AgoraAn open square of thought

Ferdinand de Saussure

1857–1913

A first way ina deliberate simplification – the portrait says more

Words get their meaning not from the things they name but from their differences to all the other words in the language.

Placement

Structuralism & Poststructuralism · Western Europe · Language

Often regarded as the founder of modern linguistics: language is a system of differences between signs.

Key ideas

  • Signifier / signified
  • Langue / parole
  • Arbitrariness of the sign

Open in the star map

Influence

Influenced 6

  • Jacques Lacan

    influenced ✓

    Lacan inverted Saussure’s sign, placing the signifier over the signified and giving it primacy, so that meaning slides along chains of signifiers (‘L’instance de la lettre’, 1957). J. Lacan, “L’instance de la lettre dans l’inconscient ou la raison depuis Freud” (1957), in Écrits (1966); F. de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (1916); SEP “Jacques Lacan”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Jacques Lacan › 1901–1981

  • Claude Lévi-Strauss

    influenced ✓

    After meeting Jakobson in New York, Lévi-Strauss took structural linguistics after Saussure as the model for anthropology, analysing kinship as a system of differences (Word, 1945). C. Lévi-Strauss, “L’analyse structurale en linguistique et en anthropologie”, Word 1 (1945), in Anthropologie structurale (1958); Les structures élémentaires de la parenté (1949)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Claude Lévi-Strauss › 1908–2009

  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty

    influenced ✓

    Merleau-Ponty took Saussure’s diacritical sign, meaningful only through differences from other signs, into his phenomenology of expression (‘Le langage indirect et les voix du silence’, 1952). M. Merleau-Ponty, “Le langage indirect et les voix du silence” (1952), in Signes (1960); La prose du monde (written 1951–52; publ. 1969); SEP “Maurice Merleau-Ponty”

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata

    Maurice Merleau-Ponty › 1908–1961

  • Roland Barthes

    influenced ✓

    Barthes applied Saussure’s signifier and signified to myth as a second-order sign system (Mythologies, 1957) and systematised his concepts for a general semiology (1964). R. Barthes, Mythologies (1957); Éléments de sémiologie (1964); F. de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (1916)

    Evidence: also in Wikidata · Wikidata · InPhO

    Roland Barthes › 1915–1980

  • Algirdas Julien Greimas

    influenced

    Greimas extended Saussure’s principle that meaning arises from differences, via Hjelmslev, to semantics, breaking meaning down into semes and isotopies (Sémantique structurale, 1966). A. J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale (1966); F. de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (1916)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Algirdas Julien Greimas › 1917–1992

  • Yuri Lotman

    influenced

    Lotman applied Saussure’s distinction of language and speech to literature, describing art as a secondary modelling system built on natural language (Struktura chudožestvennogo teksta, 1970). Ju. M. Lotman, Struktura chudožestvennogo teksta (1970); Lekcii po struktural’noj poėtike (1964)

    Evidence: AI draft

    Yuri Lotman › 1922–1993

Criticism

Criticized by 1

  • Jacques Derrida

    criticised by

    Derrida argued in Of Grammatology (1967) that Saussure banishes writing as a mere image of speech, although his principle of difference without positive terms implies a general writing. J. Derrida, De la grammatologie (1967), part I, ch. 2 “Linguistique et grammatologie”; F. de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (1916), introduction, ch. VI

    Evidence: AI draft

    Jacques Derrida › 1930–2004

Works

  • Compiled after his death by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye from students’ notes of his Geneva lectures (1907–11): the linguistic sign is arbitrary; language is a system of differences.

Position

Saussure is often regarded as the founder of modern linguistics: he shifted attention from the history of words to language as a system at a given moment. He distinguished language as a shared system (langue) from individual speaking (parole). The linguistic sign unites a sound image (signifier) with a concept (signified), and their connection is arbitrary: nothing about the sound “tree” resembles a tree. Above all, signs have no positive content on their own; they gain their value only through their differences from other signs in the system. “In language there are only differences.” This idea became the model for structuralism in anthropology, literary theory and psychoanalysis, and later the starting point of poststructuralist critique.

Life & context

Saussure was born in Geneva in 1857 and studied in Leipzig with the leading historical linguists of his time. At twenty-one he published a study of the Indo-European vowel system that is still cited. After teaching in Paris he returned to Geneva, where he lectured on general linguistics from 1907 to 1911. The Course was compiled after his death from students’ notes.

Further main works

  • Memoir on the Primitive System of Vowels in the Indo-European Languages (1878)

Sources: Wikipedia · Wikidata

As of November 2026 · Sources · Improve this page · How Agora is made

Open in the star map