922), asks how this is possible. He is reported to have tried to join Dilthey’s hermeneutic tradition with the neo-Kantian method of Windelband and Rickert; that link has not been checked in the sources and is marked as disputed. After his death his work fell into relative obscurity and regained attention from the 1970s.
生平与背景
Ernst Troeltsch was born on 17 February 1865 in Haunstetten near Augsburg. He studied Protestant theology in Erlangen, Berlin and Göttingen and habilitated in Göttingen in 1891 with a study of reason and revelation in Johann Gerhard and Melanchthon; there he joined the circle of the History of Religions School as its systematic theologian. In 1892 he became associate professor in Bonn and in 1894 full professor of systematic theology in Heidelberg, where he became a close colleague of Max Weber. He sat in the Baden First Chamber from 1909 and on the Heidelberg city council from 1912 to 1915. In 1915 he moved to a newly created chair in Berlin for the philosophy of religion, social and historical philosophy and the history of the Christian religion. From March 1919 to June 1920 he was parliamentary undersecretary in the Prussian Ministry of Science, Arts and Education. He died in Berlin on 1 February 1923.
其他主要作品
- The Absoluteness of Christianity and the History of Religions (Die Absolutheit des Christentums und die Religionsgeschichte, 1902)
- Protestant Christianity and Church in the Modern Age (Protestantisches Christentum und Kirche in der Neuzeit, 1906/09)
- The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches and Groups (Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen und Gruppen, 1912)
- Historicism and Its Problems (Der Historismus und seine Probleme, 1922)
截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的