John Toland
Nic, co sprzeczne z rozumem lub ponad rozum, nie należy do prawdziwej religii; tajemnice chrześcijaństwa dodali kapłani dla władzy; materia jest sama w sobie czynna, ponieważ ruch należy do jej istoty, a wszechświat jako całość można nazwać Bogiem.
Umiejscowienie
Irlandzki wolnomyśliciel i pisarz: „Christianity not Mysterious” (1696) nie dopuszczało w religii niczego, co jest sprzeczne z rozumem albo ponad nim; później twierdził, że ruch należy do samej materii, i ukuł słowo „panteista” na określenie tego, kto utożsamia Boga z wszechświatem.
Kluczowe idee
- Religia w granicach rozumu
- Ruch istotny dla materii
- Panteizm
- Krytyka kapłańskich matactw
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 2
Giordano Bruno
pod wpływem
Toland circulated Bruno’s works in England and wrote an account of his On the Infinite Universe and Worlds (1584), printed in A Collection of Several Pieces (1726). J. Toland, A Collection of Several Pieces, ed. P. Des Maizeaux (1726); J. Champion, Republican Learning: John Toland and the Crisis of Christian Culture, 1696–1722 (2003)
Źródło: szkic AI
Giordano Bruno › 1548–1600
John Locke
pod wpływem
Toland’s Christianity not Mysterious (1696) applied the theory of knowledge of Locke’s Essay to religion: nothing in the Gospel is contrary to reason or above it. J. Toland, Christianity not Mysterious (1696); J. Locke, replies to Stillingfleet (1697–99); S. H. Daniel, John Toland: His Methods, Manners, and Mind (1984)
Źródło: szkic AI
John Locke › 1632–1704
Krytyka
Krytyka ze strony 1
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
krytyka ze strony
Leibniz annotated Toland’s Christianity not Mysterious (1701), defending mysteries above but not against reason, and argued against his materialism at the Berlin court (letter to Sophie Charlotte, 1702). G. W. Leibniz, Annotatiunculae subitaneae ad Tolandi librum De Christianismo mysteriis carente (1701); Lettre touchant ce qui est indépendant des sens et de la matière (1702)
Źródło: szkic AI
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz › 1646–1716
Krytykuje 1
Baruch Spinoza
krytykuje
Toland argued in Letters to Serena (1704, Letter IV) that Spinoza’s system lacks a principle, since it fails to explain motion, which Toland held essential to matter. J. Toland, Letters to Serena (1704), Letters IV–V; S. H. Daniel, John Toland: His Methods, Manners, and Mind (1984)
Źródło: szkic AI
Baruch Spinoza › 1632–1677
Dzieła
Dowodzi na gruncie teorii poznania Locke’a, że nic w Ewangelii nie jest sprzeczne z rozumem ani ponad nim i że „tajemnice” wprowadzili kapłani; parlament irlandzki nakazał spalić książkę w 1697 roku.
Pięć listów, pierwsze trzy skierowane do Zofii Charlotty Pruskiej („Sereny”), o pochodzeniu przesądów i wiary w nieśmiertelność; ostatnie dwa krytykują Spinozę za to, że pozostawił ruch niewyjaśniony, i dowodzą, że ruch jest istotny dla materii.
Stanowisko
Toland is on the map as a leading freethinker of the early Enlightenment. “Christianity not Mysterious” applied the theory of knowledge of Locke’s “Essay” to religion: we can assent only to what we have clear ideas of, so nothing in the Gospel can be contrary to reason or above it, and the “mysteries” of Christianity were later additions by priests. Locke, whose Essay Bishop Stillingfleet had linked with the book, distanced himself from it, and Leibniz wrote critical notes on it. In “Letters to Serena” (1704) Toland traced prejudices and the belief in the immortality of the soul to education and priestcraft, and against Spinoza he argued that motion is not imparted to matter from outside but is essential to it – a step towards a materialist view of nature. He coined the word “pantheist” (1705) and in “Pantheisticon” (1720) described a society of pantheists with its own liturgy. He also wrote on the history of the biblical canon, on the Druids and, in “Reasons for Naturalizing the Jews in Great Britain and Ireland” (1714), for full civic rights for Jews. Historians of the “radical Enlightenment” such as Margaret Jacob and Jonathan Israel see in him a link between Spinozism, republicanism and later materialism.
Życie i kontekst
John Toland was born on 30 November 1670 on the Inishowen peninsula in County Donegal and was raised a Catholic; at sixteen he converted to Protestantism. He studied at Glasgow and Edinburgh and then at Leiden and Oxford. “Christianity not Mysterious” (1696) made him notorious: the Irish Parliament ordered the book to be burned in 1697, and he left Ireland. He lived by his pen as a writer, editor and Whig pamphleteer, edited works of Milton, James Harrington and Edmund Ludlow, and travelled on political and private missions to Hanover and Berlin, where he conversed with Sophia of Hanover, Sophie Charlotte of Prussia and Leibniz. In his last years he lived in poverty in Putney near London. He died there on 11 March 1722, having written his own epitaph.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Amyntor (1699)
- Reasons for Naturalizing the Jews in Great Britain and Ireland (1714)
- Nazarenus (1718)
- Pantheisticon (1720)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora