Agora思想的公共广场

纳斯尔·哈米德·阿布·宰德

1943–2010

初步了解有意简化——人物介绍讲得更多

《古兰经》以其时代的语言和文化说话,因此理解它需要诠释——任何诠释者都不能声称以真主本身的权威说话。

定位

伊斯兰世界的哲学 · 西亚与北非 · 宗教, 语言

埃及的古兰经学与文学理论学者,他把《古兰经》读作处于历史与语言之中、向诠释开放的文本;1995年埃及法院宣判他为叛教者(背弃信仰之人)并判令其离婚之后,他与妻子移居荷兰,在莱顿和乌得勒支任教。

核心思想

  • 《古兰经》作为文本与交流
  • 圣典诠释学
  • 对宗教话语的批判
  • 伊本·阿拉比的诠释哲学

在星图中打开

影响

受影响于 2

  • 伊本·阿拉比

    受其影响

    Abu Zayd’s doctoral thesis, published as The Philosophy of Interpretation (Falsafat al-tawil, 1983), studied Ibn Arabi’s theory and practice of Quranic interpretation. N. H. Abu Zayd, Falsafat al-tawil: dirasa fi tawil al-Quran inda Muhyi al-Din ibn Arabi (1983)

    依据: AI 草稿

    伊本·阿拉比 › 1165–1240

  • 汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔

    受其影响

    Abu Zayd’s essay ‘Hermeneutics and the Problem of Interpreting the Text’ (1981) introduced Arabic readers to Gadamer’s hermeneutics, a starting point for his theory of the text. N. H. Abu Zayd, “al-Hirminiyutiqa wa-mudilat tafsir al-nass”, Fusul (1981)

    依据: AI 草稿

    汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔 › 1900–2002

作品

  • 一项关于古典古兰经学的研究:《古兰经》是以其时代的阿拉伯语言和文化传达的讯息,文本与其文化相互塑造。

  • 伊斯兰主义者与宗教建制共享一些前提:他们把自己的诠释等同于文本本身,并声称以真主之名说话;此书成为针对他的诉讼的核心。

立场

Abu Zayd’s work started from the claim that the Qur’an is a text: a message from God, but one communicated in human language, in Arabic, to a particular society, and therefore subject to the rules of language and interpretation. In “The Concept of the Text” (1990) he showed how the classical Qur’anic sciences had themselves dealt with the historical setting of revelation, and argued that the text was shaped by its culture and in turn reshaped it. He drew on the Mutazilite doctrine of the createdness of the Qur’an, on modern linguistics and on hermeneutics; an essay of 1981 introduced Arabic readers to the hermeneutic tradition from Schleiermacher to Gadamer, and he adopted E. D. Hirsch’s distinction between meaning (mana) and significance (maghza). His “Critique of Religious Discourse” (1992) analysed the shared assumptions of the Islamist movement and the religious establishment, above all the identification of their own interpretation with religion itself. In his later work he spoke of the Qur’an as a set of discourses rather than a single text and called for a “humanistic hermeneutics”. He always described himself as a believing Muslim; his case became a symbol of the struggle over freedom of research in the Arab world.

生平与背景

Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd was born on 10 July 1943 in Quhafa near Tanta in the Nile Delta. After a technical training he worked as a telecommunications technician while studying Arabic language and literature at Cairo University, where he graduated in 1972. His master’s thesis dealt with the rationalist Qur’anic interpretation of the Mutazila and his doctoral thesis (1981) with Ibn Arabi’s philosophy of interpretation. He taught at Cairo University and spent periods at the University of Pennsylvania and at Osaka University of Foreign Studies. In 1992 his promotion to full professor was blocked after a report accused his writings of unbelief. Islamist lawyers then sued for his separation from his wife, the literary scholar Ebtehal Younes, on the grounds that he was an apostate, and in 1995 an appeals court granted their claim. Facing threats to their lives, the couple moved to the Netherlands, where he taught at Leiden University and later held a chair in Utrecht. He died in Cairo on 5 July 2010 after an illness contracted on a journey.

其他主要作品

  • The Rational Trend in Exegesis (al-Ittijāh al-ʿaqlī fī al-tafsīr, 1982)
  • The Philosophy of Interpretation (Falsafat al-taʾwīl, 1983)
  • The Concept of the Text (1990)
  • Imam al-Shāfiʿī and the Foundation of the Ideology of the Middle Way (1992)
  • Critique of Religious Discourse (1992)
  • Rethinking the Qur’an: Towards a Humanistic Hermeneutics (2004)
  • Voice of an Exile: Reflections on Islam (with Esther R. Nelson, 2004)

来源: Wikipedia · Wikidata

截至 2026年11月 · 来源 · 改进本页 · Agora 是如何制作的

在星图中打开