AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Congkhapa

1357–1419

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Ponieważ nic nie ma stałej własnej natury, przyczyna i skutek mogą działać – pustka nie unieważnia świata codziennego, lecz go umożliwia.

Umiejscowienie

Filozofia południowoazjatycka i tybetańska · Metafizyka, Epistemologia, Religia

Tybetański filozof i założyciel szkoły Gelug: pustka nie unieważnia świata konwencjonalnego – właśnie dlatego, że rzeczy nie mają samoistnej natury, działają przyczyna i skutek.

Kluczowe idee

  • Prasangika Madhyamaka
  • Rozpoznanie przedmiotu negacji
  • Wielki traktat o stopniach drogi

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 4

  • Nagarjuna

    pod wpływem

    Tsongkhapa commented on Nagarjuna’s Root Verses in Ocean of Reasoning and insisted that emptiness negates intrinsic nature, not the conventional existence of things. Tsongkhapa, Ocean of Reasoning, tr. Geshe Ngawang Samten & J. L. Garfield (2006)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Nagarjuna › ok. 150–250

  • Czandrakirti

    pod wpływem

    Tsongkhapa based his Prasangika reading of emptiness on Chandrakirti and commented on his Introduction to the Middle Way in Illumination of the Thought. Tsongkhapa, dGongs pa rab gsal; T. Jinpa, Self, Reality and Reason in Tibetan Philosophy (2002)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Czandrakirti › ok. 600–650

  • Dharmakirti

    pod wpływem

    Tsongkhapa integrated Dharmakirti’s epistemology into his Madhyamaka and wrote an introduction to Dharmakirti’s seven logical treatises (Gateway to the Seven Treatises). T. Jinpa, Self, Reality and Reason in Tibetan Philosophy (2002); G. B. J. Dreyfus, Recognizing Reality (1997)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Dharmakirti › ok. 600–660

  • Atiśa

    pod wpływem

    Tsongkhapa’s Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path (1402) expands Atisha’s Lamp for the Path to Awakening, following its scheme of three kinds of persons. Tsongkhapa, Lam rim chen mo (1402), tr. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee, The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path (2000–04); Atisha, Bodhipathapradipa

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Atiśa › ok. 982–1054

Dzieła

Stanowisko

Tsongkhapa sought to unite rigorous reasoning with meditative practice. Following Candrakirti’s Prasangika Madhyamaka, he insisted on identifying the object of negation exactly: emptiness denies that things exist by their own nature, not that they exist at all. Precisely because they lack intrinsic nature, things can arise dependently, so cause and effect, ethics and valid conventional knowledge remain intact. He therefore opposed both a nihilistic reading of emptiness and a meditation that merely halts thought, and he integrated Dharmakirti’s epistemology. His Great Treatise expands Atisha’s Lamp. Sakya critics such as Gorampa attacked his interpretation, but his Gelug school, that of the Dalai Lamas, became Tibet’s dominant tradition.

Życie i kontekst

Tsongkhapa Lobsang Drakpa was born in 1357 in the Tsongkha region of Amdo in north-eastern Tibet. He became a novice as a child and at sixteen went to central Tibet, where he studied with masters of several schools, notably the Sakya scholar Rendawa. In 1409 he founded the Great Prayer Festival in Lhasa and the monastery of Ganden, where he died in 1419. His disciples built up the Gelug school.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path (Lamrim Chenmo, 1402)
  • Essence of Eloquence (Legshe Nyingpo, c. 1407–08)
  • Ocean of Reasoning (commentary on Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika, c. 1407–08)
  • Illumination of the Thought (Gongpa Rabsel, 1418)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd