Porfiriusz
Zanim zaczniesz dobrze rozumować, potrzebujesz jasnych pojęć – rodzaju, gatunku, różnicy, własności, przypadłości; czy rodzaje i gatunki istnieją poza umysłem, to głębsze pytanie, które celowo zostawił otwarte.
Umiejscowienie
Uczeń, wydawca i biograf Plotyna: uporządkował pisma nauczyciela jako Enneady; jego krótkie Wprowadzenie (Isagoge) do Kategorii Arystotelesa postawiło pytanie o uniwersalia, zostawiło je otwarte i stanęło u początku nauczania logiki po łacinie, syryjsku i arabsku przez ponad tysiąc lat.
Kluczowe idee
- Isagoge i pytanie o uniwersalia
- Wydanie Ennead i Życie Plotyna
- Przeciw jedzeniu mięsa i krwawym ofiarom (O wstrzemięźliwości)
- Przeciw chrześcijanom
Nauczyciele: Plotyn
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 3
Platon
pod wpływem
Porphyry commented on Plato’s Timaeus and other dialogues and argued for the harmony of Plato and Aristotle, shaping how later Platonists and Boethius read Plato. Porphyry, In Timaeum (fragments, ed. A. R. Sodano, 1964); SEP “Porphyry”
Źródło: szkic AI
Platon › 428–348 p.n.e.
Arystoteles
pod wpływem
Porphyry wrote the Isagoge as an introduction to Aristotle’s Categories and held his logic compatible with Plato’s metaphysics, making Aristotle part of the Platonist curriculum. Porphyry, Isagoge; On Aristotle’s Categories (by question and answer); SEP “Porphyry”
Źródło: szkic AI
Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.
Wpływ na 4
Proklos
wpływ na
Proclus’ commentary on the Timaeus cites and discusses Porphyry’s interpretations throughout, often against him, and so is a main source for Porphyry’s lost commentary. Proclus, In Platonis Timaeum commentaria; Porphyry, In Timaeum (fragments, ed. A. R. Sodano, 1964); SEP “Porphyry”
Źródło: szkic AI
Proklos › 412–485
Boecjusz
wpływ na ✓
Boethius translated Porphyry’s Isagoge and wrote two commentaries on it, turning its unanswered questions about genera and species into the medieval problem of universals. Boethius, In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta (editio prima, editio secunda); SEP “The Medieval Problem of Universals”
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Boecjusz › ok. 477–524
Al-Farabi
wpływ na
Al-Farabi wrote an Isagoge of his own on the model of Porphyry’s introduction, which opened the Arabic logical curriculum as it had the Greek. D. M. Dunlop, “Al-Farabi’s Eisagoge”, Islamic Quarterly 3 (1956); SEP “Porphyry”
Źródło: szkic AI
Al-Farabi › ok. 872–950
Piotr Abelard
wpływ na
Abelard wrote his main logic as glosses on Porphyry’s Isagoge, answering its three questions about genera and species with his theory of universals as meaningful words. Abelard, Logica ‘Ingredientibus’ (Glosses on Porphyry); SEP “Peter Abelard”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Piotr Abelard › 1079–1142
Krytyka
Krytyka ze strony 2
Augustyn z Hippony wpływ na
wpływ na
Augustine called Porphyry ‘the most learned of the philosophers’ and made his treatise On the Return of the Soul a main interlocutor in City of God X. Augustine, City of God X, XIX.22; Porphyry, De regressu animae (fragments); SEP “Porphyry”
Źródło: szkic AI
krytyka ze strony
In City of God X Augustine faulted Porphyry for allowing theurgy and for rejecting Christ as the universal way of the soul’s return. Augustine, De civitate Dei X.9–11, X.23–32; SEP “Porphyry”
Źródło: szkic AI
Augustyn z Hippony › 354–430
Awicenna wpływ na
wpływ na
Avicenna opened the logic of the Book of the Cure with an Introduction (al-Madkhal) that follows Porphyry’s Isagoge on the five predicables. Ibn Sina, al-Shifa, al-Madkhal; SEP “Porphyry”
Źródło: szkic AI
krytyka ze strony
Avicenna rejected the doctrine, which he attributed to Porphyry, that the knowing intellect becomes identical with what it knows (Shifa, De anima V.6; al-Isharat). Ibn Sīnā, al-Shifāʾ: al-Nafs V.6; al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, namaṭ 7
Źródło: szkic AI
Awicenna › 980–1037
Krytykuje 1
Orygenes
krytykuje
Porphyry accused Origen of reading Greek philosophy into the Jewish scriptures by allegory and of trading a Greek education for a ‘barbarian’ creed. Porphyry, Against the Christians, in Eusebius, Historia ecclesiastica VI.19.4–8
Źródło: szkic AI
Orygenes › ok. 185–253
Dzieła
- ok. 270Isagoge (Wprowadzenie)
Krótkie wprowadzenie do „Kategorii” Arystotelesa o rodzaju, gatunku, różnicy, własności i przypadłości – otwiera je pytanie, czy rodzaje i gatunki naprawdę istnieją, na które autor odmawia odpowiedzi.
Cztery księgi do przyjaciela, który wrócił do jedzenia mięsa: zwierzęta mają udział w rozumie, sprawiedliwość rozciąga się na nie, a filozof powinien zrezygnować z mięsa i krwawych ofiar.
Stanowisko
Porphyry’s influence rests less on original doctrine than on the forms in which he passed on Plato and Aristotle. In the Isagoge, a short introduction to Aristotle’s Categories, he explained five terms: genus, species, difference, property and accident. At the outset he named three questions he would leave aside – whether genera and species exist or are only in the mind; if they exist, whether they are bodies or incorporeal; and whether they are separate from sensible things or in them. Through Boethius’ translation and two commentaries these questions became the medieval problem of universals, and Abelard still wrote his logic as glosses on Porphyry. The Isagoge was translated into Syriac and Arabic and opened the logical curriculum there as well: al-Farabi commented on it, and Avicenna began the logic of his Book of Healing with an Introduction (al-Madkhal) modelled on it. Porphyry held that Aristotle’s logic was compatible with Plato’s metaphysics, and his commentaries made Aristotle a fixed part of Platonist teaching. On Abstinence argues that animals have perception, memory and a share of reason, that justice extends to them, and that a philosopher who seeks to free the soul from the body should give up meat and blood sacrifice. Against the Christians, in fifteen books, examined the Bible philologically; it argued, for example, that the Book of Daniel was written in the second century BCE, not during the Exile. Christian emperors ordered it burned, and only fragments quoted by its opponents survive. Augustine called Porphyry “the most learned of the philosophers” and in The City of God argued at length against his teaching on the soul’s return to God. Avicenna, in turn, attacked the doctrine he ascribed to Porphyry that the intellect becomes identical with what it knows.
Życie i kontekst
Porphyry was born in Tyre in Phoenicia, probably in 234 CE; his Phoenician name was Malchus, “king”. He studied in Athens with the critic and Platonist Longinus and in 263 came to Rome to join the circle of Plotinus. Five years later, deeply depressed – he tells us that Plotinus noticed he was thinking of suicide – he followed his teacher’s advice and went to Sicily, where he still was when Plotinus died in 270. He later taught in Rome. Late in life he married Marcella, a widow with seven children, and addressed to her a letter of philosophical exhortation. Around 301 he published Plotinus’ treatises in six groups of nine, the Enneads, prefaced by a Life of Plotinus. He died around 305. He wrote some sixty works, of which only a few survive complete.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Isagoge (Introduction to Aristotle’s Categories, c. 270)
- On Abstinence from Killing Animals (De abstinentia, after 270)
- Commentary on the Categories (in question-and-answer form)
- On the Cave of the Nymphs in the Odyssey
- Sentences Leading to the Intelligibles (Aphormai)
- Letter to Marcella
- Against the Christians (fragments)
- Life of Plotinus and edition of the Enneads (c. 301)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora