AgoraOtwarty plac myśli

Al Biruni

973–1048

Pierwsze przybliżeniecelowe uproszczenie – portret mówi więcej

Al Biruni twierdził, że twierdzenia o naturze, nawet Arystotelesa, muszą wytrzymać próbę obserwacji i pomiaru, a religię i filozofię innego ludu należy najpierw dokładnie opisać na podstawie jego własnych tekstów, porównać z własną i dopiero potem oceniać.

Umiejscowienie

Filozofia w świecie islamu · Azja Środkowa · Nauka, Epistemologia, Religia

Uczony z Choresmu, działający na dworze Mahmuda z Ghazny: w listach do Awicenny kwestionował arystotelesowską fizykę niebios; po latach w Indiach opisał w „Indiach” (1030) religię, filozofię i nauki Hindusów na podstawie źródeł sanskryckich i przetłumaczył na arabski Jogasutry Patańdźalego.

Kluczowe idee

  • Pytania do fizyki Arystotelesa
  • Opisywanie innej kultury na podstawie jej własnych tekstów
  • Wiedza przez pomiar i obserwację
  • Porównywanie doktryn greckich, indyjskich i islamskich

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd

Wpływ

Pod wpływem 2

  • Kapila

    pod wpływem

    Al-Biruni translated into Arabic a Samkhya book that he ascribed to Kapila (Kitab Sank, lost) and drew on it throughout his India (c. 1030) for the Indian doctrines of soul, matter and liberation. al-Biruni, Tahqiq ma li-l-Hind (c. 1030), preface, chs. VII and XII, tr. E. Sachau, Alberuni’s India (1888), vol. I

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Kapila › postać legendarna

  • Patańdźali

    pod wpływem

    Al-Biruni translated Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra with a commentary into Arabic (Kitāb Bātanjal) and quoted it in his India (1030) as an authority for Hindu doctrines of the soul and liberation. S. Pines and T. Gelblum, “Al-Bīrūnī’s Arabic Version of Patañjali’s Yogasūtra”, BSOAS 29 (1966) – 52 (1989); al-Bīrūnī, Taḥqīq mā li-l-Hind (1030)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Patańdźali › ok. 325–400

Wpływ na 1

  • Seyyed Hossein Nasr

    wpływ na

    Nasr presented al-Biruni’s conception of nature, with those of the Brethren of Purity and Ibn Sina, as one of the three main Islamic cosmologies, and co-edited his correspondence with Ibn Sina. S. H. Nasr, An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines (1964); al-Asʾila wa-l-ajwiba, ed. Nasr and Mohaghegh (1972)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Seyyed Hossein Nasr › ur. 1933

Krytyka

Krytykuje 2

  • Arystoteles

    krytykuje

    In questions to Ibn Sina (c. 997) al-Biruni challenged Aristotle’s On the Heavens and Physics: why the heavens should be neither heavy nor light, why other worlds should be impossible, and why there could be no vacuum. al-Bīrūnī and Ibn Sīnā, al-Asʾila wa-l-ajwiba, ed. S. H. Nasr and M. Mohaghegh (1972); tr. R. Berjak and M. Iqbal, Islam & Science (2003–06)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.

  • Awicenna

    krytykuje

    Al-Biruni objected to Ibn Sina’s answers in defence of Aristotle and pressed his questions again; Ibn Sina’s student al-Maʿsumi replied in his place. al-Asʾila wa-l-ajwiba, ed. Nasr and Mohaghegh (1972); Berjak and Iqbal (2003–06)

    Źródło: szkic AI

    Awicenna › 980–1037

Dzieła

  • Wymiana listów około 997 roku: Al Biruni stawiał pytania o Arystotelesowskie O niebie i Fizykę – czy niebiosa mogłyby mieć ciężar, czy możliwe są inne światy, czy próżnia naprawdę jest niemożliwa – a Awicenna odpowiadał, broniąc Arystotelesa; Al Biruni zgłaszał zastrzeżenia do odpowiedzi, a uczeń Awicenny al-Maʿsumi odpowiedział.

  • Opis indyjskiej religii, filozofii, astronomii, literatury i obyczajów, napisany po tym, jak Al Biruni nauczył się sanskrytu w krajach podbitych przez Mahmuda z Ghazny: cytuje teksty indyjskie, takie jak Bhagawadgita i Patańdżali, porównuje ich doktryny z greckimi i sufickimi i zamierza relacjonować, a nie obalać.

Stanowisko

Al-Biruni is on the map as a critical natural philosopher and as the author of the most careful account of Indian thought written from outside before modern times. In his correspondence with the young Ibn Sina around 997 he asked, among other questions, why the heavens should be neither heavy nor light, why other worlds could not exist and why a vacuum should be impossible, and he pressed Aristotle’s claims against observation; Ibn Sina defended Aristotle, at times sharply, al-Biruni objected again, and Ibn Sina’s student al-Maʿsumi took over the reply. His book on India begins with the obstacles to understanding another people – language, religion, customs and mutual contempt – and proposes to report the doctrines of the Hindus as they themselves state them. He quotes the Bhagavad Gita, the Puranas, Patanjali and the Samkhya, compares them with Greek, especially Platonic, and with Sufi ideas, and in each culture distinguishes the beliefs of the learned from those of the common people. He translated Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra with a commentary and a Samkhya text into Arabic and, by his own account, parts of Euclid and Ptolemy into Sanskrit. In astronomy and geography he insisted on measurement and on the uncertainty of what cannot be measured; he discussed whether the earth rotates and left the question undecided, since it makes no difference to astronomical calculation. Seyyed Hossein Nasr (1964) placed his conception of nature beside those of the Brethren of Purity and Ibn Sina, and historians of science and of the study of religion count the India among the founding works of their fields.

Życie i kontekst

Abu l-Rayhan Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Biruni was born on 4 September 973 in the outer district (bīrūn) of Kath, the capital of Khwarazm south of the Aral Sea in present-day Uzbekistan. He studied astronomy and mathematics with the prince Abu Nasr Mansur ibn ʿIraq and, driven out by political upheavals in Khwarazm, worked for rulers in Rayy and Gorgan – to Qabus of Gorgan he dedicated his Chronology of Ancient Nations around 1000 – and again at the Khwarazmian court in Gurganj. After Mahmud of Ghazna conquered Khwarazm in 1017, al-Biruni was taken to Ghazna and spent the rest of his life in the service of the Ghaznavids. He accompanied Mahmud’s campaigns into northwestern India, learned Sanskrit, measured latitudes and the radius of the earth, and in 1030 completed his book on India. He also wrote on chronology, astronomy, geodesy, mineralogy and pharmacology and dedicated his astronomical summa, the Masʿudic Canon, to Mahmud’s son Masʿud. He died in Ghazna, probably in 1048.

Dalsze główne dzieła

  • Chronology of Ancient Nations (al-Āthār al-bāqiya ʿan al-qurūn al-khāliya, c. 1000)
  • Questions and Answers (al-Asʾila wa-l-ajwiba), correspondence with Ibn Sina (c. 997)
  • On the Determination of the Coordinates of Cities (Taḥdīd nihāyāt al-amākin, 1025)
  • India (Taḥqīq mā li-l-Hind, 1030)
  • Arabic translation of Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra (Kitāb Bātanjal)
  • The Masʿudic Canon (al-Qānūn al-Masʿūdī, c. 1037)

Źródła: Wikipedia · Wikidata

Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora

Otwórz na mapie gwiazd