Agora思想的公共广场

彼得·恰达耶夫

1794–1856

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

俄国至今游离于人类共同的历史之外,既不属于西方,也不属于东方;然而一个不受过去束缚的国家,也许能从欧洲的错误中学习,找到自己的使命。

定位

俄国宗教哲学 · 东欧 · 社会与历史, 宗教

俄国军官与哲学家,他于1836年发表的第一封《哲学书简》声称俄国处于人类历史之外;沙皇下令宣布他精神失常,而这封信开启了西方派与斯拉夫派之间的论争。

核心思想

  • 俄国在历史之外
  • 天主教基督教作为历史的承载者
  • 西方派与斯拉夫派
  • 《疯人的辩护》

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 1

  • 弗里德里希·威廉·约瑟夫·谢林

    受其影响 ✓

    Chaadaev met Schelling in Karlsbad in 1825 and later corresponded with him; his Philosophical Letters (1829–31) read history as providential, partly in Schelling’s terms. P. Chaadaev, Philosophical Letters (1829–31); A. Walicki, A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism (1979)

    依据: 亦见于 Wikidata · Wikidata

    弗里德里希·威廉·约瑟夫·谢林 › 1775–1854

影响了 1

  • 亚历山大·赫尔岑

    影响了

    Herzen called Chaadaev’s first Philosophical Letter (1836) ‘a shot in the dark night’ and took up its question of Russia’s place in history (My Past and Thoughts). A. Herzen, Byloe i dumy (My Past and Thoughts, 1852–68); A. Walicki, A History of Russian Thought (1979)

    依据: AI 草稿

    亚历山大·赫尔岑 › 1812–1870

作品

  • 1829—1831年用法语写成的八封书信;第一封于1836年以俄文发表,把俄国描述为一个既无过去、在历史中也无位置的国家,引发了关于俄国与欧洲的论争。

  • 恰达耶夫在被宣布为精神失常之后的回答:俄国缺乏历史,也可能是从欧洲的错误中学习的机会。

立场

Chaadaev stands at the beginning of modern Russian philosophy of history. Drawing on Schelling and on French Catholic thinkers such as Joseph de Maistre and Louis de Bonald, he read history as the work of Providence, carried by the Christian, above all Catholic, West, whose unity had created a continuous tradition of ideas, law and social forms. Russia, by contrast, had received its Christianity from Byzantium, stood outside that unity and so belonged “neither to the West nor to the East”; it had contributed nothing to the progress of the human mind. Herzen called the publication of the first letter a shot that rang out in the dark night. Both camps of the following debate began from it: the Westernisers took over the diagnosis, while Slavophiles such as Aleksei Khomiakov and Ivan Kireevsky answered it with an Orthodox counter-history. In the “Apology of a Madman” (1837) Chaadaev revised his judgement: precisely because Russia was not bound by a past, it might learn from Europe’s mistakes and one day have a task of its own. Critics have pointed to the tension between the two texts and to a Catholicising picture of history that leaves little room for the Orthodox tradition; most of the letters became known only after his death, some only in the twentieth century.

生平与背景

Pyotr Chaadaev was born in Moscow on 7 June 1794 (27 May Old Style); orphaned early, he was brought up by an aunt and by his uncle, Prince Shcherbatov. He studied at Moscow University and in 1812 joined the Semyonovsky Guards, fought at Borodino and in the campaigns of 1813–14 and entered Paris with the Russian army. As adjutant to General Vasilchikov he carried the report on the mutiny of the Semyonovsky regiment to Tsar Alexander I at Troppau in 1820 and left the service soon afterwards. A friend of Alexander Pushkin, who addressed poems to him, he was close to the circles of the later Decembrists. From 1823 to 1826 he travelled in Europe and met Schelling in Karlsbad in 1825. Back in Moscow he wrote eight “Philosophical Letters” in French in 1829–31. When the first appeared in Russian translation in the journal Teleskop in 1836, Nicholas I had the journal closed and its editor Nikolai Nadezhdin banished, and Chaadaev was officially declared insane and placed under medical supervision for about a year. He stayed in Moscow, a familiar figure in its salons, and died there on 26 April 1856.

其他主要作品

  • Philosophical Letters (Lettres philosophiques, 1829–31)
  • First Philosophical Letter, Russian translation (Filosoficheskoe pis’mo, Teleskop, 1836)
  • Apology of a Madman (Apologie d’un fou, 1837)
  • Selected Works (Œuvres choisies, ed. Ivan Gagarin, 1862)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开