Albert Wielki
Wiara i badanie przyrody nie są w konflikcie, więc chrześcijanie powinni poznać wszystko, co odkryli Arystoteles i jego arabscy komentatorzy.
Umiejscowienie
„Doctor universalis”: udostępnił łacińskiemu Zachodowi całe dzieło Arystotelesa wraz z jego arabskimi komentarzami.
Kluczowe idee
- Recepcja Arystotelesa
- Nauki przyrodnicze
Uczniowie: Tomasz z Akwinu
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 4
Arystoteles
pod wpływem
Albert set out to make the whole of Aristotle intelligible to Latin readers in paraphrases of logic, physics, metaphysics, ethics and the life sciences, using Arabic commentators. Albertus Magnus, Physica I tr. 1 c. 1 (programme); SEP “Albert the Great”
Źródło: także w InPhO · InPhO
Arystoteles › 384–322 p.n.e.
Pseudo-Dionizy Areopagita
pod wpływem
Albert commented on the whole Dionysian corpus around 1248–50, partly in Cologne with Thomas Aquinas as his student, and took up its negative theology. Albertus Magnus, Super Dionysium De divinis nominibus; Super Dionysii Mysticam theologiam; SEP “Albert the Great”
Źródło: szkic AI
Pseudo-Dionizy Areopagita › ok. 480–530
Awicenna
pod wpływem ✓
Albert drew on Avicenna’s paraphrases of Aristotle, especially his account of the inner senses and the intellect, throughout his commentaries such as De anima. Albertus Magnus, De anima; De homine; SEP “Albert the Great”; SEP “Ibn Sina [Avicenna]”
Awicenna › 980–1037
Awerroes
pod wpływem
Albert used Averroes’ commentaries throughout his Aristotle paraphrases, while rejecting his single intellect for all humans (De unitate intellectus contra Averroem, 1256). Albertus Magnus, De unitate intellectus contra Averroem (1256); SEP “Albert the Great”
Źródło: szkic AI
Awerroes › 1126–1198
Wpływ na 2
Tomasz z Akwinu uczeń/uczennica
uczeń/uczennica ✓
Attested by Thomas’s own hand – a manuscript of Albert’s commentary on Dionysius’ Divine Names in his handwriting survives in Naples – and by biographers who knew him; anecdotes such as the ‘dumb ox’ come from William of Tocco’s later Life. G. Théry, “L’autographe de S. Thomas conservé à la Biblioteca Nazionale de Naples”, Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 1 (1931); William of Tocco, Ystoria sancti Thome; J.-P. Torrell, Saint Thomas Aquinas I, ch. 2
Tomasz z Akwinu › ok. 1225–1274
Mistrz Eckhart
wpływ na
Eckhart’s thought shows the influence of Albert’s Neoplatonic Aristotelianism; he cited Albert in an Easter sermon of 1294, but whether he studied under him in Cologne is uncertain. Meister Eckhart, Sermo Paschalis (Paris, 1294); SEP “Meister Eckhart”; SEP “Albert the Great”
Źródło: szkic AI
Mistrz Eckhart › ok. 1260–1328
Stanowisko
Albert set out to make the whole of Aristotle intelligible to Latin Christians – logic, physics, metaphysics, ethics and the life sciences – drawing heavily on Arabic commentators such as Avicenna and Averroes. He defended the relative autonomy of natural philosophy: in questions about nature one should reason from causes and experience rather than from miracles. His own observations of plants, animals and minerals made him one of the great naturalists of the Middle Ages. By showing that Aristotle could be studied without endangering faith, he prepared the ground for the synthesis of his student Thomas and for the Neoplatonic mysticism of the German Dominicans.
Życie i kontekst
Born around 1200 in Lauingen in Swabia, Albert joined the Dominican order and taught at Paris and Cologne, where Thomas Aquinas was his pupil. He served briefly as bishop of Regensburg (1260–1262) and spent his last decades in Cologne. Contemporaries already called him “the Great” and “Doctor universalis” for the sheer range of his learning.
Główne dzieła
- Commentaries on Aristotle (c. 1250–1270)
- On Minerals (c. 1250)
- On the Unity of the Intellect against Averroes (c. 1256)
- On Animals (c. 1260)
Pojawia się w
- Podróż „Podróż Arystotelesa” · Przystanek 8 z 9
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora