Ahmad Sirhindi
Ahmad Sirhindi twierdził, że mistyczne doświadczenie jedności całego bytu jest etapem drogi, a nie jej końcem; na wyższym etapie „jedności świadectwa” Bóg i stworzenie są widziane jako odrębne, a wgląd mistyczny pozostaje związany z objawieniem i prawem.
Umiejscowienie
Sufi bractwa nakszbandijja z Sirhindu w Pendżabie, nazywany przez uczniów „odnowicielem drugiego tysiąclecia”: w listach do uczniów i urzędników Mogołów dowodził, że mistyczne doświadczenie jedności bytu (wahdat al-wudżud), kojarzone z Ibn Arabim, jest tylko etapem, za którym leży „jedność świadectwa” (wahdat asz-szuhud), w której Bóg i świat pozostają odrębne.
Kluczowe idee
- Jedność świadectwa zamiast jedności bytu
- Doświadczenie mistyczne pod władzą objawienia
- Odnowa (tajdīd) na przełomie tysiąclecia
- Szariat i droga sufich jako jedno
Wpływ
Wpływ na 2
Shah Waliullah
wpływ na
Shah Waliullah sought to reconcile Sirhindi’s “unity of witnessing” with the “unity of being”, arguing that the two differ more in expression than in substance. Shāh Walī Allāh, Fayṣala-yi waḥdat al-wujūd wa-l-shuhūd; J. M. S. Baljon, Religion and Thought of Shah Wali Allah Dihlawi (1986)
Źródło: szkic AI
Shah Waliullah › 1703–1762
Muhammad Ikbal
wpływ na ✓
Iqbal praised Sirhindi’s critical stance towards the Sufism of his time in the Reconstruction (1930) and honoured him in a poem in Bal-i Jibril (1935). M. Iqbal, The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam (1930), lecture 7; Bāl-i Jibrīl (1935)
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Muhammad Ikbal › 1877–1938
Krytyka
Krytykuje 1
Ibn Arabi
krytykuje
Sirhindi held that the “unity of being” associated with Ibn Arabi is a stage of mystical experience, surpassed by the “unity of witnessing”, in which God and the world remain distinct. Aḥmad Sirhindī, Maktūbāt; Y. Friedmann, Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi (1971); A. Schimmel, Mystical Dimensions of Islam (1975)
Źródło: szkic AI
Ibn Arabi › 1165–1240
Dzieła
Ponad pięćset listów po persku, zebranych w trzech tomach od 1617 roku: do uczniów, mistrzów sufickich i urzędników dworu mogolskiego Sirhindi wyjaśnia etapy drogi mistycznej, przeciwstawia „jedność świadectwa” „jedności bytu” i wzywa, by szariat kierował państwem.
Stanowisko
Sirhindi is on the map as the most influential critic of the doctrine of the “unity of being” (waḥdat al-wujūd), which later Sufis associated with Ibn Arabi, and as the founder of the Mujaddidi branch of the Naqshbandi order. In his letters he described the mystical path as a sequence of stages. The experience that only God truly exists and that the world is one with Him belongs to an intermediate stage; at the higher stage of the “unity of witnessing” (waḥdat al-shuhūd) the mystic recognises that the oneness he experienced lay in his own perception, and that God and creation remain distinct – creation is a shadow of God’s attributes, not one with His being. Mystical experience must therefore be measured against revelation and the sharia, which it cannot surpass. His followers called him the “renewer of the second millennium” (mujaddid-i alf-i thānī), since he wrote at the turn of the Islamic millennium. In letters to Mughal nobles he called for the restoration of the sharia in the state after Akbar’s religious policies; these letters also contain hostile remarks about Hindus and Shiʿis. How far he shaped later Mughal politics, as was long claimed, has been questioned by Yohanan Friedmann (1971), who traced how his image as a champion of orthodoxy grew after his death. In the eighteenth century Shah Waliullah sought to reconcile the two doctrines of unity as differing more in expression than in substance, and Muhammad Iqbal praised Sirhindi’s critical stance towards the Sufism of his time. The Mujaddidi order spread from India to Central Asia, the Ottoman Empire and beyond.
Życie i kontekst
Ahmad ibn ʿAbd al-Ahad Sirhindi was born on 26 June 1564 in Sirhind in the Punjab, into a family that traced its descent to the caliph ʿUmar. His father, a Sufi of the Chishti and Qadiri orders, taught him; he studied further in Sialkot and spent some years at the court of the Mughal emperor Akbar in Agra, where he knew the court scholars Abu l-Fazl and Fayzi. In 1599 he was initiated in Delhi into the Naqshbandi order by the Central Asian master Khwaja Baqi Billah, after whose death in 1603 he led a growing circle of disciples. His letters to officials at the court of Jahangir drew suspicion, and in 1619 the emperor had him imprisoned in the fortress of Gwalior for about a year, after which he was released and received at court. He died in Sirhind on 10 December 1624; his tomb there is a place of pilgrimage.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Letters (Maktūbāt-i Imām-i Rabbānī), three volumes
- Proof of Prophecy (Ithbāt al-nubuwwa), in Arabic
- Origin and Return (al-Mabdaʾ wa-l-maʿād)
- Treatise against the Shiʿis (Radd-i rawāfiḍ)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora