José Medina
Przywilej może czynić ludzi aktywnie ignoranckimi wobec życia innych, a wiedza rośnie przez tarcie – dzięki temu, że pozwalamy się podważać głosom, które nam się opierają.
Umiejscowienie
Hiszpański filozof z Northwestern, pomiędzy Wittgensteinem, Deweyem i krytyczną teorią rasy: przywilej rodzi „aktywną ignorancję”, a wiedza rośnie dzięki „tarciu epistemicznemu” z głosami stawiającymi opór.
Kluczowe idee
- Aktywna ignorancja
- Tarcie epistemiczne
- Metalucydność
- Epistemologia oporu
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 3
John Dewey
pod wpływem
Medina paired Dewey with Wittgenstein in a pragmatic contextualism in which agreement in meaning is achieved and contested in practice (2004; Speaking from Elsewhere, 2006). J. Medina, “In Defense of Pragmatic Contextualism: Wittgenstein and Dewey on Meaning and Agreement”, Philosophical Forum (2004); Speaking from Elsewhere (2006)
Źródło: szkic AI
John Dewey › 1859–1952
Ludwig Wittgenstein
pod wpływem
Medina read Wittgenstein as a contextualist for whom meaning rests on shared practices (The Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy, 2002), extending this to identity and agency (2006). J. Medina, The Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy: Necessity, Intelligibility, and Normativity (2002); Speaking from Elsewhere (2006)
Źródło: szkic AI
Ludwig Wittgenstein › 1889–1951
Michel Foucault
pod wpływem
Following Foucault’s idea of counter-memory, Medina proposed a ‘guerrilla pluralism’ of resistant memories that create epistemic friction against official histories (The Epistemology of Resistance, 2013). J. Medina, “Toward a Foucaultian Epistemology of Resistance: Counter-Memory, Epistemic Friction, and Guerrilla Pluralism”, Foucault Studies (2011); The Epistemology of Resistance (2013)
Źródło: szkic AI
Michel Foucault › 1926–1984
Krytyka
Krytykuje 1
Miranda Fricker
krytykuje
Medina, largely agreeing with Fricker, objected that her ‘collective hermeneutical resource’ suggests a single pool, and argued for analysing plural interpretive communities (‘Polyphonic Contextualism’, 2012). J. Medina, “Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism”, Social Epistemology 26 (2012) 201–220; The Epistemology of Resistance (2013); M. Fricker, Epistemic Injustice (2007); Fricker’s reply: “How is Hermeneutical Injustice Related to ‘White Ignorance’?”, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (2013)
Źródło: szkic AI
Miranda Fricker › ur. 1966
Stanowisko
Medina’s early books read Wittgenstein as a contextualist thinker close to pragmatism: meaning rests on shared practices, and, as with Dewey, agreement in practices is achieved and contested rather than simply given. “Speaking from Elsewhere” extends this to identity and discursive agency: we always speak from social positions, and those who speak from the margins can reshape meanings. “The Epistemology of Resistance” develops a social epistemology of oppression. Privilege tends to produce “active ignorance” – not a mere lack of knowledge but a socially sustained inability to know, marked by epistemic vices such as arrogance, laziness and closed-mindedness – while the oppressed often develop virtues such as humility, curiosity and open-mindedness. Medina calls for “meta-lucidity”, an awareness of the limits of one’s own ways of seeing. Knowledge improves through “epistemic friction”, the encounter with perspectives that resist our own, and through what he calls, following Foucault’s idea of counter-memory, a “guerrilla pluralism”. Against Fricker he argues that hermeneutical injustice is not a single gap but a plural and uneven phenomenon that affects different publics differently. “The Epistemology of Protest” examines silencing and protest as forms of epistemic activism.
Życie i kontekst
José Medina (born 1968) is a philosopher from Spain. He studied philosophy at the University of Seville and took his doctorate at Northwestern University in 1998. He taught at Saint Louis University and from 1999 to 2017 at Vanderbilt University, with a year as holder of a chair of excellence at the Universidad Carlos III in Madrid, and in 2017 returned to Northwestern, where he is Walter Dill Scott Professor of Philosophy. His work spans the philosophy of language, Wittgenstein and pragmatism, social epistemology and critical race, feminist and queer theory. “The Epistemology of Resistance” received the book award of the North American Society for Social Philosophy.
Główne dzieła
- The Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy (2002)
- Language: Key Concepts in Philosophy (2005)
- Speaking from Elsewhere (2006)
- The Epistemology of Resistance (2013)
- The Epistemology of Protest (2023)
Pojawia się w
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora